PN: ‘Puzzled about something if stocky man was known to jodi, why was he walking behind her and not with her ??? Was he trying to catch up, surely he could have shouted wait for me !!
Gordon Graham: ‘I think he was sent after her either to watch her or to make sure she got to where she was suppose to be going. It would depend on what happened before hand as to whether she wanted that.
And some have sense to ask - as what is being suggested, regardless of which way one may look at in, however many options of nonsense are pushed out. That it is completely ludicrous to tie this stocky man in with someone who knew this girl. But we do not have to of course. As there has been nothing in the slightest - to confirm that this was Jodi herself. It matters not, how many times Ms Lean may wish to push DF to the background in all of this - that his team of highly professional bodies looked over every inch of these possible sightings. The excuses - DF could not use any of this as they were not inclusive of the prosecution case. That there was no funding - the usual guff of course: As we know DF included part of a witness statement in respect of the duo on the bike - of a witness that was no inclusive of the trial itself as in being called to give evidence.
We know that DF had asked the boys on the bike - why was your bike up against this wall, close to the V break? - "I dunno?" You see, he did have this statement from the Basically Tool Hire place. The witness was not called of course. He did however attempt to use it, as he had it and he wanted to disperse doubt amongst the Jury. He is the defence after all. He knew this claimed sighting was both impossible and it had not been confirmed for reliability. - But he did not introduce any "possible" sightings of this girl nor that of this Stocky man - for he had seen all of the information on it. He knew these had not been confirmed, that they held no water. There was absolutely nothing to show - that Jodi had left home after 5pm. That she was being "followed" by anyone and most definitely not by her brother, or sisters boyfriend, JF or anyone else. Again we are being asked ("the willfully ignorant") To ignore everything and everyone else to concentrate on Ms Leans slim to nil possibilities of all and everything. Really?
It takes very little common sense to realise - That there was definitely no confirmed sightings of Jodi walking to this path to meet with Luke. If there had been they would simply have been used. By both sides. First of all, when one wants to talk stitch ups - would it have mattered moving AB a couple of minutes forward - and this possible sighting of Jodi a couple of minutes back to tie together. For that is the reality here. One it was not confirmed as Jodi thus not used. If it had been confirmed as her it would simply have been used. And IF it had been a positive sighting, and there was anything at all of substance - that could have shown the sighting by AB to be wrong - It would have been used - Plain and simple. DF would have done to AO, JuJ and anyone else what he did to the duo on the bike - any means to show that Jodi had not left her house shortly after 4.50pm. There simply was nothing to use. There was absolutely nothing in these claims - That Jodi had left much later, that she was being "followed". Irrespective of the press (they hate).T
here had been possible sightings of a male, walking along in the direction of Morris Road, possibly at the same time as Jodi. Not following - absolute nonsense. - Makes it sound the part however - doesn't it?
This stocky man is nothing more than a smoke screen - for those willing to soak any piece of nonsense up. We know an appeal was put out when witness's first came forward - and we know once the girl with the buggy came forward all changed - perhaps Ms Lean needs to show her statement? We know one witness had gotten her day/ time and ID of the stocky man completely wrong. And DF knew why all the information, ID and timings of this stocky man were also wrong - Not Ms Lean though. One must ignore every other piece of evidence. It is irrelevant as they do not fit with Ms Leans theories - those ever so accurate fictional pieces of narrative?
"those rivers of ink?"