The Defence Will State Their Case

[[...]]

Well this image has to say it all......  I knew I'd seen the Forensic Officers at the bay window on the ground Floor Level of Canygne Road....

You have 2 questions here..... Why are they Forensically testing what is supposed to be Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat on 24/25th December 2010... when he was just simply a neigbour at this time.... But to me I don't think that it it Dr vincent Tabak's Flat... I do not think Dr Vincent Tabak lived on the Ground floor.... I think Flat 1 Was vacant or adjoined the other basement/ground floor flat....

And the reason's I say are two fold...

The Forensic Officers would not be testing the outside of the Bay Window for any Forensics.. even if it was Dr Vincent Tabak's and even if it was after they arrested him... (which it is not)... because Dr vincent Tabak didn't exit his house via a Bay Window .....

Now I'm going to put the image together with the original video clip i showed everyone of the back of Canygne Road... And I am almost positive that Joanna Yeates had the ground Floor and Dr Vincent Tabak lived in the main house ....


A description from The Video clip on The Getty site...


Notice the date.... 24th December  2010... This is December ... Now why are 'Forensic Officers " anywhere near the Flat that they claimed Dr Vincent Tabak lived.. ??? He wasn't a suspect until 31st December 2010 when the infamous Holland interview took place...  Dr Vincent Tabak is away at this time in Cambridge...

So... did they start collect forensics against Dr Vincent Tabak befre time.... OR... Did Joanna Yeates Live in that Flat???? 


Is that why we have this video.... http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/656385638 of the back of Canygne Road... It was where Joanna Yeates lived??? And because The Intercom Plate only said Flat 1.. maybe that was why they removed it????


here is the clip I got the Bay window image from.... it's at 1 second....!!!

Also from the description....
What were they taking from the window ????? And why were they there ????

Just watched the clip again... It looks like they are sweeping something from the window bottom??

EDIT... I just want to add this.....  Maybe it was a communal Flat.... ????

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1342427/Joanna-Yeates-murder-Landlord-Chris-Jefferies-hold-key.html#ixzz4qUjPWDCB

If Dr Vincent Tabak didn't live in the ground floor flat.... how could he carry Joanna Yeates to his flat without being seen... up the stairs of the Main House??????

This gets weirder.... I didn't think it possible !!!!!

The next Clip says :


Joanna Yeates murder:


Flowers laid outside flat/prayer vigil at church
Joanna Yeates murder: Flowers laid outside flat/prayer vigil at church; ENGLAND: Somerset: Bristol: EXT Windows of flat shared by murder victim Joanna Yeates and her boyfriend Greg Reardon / building housing flat where Joanna Yeates lived / building with police incident van parked outside / garden gate and path leading to front door of flat / message on flowers left at entrance to flats / flat of Joanna Yeates and Greg Reardon

...
There is no need for the media to start zooming into The Bay window on the 28th December 2010....

EXT Windows of flat shared by murder victim Joanna Yeates and her boyfriend Greg Reardon

Why if The Forensic Officers did Forensics on The Bay Windows and The Media saying that those Windows are from the Flat that Joanna Yeates shared with her boyfriend.... Have we been told that this is Dr Vincent Tabak's flat???

When did they decide to tell the world that Dr Vincent Tabak lived there??

And more importantly... why when we have the video tour of the Flat... do we not get to go to the bay windows ??? Are the red shelves blocking an entrance???

I find it odd, that the media seemed aware of the Flat and what windows were to what Flat.... Obviously we cannot say that the media were mistaken, as the Forensics on the 24th/25th December on the bay windows goes to support that the windows must have belonged to Joanna Yeates ....

How are those Flats layed out.... This is not the first time I have asked this question!!!!


http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/691696914

[[...]]

This is news to me .... "Bristol Post... 20th August 2017.... !!!!

Why have they started again telling untruths this late in the day ???? The article is dated ... 20th August 2017 !!!

They had arrested CJ before Dr Vincent Tabak made the phone call....  What is going on here ????
 

Well Greg didn't ring them until the Monday Morning..... Why is the Bristol Post having a Dr Vincent Tabak day ?????

Why are The Bristol Post telling an untruth about Holland and Dr Vincent Tabak's phone call being one of the reasons CJ was arrested ???!!!


CJ was arrested on the 30th December 2010.... according to DCI Phil Jones ,Dr Vincent Tabak had seen CJ's arrest on TV whilst he was in Holland and that was what apparently prompted the phone call... There is no evidence provided in court to prove whether it was actually Dr Vincent Tabak who made the phone call or Tanja Morson!!!


Edit.... Just incase The Bristol Post is reading..... read the whole subject matter.... Then you tell me whether Dr Vincent Tabak was illegally questioned in Holland on the 31st December 2010... Because as sure as  eggs is eggs DC Karen Thomas should have cautioned Dr Vincent Tabak in Holland..... In her 6 hour interview... They questioned him as a suspect.... (IMO)...

Ask Ann Reddrop.... she'd planned Dr Vincent Tabak's arrest since late December 2010.... Well... what date was that exactly Ann!!!!!!

Start doing some journalistic work and look at "Bob The Builder"... And ask yourself why he "Contaminates The Crime scene"... Then ask yourself... why on gods earth the Police employed "Bob The Builder " in the first place... when "Forensic Officers were needed to follow protocol and keep a 'Crime Scene" UNCONTAMINATED!!


http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/crimes-shook-bristol-jo-yeates-349034


AH... Has The Tree been shook ???

Here also 2nd August 2017.....

Next door was a perverted fantasist named Vincent Tabak. The Dutchman’s infatuation with Joanna and his obsession with internet images showing chilling depictions of women being choked proved to be a fatal combination. Joanna’s partially clothed, frozen body was found at a roadside in Somerset on Christmas Day in 2010, eight days after she had been reported missing.

Dear Daily Mail.....

I will try and excuse your ignorance.... But as The Porn was never brought to The trial of Dr Vincent Tabak it isn't Evidence,....

There was NO Proof That Dr Vincent Tabak was addicted to Pornography.... No Images , video's were shown in Court of his apparent obsession with Strangulation Porn.... So how do you know it exists???

Your Headline and I will quote...

Killed by porn: Six women and girls whose lives were horrifically snuffed out by men addicted to vile pornography and seeking to reenact it in the most chilling fashion

States that he is amongst many addicted to porn... Where was the evidence to prove that Dr Vincent Tabak tried to re-enact this pornography????

I don't know about you.... But I personally would like the evidence that this was the case .... Hasn't anyone learnt anything after the CJ debarcle??  It's easy to make a monster out of a person who cannot defend themselves... And any amount of untruths can be told....

I have a problem even believing the NONE Evidence that was brought to trial....  please read the posts on this forum and come back again with a better answer... And tell me whether you really believe the garbage that has been said from day one .....

Maybe you know whether Joanna Yeates lived in the whole of the ground floor flat.... Forensics were a bit too quick, Forensically testing the bay window, before Dr Vincent Tabak was ever considered a suspect.... But maybe you should ask good old Ann about that one.....

Please show me your evidence to support your story...

PS... Joanna Yeates was fully clothed.... as stated several times by DCI Phil Jones !!

Regards   Nine...Again


We do appear to be having a month of it at the moment..... !!!



 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4755176/The-women-girls-killed-men-addicted-pornography.html#ixzz4qandn6Ar

[[...]]

August 6, 2017 (modified 7 August 2017 | 10:24)
© RESTRICTED PLAYBACK

OMG... We even have the Italian online papers talking all things Dr Vincent Tabak.... !! It has been translated ......

The missing serial killer"
Even when, in February, he collapsed in front of the prison priest, Tabak admits that he had promised aggression. At the trial, during the five hours spent at the witness desk, his hands clinging to the podium, he claims to have seen Joanna greet the kitchen window and interpret it as an invitation to enter. She insists she did not want to kill her, tried to kiss her and panicked, screaming. But the jurors do not believe him: a tall young man over a meter and ninety does not cling to the neck of a girl much more fragile than he does to "take away his life," by chance.
Just over three weeks after the beginning of the debate, on October 28, 2011, the defendant is sentenced to life imprisonment.
Immediately afterwards it emerges that there was violent pornographic material in his PCs, video and pictures of affectionate and strangely ladies. Details omitted during the trial because the judge had ruled that Tabak's sexual life was not relevant. According to many criminologists, however, if it had not been captured, Joanna's assassination could have been the first in the career of a serial killer.

Whats going on NOW... For Dr Vincent Tabak to be appearing in an Italian online issue... when I don't think it would have been big news in Italy.....

And certainly Not Now !!

Is someone about to open this case up?????

Would you like to comment Paolo Beltramin ??


http://www.corriere.it/cronache/17_agosto_03/corpo-joanna-yeates-sotto-neve-assassino-porta-accanto-jefferies-femminicidio-beltramin-20923a48-788c-11e7-8ef0-c9b41f95269b.shtml

[Leonora]

August 6, 2017 (modified 7 August 2017 | 10:24)
© RESTRICTED PLAYBACK

OMG... We even have the Italian online papers talking all things Dr Vincent Tabak.... !! It has been translated ......

Whats going on NOW... For Dr Vincent Tabak to be appearing in an Italian online issue... when I don't think it would have been big news in Italy.....

And certainly Not Now !!

Is someone about to open this case up?????

Would you like to comment Paolo Beltramin ??

http://www.corriere.it/cronache/17_agosto_03/corpo-joanna-yeates-sotto-neve-assassino-porta-accanto-jefferies-femminicidio-beltramin-20923a48-788c-11e7-8ef0-c9b41f95269b.shtml

What a scoop! The Italian connection is the celebrated murder of a young British university student in Perugia three years before Joanna Yeates was murdered in Bristol. Each of these cases is the subject of a film shown by Netflix. The only person whose conviction still stands for the Italian murder was tried behind closed doors, had no history of violence, and was convicted on the basis of DNA at the crime scene which could have been planted there to incriminate him. I believe Paolo Beltramin may have been tipped off by the killer of both victims to distract attention from the fact that the prosecutors in both cases invented lurid sexual motives for which there was no actual evidence.

[[...]]

What a scoop! The Italian connection is the celebrated murder of a young British university student in Perugia three years before Joanna Yeates was murdered in Bristol. Each of these cases is the subject of a film shown by Netflix. The only person whose conviction still stands for the Italian murder was tried behind closed doors, had no history of violence, and was convicted on the basis of DNA at the crime scene which could have been planted there to incriminate him. I believe Paolo Beltramin may have been tipped off by the killer of both victims to distract attention from the fact that the prosecutors in both cases invented lurid sexual motives for which there was no actual evidence.

Leonora... Never even thought about the Italian connection, that you have spoken about....

What is going on?

[[...]]

This Bay Window business, is really bugging me... Not only the Bay window but the back of the house...

Where did Dr Vincent Tabak live ???

Where did Joanna Yeates live ????

I know we are supposed to know the answer to those 2 questions, but I don't now !!

I look at the date when they first were doing Forensic's on The bay Window, and there are two clips...  The first clip I has mentioned before,Is dated the 24th December 2010.... I had seen that one of the Forensic officers points to the other to work on the Bay Window and the clip shows her painting some black material upon it....

The second clip is dated the 25th December 2010... But part of it's description is the 24th December 2010... I believe that the media used part of the clip from the 24th December 2010.... The images from clip 659296240 are the same as the images from clip 659120944 which I have attached images from ....

Chief Superintendent Jon Stratford himself is interviewed outside Canygne Road on the 24th December 2010... I believe the third clip is a continuation of the other clip from the 24th December 2010, as we have the Officers rummaging through the rubbish.... Chief Superintendent Jon Stratford goes on to say:

There's nothing other than the fact she's disappeared, there is nothing to suggest that she has come to harm at the current time. So we need to be careful, we need to make sure we don't speculate, but obviously our Detectives are Investigating ever possible, erm, explanation for her disappearance.

So if Joanna Yeates is just a "Missing Person" on the 24th December 2010....  Why are they 'Forensically Examining the Bay Window... The only reason for this is that it is "Joanna Yeates Flat".....

They wouldn't need to Forensically Examine any body elses windows for a "Missing Person"... Even though the "Forensic Examination", tells us something Far More Serious has happened to Joanna Yeates....

This information I cannot stress how Important it is.... we are talking the 24th December 2010 !!

We are talking a time of a "Missing Person".... we have No Murder at this point.. We have the Police clearly working on the Bay Window on the 24th December 2010... WHY???

It has got to be Joanna Yeates Flat....
There is NO Other explanation for it at this time !!  And if Joanna Yeates was in the whole of the ground floor ... where was Dr Vincent Tabak....  Why has CJ NOT said anything ????


What did the Jury see on their tour ???? Did they go into the Bay windowed area ???  Did they only see what we have seen on the Video of the tour of Joanna Yeates flat....

You have one last possibility with the Bay Window... DC Karen Thomas rang Dr Vincent Tabak on the 24th December 2010... I never understood, why she made this phone call when he was away in Cambridge... But she did..
Had she called Dr Vincent Tabak to ask Permission to "Forensically Test".. The Bay Window on the ground floor???

You can only have this as the outcome if there were indeed 2 flats on the ground floor level.... Which then flies in the face of DC Karen Thomas claiming that Dr Vincent Tabak was too interested in Forensics.....


OMG.... That has to be it..... Dr Vincent Tabak's Over Interest in Forensics... she had asked his Permission to Forensically examine The Bay Window and he obliged .... So when he starts asking her about The Forensics at the property which she has asked him if it's ok to perform.. in the NOW Infamous Holland Interview... she turns it around and pretends he has an over Interest in Forensics.... So as to give the public her supposed reason for testing Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA..... (IMO)..


DC Karen Thomas .... Is that how it went ???????  Did The Dutchman help you and then you used it against him ???? Please answer me that !!!

The Placid Dutchman whom you have all pretended was, manipulating, Calculated, trying to keep one step ahead of the Investigation....

He wasn't was he.... You had brought him into the Investigation by asking for his assistance... didn't you !!!! (IMO)...


So people which one is it......

(A): Joanna yeates Lived In The  Ground Floor including the Bay Window... Or..

(B): DC Karen Thomas asked Dr Vincent Tabak if it would be ok to test his Bay Window just in case a perpetrator had touched his window looking for where Joanna yeates lived ????

And if as has been said Dr Vincent Tabak was trying to keep one step ahead of this Investigation why would he give the Police Permission to test The Bay Window???


You also have to take into account if you go with (A):... The Dr Vincent Tabak could not have had 2 bedrooms in his Ground Floor Flat... making it impossible for him to put Joanna Yeates on the bed in his second bedroom !!!

Going back to The date the 24th December 2010... The Police must have had Good Reason, to believe a "Serious Crime had taken place... To be Forensically testing that Bay Window at that time .... ..(IMO)...

Did the Police turn round what Dr Vincent Tabak was asking about regards The Forensics that had been going on in his Flat... Just like they turned around The Phone Call about helping CJ move The Car off The Drive ??

http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/659296240
http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/659120944
http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/659221024




[attachment deleted by admin]

[[...]]

Thought I'd share this video of DCI Phil Jones outside Bristol Crown Court..

His facial expressions say a great deal..... (IMO)

http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/688209604

[[...]]

Why is DCI Jones squirming throughout  Ann Reddrop's statement to The media... He looks extremely uncomfortable...

She even asks him before she starts her statement if he is "OK"... which he replies "Yer"..

For 2:25 The other Police Officer expression rarely changes... yet DCI Phil Jones face contorts regularly... WHY??


http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/688209048

[[...]]

I have just read this on twitter ....

Criminal Appeals‏ @C4CrimAppeals  3h3 hours ago
More
 In England & Wales, trial recordings are destroyed after just 7yrs & transcripts cost thousands of £s. Meanwhile in Louisiana.. #OpenJustice

If that is the case ... Then Dr Vincent Tabak is up the swanny without a proverbal paddle..... 

If no-one can locate Dr Vincent Tabak... And no-one is taking on this case there is 14 months to obtain these transcripts before they are destroyed....

Well I am sure that will suit a lot of people won't it!

But it will not change the fact that we have found discrepancies in this case from start to finish!! (IMO)...

[[...]]

I have found something I do not quite understand.... It appears to be Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat and indeed i was pointed to it as such from 'WebSlueths...

I only have a description.....

Letting information:
Furnishing:   Unfurnished
Added on Rightmove:   04 May 2011 (2305 days ago)
Key features
clifton Flat Unfurnished Property Driveway Parking Available 2 Bedrooms 1 Reception Medium Sized Garden 1 Bathroom
Full description
We are pleased to offer this newly refurbished lower ground floor flat in this imposing period property located on one of Clifton s most sought after residential roads. The flat offers two well proportioned double bedrooms, a very spacious living/dining room with a bay window and feature fireplace, a newly installed bathroom with a shower over the bath, galley style kicthen and an adjoining utility room with the appliances. The flat is newly carpeted and decorated throughout, is offered on an unfurnished basis and further benefits from use of the rear garden and an allocated off street parking space.

I have screenshot the information because it always has a habit of disappearing....

This is extremely odd... The advert date is The 4th May 2011... The property has been fully refurbished.... How long does that take ????

When were all of Dr Vincent Tabak's possessions taken from the flat??

When were all of Tanja Morson's possessions taken from the flat...??

4th May 2011..... Who did the refurbishment ??? These things take time ??? Dr Vincent Tabak hasn't entered any type of Plea yet... we have his home, refurbished and on the market quick sharp!!!

What happened to the defence taking photographs etc of Dr Vincent Tabak's home to show how difficult it would be to carry a body to the spare bedroom.....


So Dr Vincent Tabak was the owner of The Bay Window...... So come on Now DCI Phil Jones... explain to me exactly how you managed to NOT only do Forensics on The Outside of Dr Vincent Tabak Bay Window on The 24th December 2010... But state after Trial that Dr Vincent Tabak was a Suspect within 10 day's of Joanna Yeates being found ??? But did you get a warrant to perform this invasive task???

You stated that you suspected Dr Vincent Tabak , within 10 days of Joanna Yeates being found....  Well.. in my mind you must have located her sooner than you would have us believe... You are actively pursuing Dr Vincent Tabak on the 24th December 2010 by having The Forensic Officers testing Dr Vincent Tabak's Bay Window...

Again if he was a "SUSPECT"... then your Holland Interview should have included a "Caution"..... (IMO)...

And DC Karen Thomas is telling untruths about Dr Vincent Tabak's over Interest in Forensic's being the reason that she suspected Dr Vincent Tabak.... Because you obviously suspected him of something on the 24th December 2010... or else you wouldn't be doing 'Forensics" on The Bay Window...... (IMO).... !!!

Why is everyone so confident to refurbish this property at this point in time ????? 

In my mind you are totally admitting that there is No DNA Evidence In Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat whatsoever.... You are admitting this because ..The Defence obviously does not need to examine for themselves Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat....

This is quite disturbing (IMO)... Did Bob The Builder come round and re-jig the entire interior of the ground floor??

Did Joanna Yeates really have a Bay Window to start with, and changes took place???  I really need to understand what took place at Dr Vincent Tabaks Flat by 4th May 2011???

You see that date should have maybe been OK... because everyone was expecting Dr Vincent Tabak to appear in court on that day... But the venue and date changed... didn't it!

So no "Guilty Plea"... No NOTHING!

It also smacks of someone already being aware of what Plea Dr Vincent Tabak was going to make.... (IMO).... 

How has this property been rushed to be refurbished... Smack Bang in the middle of a "Murder Case "???
If I were Dr Vincent Tabak I would want my Defence Team to go around to where I lived and test everything.....

DCI Phil Jones.... No Forensic DNA , finger prints or anything whatsoever in Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat?????  Nothing of Interest whatsoever in The Flat That Dr Vincent Tabak lived at ?????

Because there can't be if this Flat is back on the Market in record time ....(IMO)!!!!!

Edit.... another question,.... what was the date of this advert for Joanna Yeates Flat??   

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-27696067.html   of Joanna Yeates flat????

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-29859883.html   Flat 2

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?129675-UK-Joanna-Yeates-25-Clifton-Bristol-17-Dec-2010-13/page28


Edit.... Who owned Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat ????  Because I have never been sure... even though people have said it was CJ..???

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8424.msg421095#msg421095
 

[attachment deleted by admin]

[[...]]

Now this is where things get Interesting,.......

They then briefly saw the garden flat where defendant Vincent Tabak lived
before spending 22 minutes next door at Jo’s home.

What did taking the Jury around to Dr Vincent Tabak's Refurbished Flat achieve ?????

Did Dr Vincent Tabak live in The Ground Floor Flat?????

Who had become the new tenant to allow a Jury to visit????

This is irregular (IMO).... How can The jury have a clear understanding of Dr Vincent Tabak's movement, if the flat he supposedly lived in had been refurbished by the 4Th May 2011?
And The Trial was in October 2011??

Did Dr Vincent Tabak actually live in the main house... ????

Are we back to The Bay Window belonging to Joanna Yeates ?????

Edit..... Was Two Bedrooms created for this flat when it was refurbished ?????? I would expect a Defence Lawyer to suggest that............

Therefore creating reasonable doubt in the juries mind ....(IMO)...


Double Edit... This is the video of them Forensically testing the Bay Window.. The caption says that it is Joanna Yeates Flat!!!

Missing woman Joanna Yeates: police find body; Missing woman Joanna Yeates: police find body
24.12.2010 Bristol: Clifton: Police forensic investigators (wearing protective suits) searching windows of flat where Joanna Yeates lived Police officers searching through rubbish in bins Back view forensic officer taking evidence from window
Restrictions
Restrictions: No use by regional TV or radio in UK and Ireland until 3 days after date of creation. Prior approval required if clip features ITN newsreader or reporter, please contact your local Getty Images representative.
Details
Credit: ITN
Clip #: 659120944SD
Collection: ITN
Date created: 25 December, 2010
Licence type: Rights-ready
Release info: Not released. More information
Clip length: 00:00:09:23
Location: United Kingdom
Mastered to: QuickTime 8-bit Photo-JPEG SD 720x576 25i More information
Originally shot on: 576 25i

http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/659120944

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/833591/jurors-visit-tragic-jo-yeates-flat/

[attachment deleted by admin]

[[...]]

The real question now is......

Who's Bay Window is it...???

[[...]]

 That refurbishment of Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat by 4th May 2011, has got me really concerned....

I have said I don't know how many times , that there are no Photographs of The Forensic Officers, taking any items from the bottom flat, which we know as number 2...

I always thought it weird that the media were not there watching as they removed items from this flat....

We only see Forensic Officers working in the Main House... Bringing any amount of "Forensic material out of the building....( Of Course not forgetting... what we know as Flat 1)

I wondered why the pavement next to what is supposed to be Dr Vincent Tabaks flat had been removed an replaced...



Then we have The Green tarpaulin surrounding the back of the building... I never understood why that was put there at all....  People from around the back could clearly see what was happening up until the 20th January when this tarpaulin was placed around the building by D.R.A Maintainence, whom I jokingly call 'Bob The Builder"...

Is the real reason for the Tarpaulin, to hide the fact that they are stripping the house out and refurbishing it???



This to me appears quite plausible... 

But you then have to put the question... How by the 20th January 2011 did they know that Dr Vincent Tabak was going to be arrested for the "Murder of Joanna Yeates???? Not only that but, Dr Vincent Tabak would be charged as such??? And he would not be applying for bail????

There has to be a reason for that tarpaulin... And I do not believe that it has anything to do with shielding the property because they are Forensically testing it....




Looking at all the replacement of the pavements makes sense to me now... If.... They were refurbishing that Flat as they say in the "For Rent" advert that was dated 4th May 2011...

They had installed a fully refurbished bathroom...
Well... If they needed to access the drains as they appear to have done in the images you can see, did they actually turn the ground floor into 2 flats at this time ??

Did Joanna Yeates live in the whole of the Ground Floor????  It may seem far fetched to some... But with The "Forensics" testing The Bay Window on the 24th December 2010 and the media saying it was Joanna Yeates  and Greg Reardons Flat...  I can only come to the conclusion that it was .....

I keep coming back to Justice Field I think who said... 'The Whole truth may Never be known"....

Well... Am I getting closer ?????

The next question is why????

Why have they gone to such great lengths to put Dr Vincent Tabak away????

Does nobody have any concerns as to 'The Refurbishment of This Flat by the 4th May 2011...long before Dr Vincent Tabak's Trial commenced in October 2011????

The jury visit Dr Vincent Tabak's flat and Joanna Yeates Flat at the trial....

But what was really shown to the Jury??? because I do not believe the time capsule rubbish anymore....

What time capsule?? There are NO Images... I repeat... NO Images of what Joanna Yeates flat looked like before they went in there and took everything out....

Don't you think that odd????

And the fact that in Joanna Yeates bedroom..  The different sets of furniture?? And in the front room... The fridge is in it.... Had The fridge been taken from the other part of the ground floor???

Image 4 shows the fridge ....

The video tour....

http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/656490716

The way the flat was layed out, seemed squashed... too much furniture  to me... But if they had more space than we have been lead to believe, then the massive couches could have been in the room with The Bay Window..... (IMO)..

Are we not a least bit curious as to why all this smoke and mirrors has taken place ????

These things should make people think.... These things should make people question Dr Vincent Tabak's supposed "Guilt To Manslaughter Plea"... Is he really guilty??

Because if they have gone to this great length to hide the possibility that Joanna Yeates and Greg lived in the whole of the Ground floor.... Then what lengths did they go to to put Dr Vincent Tabak away????

You have to go back to that Bay Window and The refurbishment of what is supposed to be Flat2 ...

And seriously question what has gone on in this case..... (IMO) !!!


Edit.....  If Dr Vincent Tabak really lived in The main House as I believe it is quite possible.... Why, would he removed the body of Joanna Yeates from her flat??? Why would he risk carrying her to his ???

He would need to carry her through the communal front door... where he could be seen by anyone entering or exiting the building!!

Double edit.... Notice the dream catcher thingy in the Bay Window at the back of the building.... There are similar items in Flat 1's bedroom .... So Again... Did Joanna yeates rent The whole of the Ground Floor at 44,Canygne Road ????


N:B... Please don't just comment on The Dream Catcher... I prefer if people look at what I have written about the whole of the ground floor and make their comments based on that information....


[attachment deleted by admin]

[[...]]

CJ's second witness statement.....

What did CJ see...???

Did he see Dr Vincent Tabak leaving The Communal Front Door going to ASDA....????

[[...]]

We have the same with The Pavement outside what we know as Flat 1...

I never understood why these pavements were lifted.... But Now I think i do......

http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/656486708

[attachment deleted by admin]