Author Topic: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?  (Read 168101 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #975 on: November 29, 2024, 05:21:20 PM »
It's a rum bunch who would rather protect the guilty parent of an abused and murdered child than the child themselves but I suppose it takes all sorts.
Says the woman who has busted a gut on this forum supporting the murderer of a teenage girl whilst desperately pointing the finger at the poor girl’s relatives.  Your hypocrisy never fails to entertain.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #976 on: November 29, 2024, 05:22:25 PM »
Just more or less said the same thing.
Great minds think alike eh Kizzy?  Now, about those defrosted bodily fluids…

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #977 on: November 29, 2024, 05:32:25 PM »
Great minds think alike eh Kizzy?  Now, about those defrosted bodily fluids…

Seems G.A. never got the chance to complete the investigation on them.


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #978 on: November 29, 2024, 06:06:42 PM »
Seems G.A. never got the chance to complete the investigation on them.
And yet as Faithlilly pointed out his successor continued down the path that Amaral was on so what stopped him investigating the defrosted bodily fluids?  Oh wait, I forgot!  It was the dastardly Brits, protecting those McCanns again.  Silly me.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #979 on: November 29, 2024, 06:32:09 PM »
And yet as Faithlilly pointed out his successor continued down the path that Amaral was on so what stopped him investigating the defrosted bodily fluids?  Oh wait, I forgot!  It was the dastardly Brits, protecting those McCanns again.  Silly me.

What you like........silly billy

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #980 on: November 29, 2024, 07:11:16 PM »
What you like........silly billy
Any thoughts on why the British Government were so keen to protect the McCanns?  Do you suspect some high level paedo ring, or perhaps Masonic involvement, or maybe it was Gerry’s top secret work at Porton Down?  Whatever it was the McCanns must have enormous influence at a very high level at least we can both agree on that.  Who’da thunk it of two seemingly ordinary doctors?!

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #981 on: January 27, 2025, 11:27:52 AM »
Any thoughts on why the British Government were so keen to protect the McCanns?  Do you suspect some high level paedo ring, or perhaps Masonic involvement, or maybe it was Gerry’s top secret work at Porton Down?  Whatever it was the McCanns must have enormous influence at a very high level at least we can both agree on that.  Who’da thunk it of two seemingly ordinary doctors?!





Well strangely enough I don't think It is the mccs who are being protected.

My thoughts on that is -   its more likely  DP.

forgot to press send on this at the time... but due to discussion elsewhere decided to post.

Offline Lace

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #982 on: January 27, 2025, 11:47:09 AM »




Well strangely enough I don't think It is the mccs who are being protected.

My thoughts on that is -   its more likely  DP.

forgot to press send on this at the time... but due to discussion elsewhere decided to post.

Oh give over!!

Offline Lace

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #983 on: January 27, 2025, 11:51:05 AM »
No one was being protected.  Amaral said the British were against him earlier on he said the British agreed with him.  Which is it?  He made out the McCann's were being protected when he was taken off the case.  An excuse for messing uo the case.  Poor me.

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #984 on: January 27, 2025, 12:06:20 PM »
No one was being protected.  Amaral said the British were against him earlier on he said the British agreed with him.  Which is it?  He made out the McCann's were being protected when he was taken off the case.  An excuse for messing uo the case.  Poor me.
Don't be so hard on yourself, you're doing OK.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #985 on: January 27, 2025, 01:19:31 PM »
So much emphasis on the children so happy so angelic had such a great day such a great time such a happy family all this positive is over the top.....far too much minor detail/observance...especially from a male.

It seems to me reading it he expected the kids were in some sort of trouble ...or why mention that they wasnt.

this statement was made almost a year later. 11/04/2008

 Gerry's just obviously finishing off playing tennis and err so you know hopefully try and get them down and as I say we were just, you know I, I know, it does sound bizarre but I just looked at the three of them and I couldn't, you know they were just so well presented and so clean and immaculate it was, you know I was, and you know they just looked such healthy children, err you know, there's, there's you know nothing that normally''

1485 "Yeah.'
 00:38:36 Reply "Triggers in my mind like that but it was just how well that they looked and err''

1485 "Try to remember where in, where they were in the apartment.'

Reply "Err, I mean the, the time that I was there err you know all, all of them err all the children and Kate were in the, err as soon as you go through the patio doors err you know they were all in the immediate area you know in front of you, err that was the area that they generally, you know when I saw them, so I didn't, no I didn't go any further into the apartment, you know it was just a conversation that I like, you know walked into the, you know through the French doors, I went into the lounge err you know the open plan area and err you know just had a brief conversation, you know things started off by as I say, saying about the, how well they looked and you know, it's early to get them ready for bed and then I said oh Gerry's, you know just finished over there, we're going over to play a bit of tennis, err I probably said is there any problems with that and she said ah no, no fine, you know carry on, and err you know perhaps a bit more of a conversation err but you know it, it wasn't many minutes that I was, was there.'

1485 "Yeah.'
 00:39:55 Reply "But err certainly enough time just to see, you know, certainly the apartment, there was nothing that was untoward, that was you know err the children all looked extremely happy, there was no, you know signs of any problems with err you know Kate, you know or indeed the relationship that Kate had got with any of the three children. None of the children had been told off, none of the children looked like they were you know in trouble for anything, you know they were err still all talking and playing around. Err so you know it was just a very err transient you know that I'd gone in there, but as I say it just struck me how well they all looked.'

1485 "Yeah.'
 Reply "And content I suppose is the other word to use.'

1485 "Did you actually go into the apartment''
 Reply "I did.'

1485 "Or did you do the conversation from the door''
 Reply "No, definitely was inside the apartment, you know whether it be two or three steps into the apartment or you know however many, but I was definitely in the apartment.'

00:41:00 1485 "Okay, so now what I'm gonna try and ask you to recollect, what everybody was wearing.'
 Reply "I'm afraid that is, you know I'm, I cannot recall at all. I know that's, you'd think that'd be an obvious thing to remember, I cannot remember. As I say the, from the children point of view predominantly I can remember the, you know, white, but I couldn't say exactly what they were wearing. Err''
 1485 "But could you remember what Kate was wearing for example''
 Reply "I can't, no.'

1485 "And did you actually set eyes on each individual child''
 Reply "All three children I saw, yeah.'

1485 "And were they standing up' Sitting down''
 Reply "Err they were generally standing up, yeah.'

1485 "Did they actually acknowledge you''
 Reply "Err oh yeah, you know I'm very sure that if you'd have asked them, you know that evening or the next day they'd all say ah yeah, I popped in. You know I, you know I did know the children very well, we'd all you know, met up many times before err you know I, you know again I'd be playing with Madeleine you know in the, err the play area err you know during that week, you know lifting her up, twizzing her round and everything, I knew her that well, you know, to do that, and as I say err she'd definitely know who I was and certainly, as I say, just to reinforce that she looked very happy.'

1485 "Yeah. Was that the last time you saw Madeleine''


Wonder why kmcc wasn't happy about going on the holiday in the first place,

Offline Brietta

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #986 on: January 27, 2025, 01:32:10 PM »
So much emphasis on the children so happy so angelic had such a great day such a great time such a happy family all this positive is over the top.....far too much minor detail/observance...especially from a male.

It seems to me reading it he expected the kids were in some sort of trouble ...or why mention that they wasnt.

this statement was made almost a year later. 11/04/2008

 Gerry's just obviously finishing off playing tennis and err so you know hopefully try and get them down and as I say we were just, you know I, I know, it does sound bizarre but I just looked at the three of them and I couldn't, you know they were just so well presented and so clean and immaculate it was, you know I was, and you know they just looked such healthy children, err you know, there's, there's you know nothing that normally''

1485 "Yeah.'
 00:38:36 Reply "Triggers in my mind like that but it was just how well that they looked and err''

1485 "Try to remember where in, where they were in the apartment.'

Reply "Err, I mean the, the time that I was there err you know all, all of them err all the children and Kate were in the, err as soon as you go through the patio doors err you know they were all in the immediate area you know in front of you, err that was the area that they generally, you know when I saw them, so I didn't, no I didn't go any further into the apartment, you know it was just a conversation that I like, you know walked into the, you know through the French doors, I went into the lounge err you know the open plan area and err you know just had a brief conversation, you know things started off by as I say, saying about the, how well they looked and you know, it's early to get them ready for bed and then I said oh Gerry's, you know just finished over there, we're going over to play a bit of tennis, err I probably said is there any problems with that and she said ah no, no fine, you know carry on, and err you know perhaps a bit more of a conversation err but you know it, it wasn't many minutes that I was, was there.'

1485 "Yeah.'
 00:39:55 Reply "But err certainly enough time just to see, you know, certainly the apartment, there was nothing that was untoward, that was you know err the children all looked extremely happy, there was no, you know signs of any problems with err you know Kate, you know or indeed the relationship that Kate had got with any of the three children. None of the children had been told off, none of the children looked like they were you know in trouble for anything, you know they were err still all talking and playing around. Err so you know it was just a very err transient you know that I'd gone in there, but as I say it just struck me how well they all looked.'

1485 "Yeah.'
 Reply "And content I suppose is the other word to use.'

1485 "Did you actually go into the apartment''
 Reply "I did.'

1485 "Or did you do the conversation from the door''
 Reply "No, definitely was inside the apartment, you know whether it be two or three steps into the apartment or you know however many, but I was definitely in the apartment.'

00:41:00 1485 "Okay, so now what I'm gonna try and ask you to recollect, what everybody was wearing.'
 Reply "I'm afraid that is, you know I'm, I cannot recall at all. I know that's, you'd think that'd be an obvious thing to remember, I cannot remember. As I say the, from the children point of view predominantly I can remember the, you know, white, but I couldn't say exactly what they were wearing. Err''
 1485 "But could you remember what Kate was wearing for example''
 Reply "I can't, no.'

1485 "And did you actually set eyes on each individual child''
 Reply "All three children I saw, yeah.'

1485 "And were they standing up' Sitting down''
 Reply "Err they were generally standing up, yeah.'

1485 "Did they actually acknowledge you''
 Reply "Err oh yeah, you know I'm very sure that if you'd have asked them, you know that evening or the next day they'd all say ah yeah, I popped in. You know I, you know I did know the children very well, we'd all you know, met up many times before err you know I, you know again I'd be playing with Madeleine you know in the, err the play area err you know during that week, you know lifting her up, twizzing her round and everything, I knew her that well, you know, to do that, and as I say err she'd definitely know who I was and certainly, as I say, just to reinforce that she looked very happy.'

1485 "Yeah. Was that the last time you saw Madeleine''


Wonder why kmcc wasn't happy about going on the holiday in the first place,

The topic of this thread is
Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?

Do please make the effort if you understand the forum protocol regarding
  • On Topic posting
  • Posting topics without Libel or innuendo of Libel
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #987 on: January 27, 2025, 01:46:03 PM »
The topic of this thread is
Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?

Do please make the effort if you understand the forum protocol regarding
  • On Topic posting
  • Posting topics without Libel or innuendo of Libel
If I was so inclined I could find 3 dozens instances in the last month.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2025, 02:16:19 PM by Brietta »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #988 on: January 27, 2025, 02:27:27 PM »
The topic of this thread is
Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?

Do please make the effort if you understand the forum protocol regarding
  • On Topic posting
  • Posting topics without Libel or innuendo of Libel

Well I think what we have learned new is there have been countless suspects who have all resulted in zilch charges - of the abduction of Maddie.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #989 on: January 27, 2025, 03:38:40 PM »
Have they learned anything new in almost 18 years.


The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) received up to £192,000 in 2024–2025 for the investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance. This was granted by the Home Office through special grant funding.

So who is looking for Maddie now - what is the special grant funding being spent on

How is this being spent...latest figures

ByMartin FrickerSenior Reporter
09:47, 23 Dec 2024
|
Bookmark
A fighting fund set up to help find Madeleine McCann has seen its value soar to over £1m for the first time since the year after she disappeared.

The bulk of the value of the ‘Madeleine’s Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Ltd’ fund has been invested in stocks and shares. The portfolio increased from £848,305 to £955,334 in the 12 months up to March this year thanks to stock market successes.

The total value of the fund is now £1,028,753, up from £921,819 a year ago. It is the first time it has exceeded £1m since 2008, when hundreds of thousands of pounds were being donated by well-wishers.