Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?

[kizzy]

The fact that Operation Grange is still being funded and that HCWhas confirmed that CB is still being treated as the prime and only suspect in the Madeleine McCann case for starters.  They say there is evidence, you say there is not.  I know whose opinion I value more on the matter and it’s not yours.   And finally, to your last point - can I refer you to the words of mine you quoted and highlighted in bold and agreed with so adamantly reply #714 , there is your answer.

HCWhas confirmed that CB is still being treated as the prime and only suspect in the Madeleine McCann case for starters.  They say there is evidence,

Oh right..............so if that's the case who are O. G. investigating then.

If HCW has has the evidence...to charge CB,

 

[Alf]

HCWhas confirmed that CB is still being treated as the prime and only suspect in the Madeleine McCann case for starters.  They say there is evidence,

Oh right..............so if that's the case who are O. G. investigating then.

If HCW has has the evidence...to charge CB,

I have no idea what OG are investigating specifically but they have I believe expressed support for the German investigation so perhaps they are offering support in their efforts?
Your last sentence makes no sense.  What are you trying to say?

[Eleanor]

I remain stunned by the fact that The Judges didn't even convict Breuckner for The Child Abuse Cases. Or would they prefer that an Appeal Court did that?

Under Age and No Voice.  This stinks.  This is Open License for the future.

[jassi]

Perhaps the evidence presented was nowhere as robust as was portrayed in the media.
The same may be true in Madeleine's case.

[Eleanor]

Perhaps the evidence presented was nowhere as robust as was portrayed in the media.
The same may be true in Madeleine's case.

I am not interested in Madeleine's Case at the moment.

But I am interested in a known and convicted paedophile being protected when it comes to small children, who don't deserve protection it seems, even in a Children's Play Park.

[jassi]

I am not interested in Madeleine's Case at the moment.

But I am interested in a known and convicted paedophile being protected when it comes to small children, who don't deserve protection it seems, even in a Children's Play Park.

The point remains, maybe the stories put about in the media don't exactly match the evidence.

[Eleanor]

The point remains, maybe the stories put about in the media don't exactly match the evidence.

Either they do or they don't. But Brueckner was arrested by a Portuguese Police Woman on one of these occasions and there were other witnesses.  Brueckner is dangerous.

[Alf]

Why hasn’t he been charged with possessing child porn images?  I know you only get a slap on the wrist for it these days but surely there’s enough evidence for this charge to stick?  Or is it “case dismissed “ because of the way the evidence was obtained?  In any case CB’s fan club need reminding that this is a man who collected thousands of depraved images of children for his own use and to share on the dark web so they might want to ask themselves why they are so apparently smug about him evading justice for these crimes.

[Alf]

The point remains, maybe the stories put about in the media don't exactly match the evidence.

The evidence was presented in court.  Are you claiming the media misreported what was given in evidence?

[Alf]

Either they do or they don't. But Brueckner was arrested by a Portuguese Police Woman on one of these occasions and there were other witnesses.  Brueckner is dangerous.

Imagine if, instead of it being CB, the exact same set of crimes were alleged to have been committed by one of the Tapas  7.  I mean as far as most sceptics are concerned the “crime” of twiddling a nipple in front of friends and family is enough to damn a man to everlasting online accusations of involvement in a child’s death, yet when a convicted rapist and child abuser is accused (and found not guilty) of said crimes we are supposed to simply forgive, forget and return our focus to the evil nipple twiddler and his mates, because the evidence there is soooooo much much more compelling .  Massive double standards at work as always. 

[kizzy]

I have no idea what OG are investigating specifically but they have I believe expressed support for the German investigation so perhaps they are offering support in their efforts?
Your last sentence makes no sense.  What are you trying to say?

What are you trying to say....more like


Three police forces disagree with your (uninformed) assessment.

How do you know if you don't know what they are investigating.

Your posts are the ones that don't make sense.

They say there is evidence, you say there is not.

If they have evidence ...why haven't they charged him ...

soz thought i posted this yesterday.

[kizzy]

Imagine if, instead of it being CB, the exact same set of crimes were alleged to have been committed by one of the Tapas  7.  I mean as far as most sceptics are concerned the “crime” of twiddling a nipple in front of friends and family is enough to damn a man to everlasting online accusations of involvement in a child’s death, yet when a convicted rapist and child abuser is accused (and found not guilty) of said crimes we are supposed to simply forgive, forget and return our focus to the evil nipple twiddler and his mates, because the evidence there is soooooo much much more compelling .  Massive double standards at work as always.

I think its your post that has the massive double standards it disgusting..

If you think that was ok what he did. in front of children...[makes u wonder what sort of adults they all were]


Wonder why the mccs never suspected any of them 7 even though some they barely knew.

[Alf]

What are you trying to say....more like


Three police forces disagree with your (uninformed) assessment.

How do you know if you don't know what they are investigating.

Your posts are the ones that don't make sense.

They say there is evidence, you say there is not.

If they have evidence ...why haven't they charged him ...

soz thought i posted this yesterday.

Oh dear, round and round in circles we go. 
Firstly the last sentence of your previous post made no sense.  That is a fact.  What were you trying to say?  You may not understand my posts but they are at least written in full sentences and are largely grammatically correct.
Secondly, how do I know that three police forces don’t agree with your assessment that the McCanns hid their child’s body?  Umm…perhaps because the McCanns are not being investigated for her disappearance and Christian Bruckner is, that’s quite a big clue.
Thirdly, “if they have evidence, why don’t they charge him” once again I refer to my post #713, the one you appeared to understand at the time but perhaps you need reminding?  Go back and read it, and also your reply to that post, then perhaps the penny will finally drop.

[Alf]

I think its your post that has the massive double standards it disgusting..

If you think that was ok what he did. in front of children...[makes u wonder what sort of adults they all were]


Wonder why the mccs never suspected any of them 7 even though some they barely knew.

LOL, thanks for proving my point.  Nipple twiddling = disgusting, depraved, shocking outrageous when it’s a member of the McCanns circle.  Rape, child sex abuse, images of child pornography on USB stick buried under a dead dog = not a single word of outrage or disgust or censure when it’s carried out by Sceptics’ favourite paedo CB. Is getting your dick out in front of little kids ok Kizzy?  According to the German courts it is, what say you?

[Wonderfulspam]

LOL, thanks for proving my point.  Nipple twiddling = disgusting, depraved, shocking outrageous when it’s a member of the McCanns circle.  Rape, child sex abuse, images of child pornography on USB stick buried under a dead dog = not a single word of outrage or disgust or censure when it’s carried out by Sceptics’ favourite paedo CB. Is getting your dick out in front of little kids ok Kizzy?  According to the German courts it is, what say you?

The German court who were in possession of ALL the evidence were quite satisfied Brueckner didn't commit any offence. The fact that you don't agree with their verdict, without having heard ALL ( which needs to be written in capital letters for some reason) the evidence, doesn't make it wrong.