Author Topic: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?  (Read 15547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?
« Reply #135 on: November 26, 2021, 05:44:22 PM »
He looks like a despicable specimen of (in)humanity.

He was out on $1000 bail, I think it was for assault.
So 5 people are dead & multiple injured thanks to that.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Alf

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?
« Reply #136 on: November 26, 2021, 08:22:33 PM »
He was out on $1000 bail, I think it was for assault.
So 5 people are dead & multiple injured thanks to that.
Of course technically  he’s just as innocent as Bruckner so I’m sure you must be equally supportive of his human rights.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?
« Reply #137 on: November 26, 2021, 09:05:32 PM »
Of course technically  he’s just as innocent as Bruckner so I’m sure you must be equally supportive of his human rights.

He could have been acting in self defence.

He saw the white xmas parade gatherers & since xmas is a tradition of white supremacy he sensed they were probably about to lynch him & he had to take action.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Alf

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?
« Reply #138 on: November 26, 2021, 10:23:20 PM »
He could have been acting in self defence.

He saw the white xmas parade gatherers & since xmas is a tradition of white supremacy he sensed they were probably about to lynch him & he had to take action.
Good job everyone in America is armed to the teeth to prevent these sorts of atrocities occurring.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?
« Reply #139 on: December 01, 2021, 03:45:48 PM »

During the trial MSNBC were barred from the court after a reporter was caught following the jury bus.

The police bodycam has been released, & MSNBC admit to telling a freelance journalist to follow the jury bus for information about the case.

Um, we — we — we were just trying to respectfully, um, just trying to see if it’s, um, if it’s possible to, um, to try and get any leads about — um — about the, the case, and so we were, we, uh, we were just keeping our distance, um, just to see, like, where, um, peop — people involved in — in the — in the trial, um, are positioned. By no means were we trying to get in contact with any of — any of the jury members or whoever’s in the car. We just were, um, trying to see, like, where, um, where key players in the trial may be at.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/kyle-rittenhouse-jury-bus-video-msnbc-b1967431.html

Luckily for them what they did was just within the law, because they didn't photograph or contact the jury.

But what possible information about the case could they have gleaned from following the jury?

I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or Self Defence?
« Reply #140 on: February 02, 2023, 10:29:12 AM »


Kyle Rittenhouse may have got away with reckless homicide on the grounds of self defence, but he's in big trouble for the coming civil suit filed by the father of one of his 'victim's. He's struggling to raise funds for his defence. Can't say I have much sympathy.

Lawsuit can proceed against Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse

A federal judge in Wisconsin ruled Wednesday that a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the father of a man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse during a protest in 2020 can proceed against Rittenhouse, police officers and others.

The father of Anthony Huber, one of two men shot and killed by Rittenhouse, filed the lawsuit in 2021, accusing officers of allowing for a dangerous situation that violated his son’s constitutional rights and resulted in his death. Anthony Huber’s father, John Huber, also alleged that Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shootings, conspired with law enforcement to cause harm to protestors. John Huber is seeking unspecified damages from city officials, officers and Rittenhouse.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman on Wednesday dismissed motions filed by Rittenhouse and the government defendants seeking to dismiss the civil rights lawsuit.

In allowing the case against Rittenhouse and the others to proceed, the judge said that Anthony Huber’s death “could plausibly be regarded as having been proximately caused by the actions of the governmental defendants.”

Rittenhouse attorney Shane Martin said in a phone interview that it’s important to note the ruling doesn’t address the merits of the case, it only allows it to proceed to the next phase.

“While we respect the judge’s decision, we do not believe there is any evidence of a conspiracy and we are confident, just as a Kenosha jury found, Kyle’s actions that evening were not wrongful and were undertaken in self defense,” Martin said.

Attorneys and private investigators for John Huber spent over 100 hours trying to locate Rittenhouse, tracking down addresses in seven states before they found the home of his mother and sister in Florida. The lawsuit was served on Rittenhouse’s sister, who said that he wasn’t home. Adelman said that was sufficient to qualify as being served.

Rittenhouse had argued that the case against him should be dismissed because he wasn’t properly served with the lawsuit. Adelman dismissed that, saying that Rittenhouse “is almost certainly evading service.”

“Rittenhouse has been deliberately cagey about his whereabouts,” Adelman wrote. “Although he denies living in Florida, he does not identify the place that he deems to be his residence.”

Attorneys for the law enforcement and government officials being sued did not immediately return emailed messages seeking comment.

The ruling puts Anthony Huber’s family “one step closer to justice for their son’s needless death,” said Anand Swaminathan, one of the attorneys for parents John Huber and Karen Bloom.

“The Kenosha officials that created a powder keg situation by their actions tried to claim that they cannot be held accountable for their unconstitutional conduct; that argument was soundly rejected today,” Swaminathan said in a statement.

Rittenhouse was charged with homicide, attempted homicide and reckless endangering for killing Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum and wounding a third person with an AR-style semi-automatic rifle in the summer of 2020 during a tumultuous night of protests over the shooting of a Black man, Jacob Blake, by a white Kenosha police officer.

Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges in November 2021 after testifying he acted in self-defense. Rittenhouse’s actions became a flashpoint in the debate over guns, vigil[ censored word]m and racial injustice in the U.S.

Rittenhouse went to Kenosha from his home in nearby Antioch, Illinois, after businesses were ransacked and burned in the nights that followed Blake’s shooting. He joined other armed civilians on the streets, carrying a weapon authorities said was illegally purchased for him because he was underage.

Rittenhouse first killed Rosenbaum, 36, in the parking lot of an auto dealership and as Rittenhouse ran from the scene he stumbled and fell. Anthony Huber, 26, struck Rittenhouse with his skateboard and tried to disarm him. Rittenhouse fell to the ground and shot Anthony Huber to death and wounded demonstrator Gaige Grosskreutz, 27.

This case is one of several ongoing civil lawsuits filed in the wake of the shootings. Grosskreutz last year filed a similar lawsuit against Rittenhouse.

Rittenhouse has maintained a high public profile, particularly on social media, where he is an outspoken advocate for gun rights. He has nearly 1 million followers on Twitter and has spoken at conservative gatherings.

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-legal-proceedings-kenosha-lawsuits-shootings-3bdc03586a45f1ebee16a3df8a5a4f63
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.