Author Topic: The Defence Will State Their Case  (Read 600235 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2535 on: October 18, 2018, 11:21:50 AM »
What do Internet searches say the differences are of a not guilty and guilty plea to manslaughter?

What did a search say on this Nine?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2536 on: October 18, 2018, 11:49:10 AM »
Maybe in time my efforts may be appreciated, but today I feel at a loss...


So the question has to be.... why is anyone so bothered what i write, if my posts come from my strange way of doing things....

Why do you feel in time your efforts may be appreciated? And to what efforts do you refer?

You appear to be ignoring facts which have been pointed out to you numerous times?

VT pleaded guilty to manslaughter therefore there wasn't an option of Not guilty.

He admitted his guilt to killing JY.

Why are you refusing to take this fact on board?

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2537 on: October 18, 2018, 11:52:26 AM »
So what was the point of the trial....

A trial I was under the stupid impression that the defendant had the PRESUMPTION of INNOCENCE at the start of a trial....

Not GUILTY before being proven even GUILTIER!!!

My mistake....   

But I don't believe Dr Vincent Tabaks statement on the stand ,I do not believe he is guilty.... To make up my mind on said subject... Would require clear evidence supporting a claim or a plea.....
Thank you

Why when he had pleaded guilty to manslaughter? He told the court he wasn't innocent to the crime. Therfore innocence wasn't an option.

I suspect the reason you don't believe him to be guilty is because it means you will see it as "all your efforts" have been "wasted" therefore the easiest option for you is denial?

You have been cherry picking evidence to suit your theory and when you ask a question on the board and are given the answer you choose to ignore it and instead ask the same question over and over.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2018, 09:14:17 PM by John »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2538 on: October 18, 2018, 01:26:45 PM »

Tabak  was not forthcoming with the police when he told them about the car moving, he literally told them the car had moved, not that he helped move it, massive difference

It is a massive difference I agree... Could you tell me how you know that he only said the car had moved, and nothing else???


Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2540 on: October 18, 2018, 01:32:13 PM »
It is a massive difference I agree... Could you tell me how you know that he only said the car had moved, and nothing else???

Why are you doing this to yourself Nine?

Why are you digging yourself deeper into denial?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2541 on: October 18, 2018, 01:35:03 PM »
It is a massive difference I agree... Could you tell me how you know that he only said the car had moved, and nothing else???

He pleaded guilty to JY 's murder!

Sadly you probably won't get all the answers you seek.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2542 on: October 18, 2018, 01:45:59 PM »
My mistake, It appears that The law Pages haven't removed said page...  have relocated it

https://www.thelawpages.com/court-cases/Vincent-Tabak-7570-1.law

Having read that link for the first time, it fully explains how they came to the conclusion the murder was sexually motivated.

It all must have been on his mind quite a lot of the time if he even had to use his work computer to access it. Quite brazen too

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2543 on: October 18, 2018, 01:48:07 PM »
He pleaded guilty to JY 's murder!

Sadly you probably won't get all the answers you seek.

Thats been obvious from the start...

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2544 on: October 18, 2018, 01:49:12 PM »
Having read that link for the first time, it fully explains how they came to the conclusion the murder was sexually motivated.

It all must have been on his mind quite a lot of the time if he even had to use his work computer to access it. Quite brazen too

How exactly... Because a judge decided that the evidence that wasn't presented at trial, proved it was a sexually motivated assault??

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2545 on: October 18, 2018, 01:54:51 PM »
From your posts you seem to have failed to grasp the concept of him pleading guilty and how a trial would work from that. You have posted many examples that you dont understand it!

Right he has looked at porn and included in that is holding a womans neck and being tied up in the boot of a car

She had her neck held, she died and was put in the boot of the car, with blood to prove it

What the sexual element to those scenarios was, we cannot debate because we havent seen the porn he was so keen to look at both at home and work. He was classed as dangerous, which is fully understandable

How do you know how much attention he gave Jo up to that night?
« Last Edit: October 20, 2018, 09:16:57 PM by John »

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2546 on: October 18, 2018, 02:14:43 PM »
How exactly... Because a judge decided that the evidence that wasn't presented at trial, proved it was a sexually motivated assault??

The answer to your question is in the link YOU posted

Offline Nicholas

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2548 on: October 18, 2018, 02:22:10 PM »
Thats been obvious from the start...

Your numerous Freudian slips suggest subconsciously you know Tabak is guilty IMO. 
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2549 on: October 18, 2018, 02:23:19 PM »
 8@??)(