Something or someone appears to have distorted your thinking Nine? You seem to have been brainwashed into holding onto to your beliefs of this case?
How did you get involved in this case in the first place? What sparked your interest?
Self deception
"Self-deception is a process of denying or rationalizing away the relevance, significance, or importance of opposing evidence and logical argument. Self-deception involves convincing oneself of a truth so that one does not reveal any self-knowledge of the deception
"The folly of fools-The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life " https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L5EcIvVuAxg
Therefore, using techniques on Dr Vincent Tabak, you may get him to believe and admit he has committed said act , when in actual fact he didn't.... The fact that he didn't have enough knowledge of said crime and was unable to answer 80 questions, could be interpreted in two ways....
(A): He was being deceptive
(B): He had no knowledge because he didn't do it..
Whether or not you think I am brain washed, is neither here nor there.... I still believe that Dr Vincent Tabak is Innocent...
But since I started on here, nothing knew has come along to make me believe he is Guilty...
Nothing new in the media.... Nothing new at all.... Whether or not my beliefs differ from yours, is here nor there... i won't change your mind and you won't change mine... And not because i am being stubborn, because i would like to see evidence supporting Dr Vincent Tabak's claims he made on the stand.....
Saying he went to Asda, isn't proof he went to Asda... There a man walking around Asda that may resemble Dr Vincent Tabak... It may not be him..... Just because someone has told me it is him doesn't make it so.... Telling me that a blurred image of a car coming down Park Street is Dr Vincent Tabak's car doesn't make it so.... I see NO number plate, I cannot see who is driving... It could be anybody and any car.... And the time the footage comes from could also differ... It could be from Midnight on the 18th December 2010, up until 11:59pm on the 18th December 2010, so, who's car, what person is driving it and what time... Is extremely important.. You have a full 24 hours in which to establish someones where abouts, and there whereabouts are important, because if they are not on Park Street at 12:00am say... Then it cannot be them or their car, if they are drinking with friends for instance...
The footage could be at 5:00pm on the 18th December 2010... blowing the prosecutions idea, that Dr Vincent Tabak is driving around with Joanna Yeates in the car.... So we need to establish the facts and not just take the say so of someone....
So you believe I am brainwashed... Or am I thinking independently... There will always be influences upon someones perception of any idea, to not have such influences is an impossibility...
Or is the brainwashing the game of good cop bad cop..... Whilst I have been on here, i have questioned my own sanity, I have questioned my own self, I have cried plenty, I have got to the point at to whether i know if i am on my arse or elbow....
But nothing has changed.... Nothing has changed whatsoever.... I may have looked at some aspects in a different light, but my core belief that Dr Vincent Tabak is Innocent still stands.....
I have felt like an experiment sometimes, On the one hand, sometimes people seem supportive, then the next they have cut me down to the quick without explanation....
But is it our human nature that makes us respond that way, when we feel that we need to be accepted somehow... and other peoples opinions count in support of our own ideas....
The world won't stop spinning because a small person as myself, have a belief that most do not.... Those who believe what has been said at a trial, have that option to believe that too... The FULL FACTS do not appear to have been presented.... The story in itself maybe true.... Just the wrong person saying it....
I have not seen an autopsy report, so I have reports that skim on the evidence of what this report actually tells us of Joanna Yeates... For all I know she may have been pregnant.... She may have already had had a child,.. I am not stating this as fact, but saying nothing about Joanna Yeates has been fully explained... telling me she has bruises, doesn't tell me how she sustained said bruises, and by what mechanism, not telling me whether or not she had DNA under her finger nails, doesn't tell me whether she fought back...
Where there a pattern to these bruises that indict she was either grabbed or deflected a weapon,... I don't know that information... She could have been rendered unconcious as far as anyone knows... Because for all intense and purposes, she hasn't fought back.... WHY?
If it was a stranger, she most certainly would have fought back (imo)... And if it was someone known to her once she realised her life was in danger, she would have fought back too...
The sexual assault, or sexually motivated crime... This idea was planted in our heads long ago.... By denying that it was sexually motivated, people would have made there own mind up, trying to find a reason for an attack by someone not known to her... And by the time we are at trial, the mire suggestion that it was sexually motivated, tells our own minds, that she must have been assaulted, especially, if she is wearing different clothes..Especially, if she was posed, especially, if they talk of re-dressing.. And especially if we did not see images of her... her clothes could have been inside out for all I know... I do not know what the jury saw.... But the motive as I have stated, was subliminally planted back in December 2010..
Where was the evidence to support that Joanna Yeates had been sexually assaulted.... She very well may have been, but the autopsy report we haven't seen would tell us that... If someone omits something on a stand, doesn't mean it didn't happen... Or it wasn't a possibility....
As with whether or not I feel brainwashed, that depends on whether or not i interpret what has been said to me as brainwashing and whether or not my mind gets changed.... If Dr Vincent Tabak was brainwashed, that is more of a possibility.. Because that would depend on who is telling him what... And the fact that he is in isolation, having nothing familiar, to bounce back opinions from, makes him more susceptible, into believing what has been said...
He maybe sleep deprived, he may have been questioned for ever we don't know... But I can walk away from my computer... I can freely move about.... But Dr Vincent Tabak did not have that luxury... So was he brainwashed into believing he had committed this act?? or brainwashed into believing that he would be incarcerated for this act and evidence supports that it is him therefore admitting to Manslaughter, would be the safer option....
I cannot tell you who killed her... I can suggest people based on the information I know, but there are to many variables to that for me to be 100% sure.... If I base it on interviews of people I have seen that shortens the percentage... But If the real perp has not been identified in any manner in the media, then I have nothing to go on...
I don't know what else to say other than I still believe that Dr Vincent Tabak is Innocent, and does it really matter, to those who don't believe this, that I believe this?? It shouldn't... As I have said many times... I am nobody, I have no influence on any outcome of this case.. I am just a person, who has always believed that Dr Vincent Tabak is Innocent... And will forever believe this until i have been proved incorrect in my beliefs with concrete evidence...