Author Topic: British History Matters!  (Read 42793 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #30 on: June 12, 2020, 02:21:12 PM »

I just watched the Farage interview, he pointed out that BLM are a far left group who want to de-fund & disband the police. (Which is absolutely true, you can read their manifesto online, where they also demand reparations for slavery, even though no black person alive today was ever a slave)

He was shouted down by the other guests, who resorted to personal attacks & accuse him of talking out of his backside.....they have obviously never read BLM's list of demands.

The descendants  of slave owners were paid reparations for their loss of income right up until 2015 so why not the descendants of slaves ?

https://www.taxjustice.net/2020/06/09/slavery-compensation-uk-questions/
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #31 on: June 12, 2020, 02:23:56 PM »
Did you mean the article I shared?

If so, I think you'll find that Inaya Folarin Iman is very much black.
However, she did stand for the brexit party in the last election.

There you go then.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #32 on: June 12, 2020, 03:14:05 PM »

These protests have nothing to do with racism

Black Lives Matter UK is pushing a debilitating, fact-free victim narrative.


INAYA FOLARIN IMAN

8th June 2020

In an already fractious social context, what has been perceived by some to be a racially motivated killing – the murder of George Floyd by a police officer in the US – has sparked protests and riots across America. These protests have spilled over into the UK and have amalgamated into a wider crusade against what is claimed to be ‘systemic’ racism and injustice.

But far from working to address social injustice and extreme inequality, the dominant narratives emerging from the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests simply recycle and rehabilitate tired, divisive, unfounded, counterproductive and destructive arguments. These protests threaten to wind the clock back on race relations and social progress in the UK.

The UK BLM protests are not about racial injustice. It is one thing to march ‘in solidarity’ and to demand justice. But what we are seeing here is a concerted effort to construct an all-encompassing mythology about what it means to be black in the world today – one that essentialises the black experience to be one of racism, oppression and victimisation, irrespective of any facts to the contrary. This pseudo-radical movement robs people of their agency and manipulates the goodwill of others.

The attempt by these protesters to compare race relations in America to those in Britain is ridiculous and insulting. The two countries have vastly different histories and contexts. There is of course a history of racism here, but Britain today is a very different place to that of 30 or 40 years ago.

We cannot change the past, only our present and our future. By binding people down by their history, we are sending a deeply demoralising message to a young generation of black people in the UK, people who are living in a society that has made leaps and bounds when it comes to racial equality. Despite polls consistently showing high levels of trust in police and faith in British democracy among black people in the UK, and despite the current cabinet being among the most diverse ever, BLM activists are determined to argue that British society is riddled with racism.

There are genuine and legitimate social ills that are disproportionately plaguing people of black and minority-ethnic heritage – such as the grotesque levels of knife crime among youths in London, the disproportionate number of deaths from Covid-19, and ongoing unfair treatment in the immigration system. But if we are to address these complex issues, we need to look at a range of contributing factors. Racism no doubt plays a part in some of the disadvantages people face. But the kneejerk assumption that all racialised outcomes and disparities are a result of racism does a huge disservice to those who are most affected by these problems. Targeted and nuanced solutions get drowned out by blanket generalisations.

What’s more, the diversity of BAME voices on these issues is being erased. There are many different ideas of what progress, equality and fairness looks like, and how we could achieve those goals. But the one-dimensional narrative about white privilege, systemic racism and black victimhood is purported to be self-evidently true and indisputable.

Several misleading statistics have been used to paint a picture of the UK as a racist society. One example is deaths in police custody. In reality, as the BBC has noted, ‘over the past 10 years, 163 people have died in or following police custody in England and Wales’. Of the 163, 13 were black. In fact, over the past 10 years, ‘a white individual who has been arrested was about 25 per cent more likely to die in custody than a black individual who had been arrested’. No one should die unnecessarily in police custody. But as the figures show, this problem is hardly an example of an epidemic of systemic racism in policing in Britain.

Many BAME people have come from or are the children of recent immigrants to the UK. It takes time for things to change, to build intergenerational wealth, and to move up the social ladder. But this is happening for many, although it is happening at different rates for different groups (which further complicates the ‘systemic racism’ argument). An example of this is the achievements of British-Nigerian children. According to the Institute for Public Policy Research, the proportion of British-Nigerian pupils who gained 5 A*–C grades at GCSE (including maths and English) in 2010-11 was 21.8 percentage points higher than the England mean of 56.9 per cent, and much higher than the attainment of white British and British Jamaican children.

Another example of things getting better is representation in the media. A recent report by the Creative Diversity Network (CDN) found that BAME on-screen representation is at a ‘remarkable’ 23 per cent — this figure is actually higher than the BAME share of the British general population, which is estimated to be 14 per cent.

In society at large, the trends are positive. Interracial relationships have significantly increased over the past 10 years. Although this is not full proof that social and cultural boundaries are diminishing, it is a strong indication that they are beginning to. Far-right politics in the UK, meanwhile, has collapsed, and social-attitudes surveys consistently show that racial prejudice is in long-term decline in the UK.

There is much more that needs improving. But I fundamentally reject the overly negative characterisation of British society we are being presented with, and I begrudge being homogenised into a narrative that does not speak to my reality or my experience.

The goodwill and naivety of many is being exploited to push a toxic agenda. An agenda that, if taken to its logical conclusion, would produce a new form of racial prejudice. As we’ve seen, groups of white people at protests are kneeling, apologising and begging for forgiveness for actions they did not commit, in a depressing display of self-flagellation and white guilt. It’s embarrassing. And it does absolutely nothing to move society forward. No ideas or policies are being offered – there is just virtue-signalling, power games and a pathetic spectacle that will only breed resentment and lead to a further descent into social disorientation.

The last few days have been mentally exhausting, but also incredibly revealing. Anti-racism is no longer about fighting for the right of all people to be seen as individuals. It has become a corporation-endorsed movement about making meaningless gestures that do little to address complex issues. It has become a movement that refuses to look at the root of the problems it claims to care about.

If you want to change society, start with yourself, start at home. I do not need to be told that my life matters. I know that my life matters, and I do not define my self-worth by the validation of others. White people owe me nothing and I expect nothing from them, other than basic respect for me as a human being.

https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/06/08/these-protests-have-nothing-to-do-with-racism/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/52890363



Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #33 on: June 12, 2020, 03:33:06 PM »
The descendants  of slave owners were paid reparations for their loss of income right up until 2015 so why not the descendants of slaves ?

https://www.taxjustice.net/2020/06/09/slavery-compensation-uk-questions/

No, the slave owners were paid in 1800 & whatever.
It took the government until 2015 to repay the loan they took.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline faithlilly

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #34 on: June 12, 2020, 03:40:51 PM »
No, the slave owners were paid in 1800 & whatever.
It took the government until 2015 to repay the loan they took.

No matter what way you look at it we were still paying part of our taxes until 2015 to pay the slave owners.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #35 on: June 12, 2020, 03:42:57 PM »
No matter what way you look at it we were still paying part of our taxes until 2015 to pay the slave owners.

No we weren't. We were paying off a loan.
And I want my money back
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #36 on: June 12, 2020, 04:06:26 PM »
Did you mean the article I shared?

If so, I think you'll find that Inaya Folarin Iman is very much black.
However, she did stand for the brexit party in the last election.
Faithlilly assumed the writer was white and assumes everyone who has commented on this thread is white.  What is that say about assuming making an ass out of you...?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #37 on: June 12, 2020, 05:35:20 PM »
No we weren't. We were paying off a loan.
And I want my money back

Frame it how you like but it doesn’t change the facts.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #38 on: June 12, 2020, 05:51:23 PM »
Frame it how you like but it doesn’t change the facts.

There's a huge difference between the government paying the ancestors of slave owners until 2015, which is what you claimed, & the reality which is the government having taken a loan & paid slave owners off back in 1835.

Read the very link you supplied.....

"It’s hard to believe but it was only in 2015 that, according to the Treasury, British taxpayers finished ‘paying off’ the debt which the British government incurred in order to compensate British slave owners in 1835 because of the abolition of slavery. Abolition meant their profiteering from human misery would (gradually) come to an end. Not a penny was paid to those who were enslaved and brutalised.

The British government borrowed £20 million to compensate slave owners, which amounted to a massive 40 percent of the Treasury’s annual income or about 5 percent of British GDP. The loan was one of the largest in history."


No slave owners ancestors were compensated by the government in 2014, for example, ....unless you know differently.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Eleanor

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #39 on: June 12, 2020, 06:12:00 PM »

Read My Blog.  My youngest son was seriously impressed.  But more for the sake of Literature.

Offline faithlilly

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #40 on: June 12, 2020, 06:13:18 PM »
There's a huge difference between the government paying the ancestors of slave owners until 2015, which is what you claimed, & the reality which is the government having taken a loan & paid slave owners off back in 1835.

Read the very link you supplied.....

"It’s hard to believe but it was only in 2015 that, according to the Treasury, British taxpayers finished ‘paying off’ the debt which the British government incurred in order to compensate British slave owners in 1835 because of the abolition of slavery. Abolition meant their profiteering from human misery would (gradually) come to an end. Not a penny was paid to those who were enslaved and brutalised.

The British government borrowed £20 million to compensate slave owners, which amounted to a massive 40 percent of the Treasury’s annual income or about 5 percent of British GDP. The loan was one of the largest in history."


No slave owners ancestors were compensated by the government in 2014, for example, ....unless you know differently.

I think you mean descendants. We were still paying the price with our taxes of reparations to slave owners in 2015...that it wasn’t directly to the slave owner’s descendants makes no difference. If we can afford to pay for reparations so long after slavery was abolished then we can afford to compensate the descendants of the victims of that slavery.

On another track.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/11/black-deaths-in-police-custody-the-tip-of-an-iceberg-of-racist-treatment
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #41 on: June 12, 2020, 06:21:34 PM »


Wow....blacks account for 8% of deaths in custody!

That means there's a hell of a lot of white people dying in custody.

We need to protest this.......White Lives Matter.......or might that be considered a little racist.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Eleanor

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #42 on: June 12, 2020, 06:27:13 PM »

Wow....blacks account for 8% of deaths in custody!

That means there's a hell of a lot of white people dying in custody.

We need to protest this.......White Lives Matter.......or might that be considered a little racist.

Not just a little.  I have lost track of when my life mattered.  But I don't whinge about it.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #43 on: June 12, 2020, 06:52:23 PM »

Wow....blacks account for 8% of deaths in custody!

That means there's a hell of a lot of white people dying in custody.

We need to protest this.......White Lives Matter.......or might that be considered a little racist.
What are they dying of?  Are they being killed in prison by their gaolers or the police?  Or other prisoners?  Or committing suicide?  Or dying because or a recently ingested drug overdose?  What?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: British History Matters!
« Reply #44 on: June 12, 2020, 06:55:43 PM »
Those who die in police custody in England and Wales are typically male, aged between 31 and 50, and from a White ethnic background. Other comparable Western countries for which data was found show a similar demographic profile.
 Those who die from suicide following police custody in England and Wales are also typically male, aged between 31 and 50, and from a White ethnic background. Individuals arrested for sexual offences are much more likely to die from an apparent suicide following police custody compared with those arrested for other offence types (12 times higher than the average). International evidence also suggests that people arrested for sex offences, particularly child sex offences, appear to have a higher risk of committing suicide following police custody.
 Natural causes have been the most common known cause of deaths in police custody in England and Wales between 2004/05 and 2014/15, accounting for 51 per cent of deaths in this period. Drugs and/or alcohol also featured as causes in around half of deaths (49%). An even higher proportion of those who died had an association with drugs or alcohol (82%)

How does this support the view that it is racism that is killing black people in police custody?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly