I wasn't gloating JP. (will give benefit of doubt on that)
Unfortunately I don't speak Spanish, but can you provide the link, as I know someone who can ?
Link already provided Stephen, if you look, but here it is again
http://www.elperiodico.com/es/noticias/sociedad/audiencia-barcelona-absuelve-guardias-civiles-policia-corrupcion-2127141On what grounds were they acquitted ? Prosecution failed to make a case.
Why was the metodo3 case closed ? Again, I provided a link (in English) which explains it in great detail . Good luck with the names!
http://www.catalannewsagency.com/politics/item/metodo-3-political-espionage-case-affecting-the-catalan-pp-leader-is-closedand their closure was nothing to do with their incompetence and lies ? Who knows - by this time Metodo 3 had ceased detective work and were not involved in "research" which clearly covers a multitude of sins.
Would you have employed metodo3 ? Personally, no because I cannot see any circumstances in which I would need their kind of services. But if I did, then yes, maybe.
and merely because people are acquitted, doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes. Of course, (and from what I know about Raso he and his brethren were not exactly in the George Dixon mould).
But it was
you who made a claim that they were convicted criminals. I am merely pointing out that you were mistaken.
Just seen your PS
P.S. JP.
Any comments on the second link I provided about the history of mccanns employing incompetent people, including crooks of course.
One after another............................
Hardly a one off, was it.
Here's a well known piece of advice.
' Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. '
Answer - First of all, Madeleine Foundation? That's a source right up there with Pat Brown and Morais!
Which ones referred to in that article are "crooks"? Halligen? When was he employed by the Mccanns? When was he conviced?
Sorry Stephen - I think the phrase "when in a hole, stop digging" applies to you here.
In spades