The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[kizzy]

Come over to the Dark Side Eleanor, it’s so much more fun.

Always did think your not really interested. ...Its all just a joke......like your posts

[Vertigo Swirl]

Always did think your not really interested. ...Its all just a joke......like your posts

I’m very interested, especially in your views on why you think the McCanns needed protecting by the British Establishment and where they hid the body.  You’ve already persuaded me they’re guilty I just need to understand how they got away with it and am relying on you for insight and guidance.  Hope you can help!

[The General]

That’s no way to talk about a fellow McCann sceptic.  Even if you don’t agree with everything he says at least he is on the side of the angels, and Maddie.  Personally I think there really might be something in this “died before the 3rd” theory, let’s not dismiss it out of hand.  It all sounds pretty plausible and logical when you think about it.  Have you read his book?  It’s an epic.

I've read his book, as much as I could anyway. It's dogshit.
But you're right, we should try to support him as a fellow enlightened one.

[The General]

We often discuss the timeline, the timeline, the timeline.
But there's an alternate timeline, another reality.
Where's CB's timeline? He's not at liberty to elaborate, and he's strenuously denied being involved, or, indeed, even in the same county, but I don't see supporters putting too much effort into establishing his timeline, as we have attempting to establish the real timeline of the abduction fakers.

Come on members of the WRVS, show your working out. It's increasingly obvious that CB wasn't involved, and his recent exoneration only solidifies his position, so it is incumbent upon you to make a convincing argument, as it's yet to be even remotely elucidated.

[Vertigo Swirl]

We often discuss the timeline, the timeline, the timeline.
But there's an alternate timeline, another reality.
Where's CB's timeline? He's not at liberty to elaborate, and he's strenuously denied being involved, or, indeed, even in the same county, but I don't see supporters putting too much effort into establishing his timeline, as we have attempting to establish the real timeline of the abduction fakers.

Come on members of the WRVS, show your working out. It's increasingly obvious that CB wasn't involved, and his recent exoneration only solidifies his position, so it is incumbent upon you to make a convincing argument, as it's yet to be even remotely elucidated.

Phew!  I switched sides just in time.

[Brietta]

We often discuss the timeline, the timeline, the timeline.
But there's an alternate timeline, another reality.
Where's CB's timeline? He's not at liberty to elaborate, and he's strenuously denied being involved, or, indeed, even in the same county, but I don't see supporters putting too much effort into establishing his timeline, as we have attempting to establish the real timeline of the abduction fakers.

Come on members of the WRVS, show your working out. It's increasingly obvious that CB wasn't involved, and his recent exoneration only solidifies his position, so it is incumbent upon you to make a convincing argument, as it's yet to be even remotely elucidated.

The hugely redundant ''TIMELINE'' so beloved of those who have missed the salient point that it was RULED OUT of significance decades ago by ALL investigators with a modicum of understanding of the rule of law and investigative techniques.

There will be no timeline emanating from Brueckner who has vowed not to speak to the police investigators.

The closest we have to a timeline is Amaral's claim that Brueckner was eliminated from the inquiry during his watch.
Good starting point DID WE KNOW EXACTLY WHEN THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN. But we'll never know that, will we.

[The General]

The hugely redundant ''TIMELINE'' so beloved of those who have missed the salient point that it was RULED OUT of significance decades ago by ALL investigators with a modicum of understanding of the rule of law and investigative techniques.

There will be no timeline emanating from Brueckner who has vowed not to speak to the police investigators.

The closest we have to a timeline is Amaral's claim that Brueckner was eliminated from the inquiry during his watch.
Good starting point DID WE KNOW EXACTLY WHEN THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN. But we'll never know that, will we.

Typical. I ask for literally any timeline that puts CB anywhere in the vicinity. Or his verified movements. I'll take corroborated hearsay. Anything.
You've all ripped his history apart, even to the point of mapping his apparent journey from the Algarve to Germany in a 30 year old caboose, yet you can't proffer anything tangible that links him even tenuously.
We know his name was on a list that the PJ gave to the BKA, which was jolly dcent of the keystone cops, and I'll let you mention the thoroughly debunked phone pings and the hobo tales.
This is important work that you have all failed to do. We've poured over every minute detail and have come up with a number of plausible scenarios. You guys, meh, not so much. It's weak game after all these years whinging and greetin and attempted debunking.
There must be something, you can't just shrug and say 'uhhh, dunno', or rely on your latest messiah - look where that got you, hitching your wagon the HCW horse (and that's also very noticeably silent now post the trial)

...and stop shouting.

[Wonderfulspam]

According to Jon Clarke, Brueckner was 'outside' 5a on May 3rd. Which doesn't narrow things down a lot when you consider that anyone who wasn't inside 5a can be described as having been outside of it.

[The General]

According to Jon Clarke, Brueckner was 'outside' 5a on May 3rd. Which doesn't narrow things down a lot when you consider that anyone who wasn't inside 5a can be described as having been outside of it.

I have to admit that I too was outside of apartment 5a at the time.
CB may well have been in Lisbon at the time, but he was outside of 5a too.
I didn't see him though.
Guys, did anyone here see CB outside of 5a? We can probably put all this to bed before lunch.

[The General]

Phew!  I switched sides just in time.

More faces than the town hall clock you, girl.

[Vertigo Swirl]

More faces than the town hall clock you, girl.

No, just two.  Once a fierce defender of the Child Neglectors now a Born Again True Believer of Senor Doctor Amaral’s most excellent theory of the frozen cadaver. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I have to admit that I too was outside of apartment 5a at the time.
CB may well have been in Lisbon at the time, but he was outside of 5a too.
I didn't see him though.
Guys, did anyone here see CB outside of 5a? We can probably put all this to bed before lunch.

Yes I did, but that doesn’t mean he had anything to do with anything.  Pure coincidence.  He was on his phone at the time, and he did look a bit shifty admittedly.

[Admin]

According to Jon Clarke, Brueckner was 'outside' 5a on May 3rd. Which doesn't narrow things down a lot when you consider that anyone who wasn't inside 5a can be described as having been outside of it.

Who saw him because we already have statements from everyone who was in that area on that particular day?

[Lace]

Who saw him because we already have statements from everyone who was in that area on that particular day?

Phoning from his car maybe?

[The General]

Phoning from his car maybe?

If I recall correctly, which is difficult for me given my propensity to fabricate, CB was alleged to have received a lengthy phonecall from an unknown / untraceable 'burner' phone around the time of the 'abduction'.
This call 'pinged' a Luz mast, which, it transpires, means the phone could be anywhere in an 4.5 km radius, or 63km2 (an area the size of Brighton)