Have you any conception of how mind bogglingly boring this 2007 fixation your posts portray; how on earth have you failed to notice that the world has moved on to concerns of 2021 and the probable break through of Madeleine's case with a really viable suspect in the frame.
Maybe the babes in the wood case might educate you further that it doesn't matter how cold the case is
It can go back to the original suspect 32 years later. was guilty of the crime
https://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/article/babes-in-the-woods-and-the-cold-cases-solved-decades-laterI'm surprised your posts are naive enough to think just because the years roll on the original suspect should be ruled out because of lack of evidence.
Seems to me as long as it does not involve the mccs you accept anything anyone puts on the table...even though there is nothing credable to back it up.
Your viable suspect in the frame.... is nothing more than a person of interest [how many has there been now lost count].
As for mind boggling boring posts you should look at your own...I rarely read them unless they are directed at me.
Sorry about that but imo if a senior mod can drop there decorum B..... so can I