Author Topic: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?  (Read 2516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #105 on: May 06, 2021, 10:59:04 AM »
Sue Hill had this to say back in 2017.

Sue Hill, a former Metropolitan Police Senior Detective, told hosts that because of a lack of resources, long-standing investigations such as the search for Madeleine need to be called off

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3075702/good-morning-britain-that-hunt-for-missing-madeleine-mccann-is-a-waste-of-taxpayers-money-karen-danczuk/

Changed her tune then, has she?

Offline barrier

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #106 on: May 06, 2021, 11:03:08 AM »
Changed her tune then, has she?


Nah, its all noise for the sake of it, she was a former MPSD in 2017 and still is today, join the dots, 2017, 10th year since the disappearance, this year the girls would be 18th birthday.

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline G-Unit

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #107 on: May 15, 2021, 09:53:18 AM »
According to an ex Met Chief Inspector Wolters has nothing concrete, he only has reasonable suspicion based on CB's past and circumstantial evidence.

"Ex-chief inspector Mick Neville, who founded the Met Police’s Central Forensic Image Team in 2012, believes officers are just hoping for a confession from Brueckner.

He told the Daily Star: “If there’s any [evidence] worthy of charging him, we would have known about it by now.

“There’s nothing, there’s no tangible evidence whatsoever connecting him to the crime."
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/madeleine-mccann-detectives-only-hope-24090479
No-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance because belief without evidence is useless.

Offline Davel

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #108 on: May 15, 2021, 09:58:14 AM »
According to an ex Met Chief Inspector Wolters has nothing concrete, he only has reasonable suspicion based on CB's past and circumstantial evidence.

"Ex-chief inspector Mick Neville, who founded the Met Police’s Central Forensic Image Team in 2012, believes officers are just hoping for a confession from Brueckner.

He told the Daily Star: “If there’s any [evidence] worthy of charging him, we would have known about it by now.

“There’s nothing, there’s no tangible evidence whatsoever connecting him to the crime."
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/madeleine-mccann-detectives-only-hope-24090479

Its in the Star so may not be true... I doubt like us hrs followed Wolters statements closely.. If he has... Hes an idiot. Simon Foy... Ex SY.. Doesnt agree with him

Offline barrier

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #109 on: May 15, 2021, 09:59:11 AM »
According to an ex Met Chief Inspector Wolters has nothing concrete, he only has reasonable suspicion based on CB's past and circumstantial evidence.

"Ex-chief inspector Mick Neville, who founded the Met Police’s Central Forensic Image Team in 2012, believes officers are just hoping for a confession from Brueckner.

He told the Daily Star: “If there’s any [evidence] worthy of charging him, we would have known about it by now.

“There’s nothing, there’s no tangible evidence whatsoever connecting him to the crime."
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/madeleine-mccann-detectives-only-hope-24090479

IMO Ferrari should have asked Dick did she expect the BKA to arrest and question CB over Madeleine's murder, he fudged it.

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline barrier

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #110 on: May 15, 2021, 10:00:13 AM »
Its in the Star so may not be true... I doubt like us hrs followed Wolters statements closely.. If he has... Hes an idiot. Simon Foy... Ex SY.. Doesnt agree with him

Anyone who doesn't follow Wolters is an idiot according to you.

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline G-Unit

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #111 on: May 15, 2021, 10:29:02 AM »
Its in the Star so may not be true... I doubt like us hrs followed Wolters statements closely.. If he has... Hes an idiot. Simon Foy... Ex SY.. Doesnt agree with him

There are quite a few ex Met people pontificating about the case. Obviously those that people agree with are 'clever' and those they disagree with are 'idiots'.

It would be interesting to know what Wolters actually said in his own language about his evidence, as Neville suggests it was mistranslated.
No-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance because belief without evidence is useless.

Offline Davel

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #112 on: May 15, 2021, 11:08:00 AM »
There are quite a few ex Met people pontificating about the case. Obviously those that people agree with are 'clever' and those they disagree with are 'idiots'.

It would be interesting to know what Wolters actually said in his own language about his evidence, as Neville suggests it was mistranslated.

He has spoken in English and German...reported in German.
If you read my post properly you will see I haven't called Neville an idiot. If you want to be sure what he said read a German newspaper.
Funny how you are suddenly concerned with mistranslations.
I'm suggesting the star has misreported or Neville is not familiar with all wolters statements

Offline Davel

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #113 on: May 15, 2021, 11:44:29 AM »
How can Neville possibly say there is no tangible evidence connecting CB to MM... What does he know that we dont

Offline Brietta

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #114 on: May 15, 2021, 11:50:49 AM »
He has spoken in English and German...reported in German.
If you read my post properly you will see I haven't called Neville an idiot. If you want to be sure what he said read a German newspaper.
Funny how you are suddenly concerned with mistranslations.
I'm suggesting the star has misreported or Neville is not familiar with all wolters statements

Main suspect in Madeleine McCann case
Three more trials await the alleged murderer Christian B.
May 15, 2021

"If a sufficient suspicion of wrongdoing is confirmed in several cases, it must be examined whether a joint indictment would be appropriate," says Christian Wolters, spokesman for the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office. Christian B.'s lawyer declined to comment on the investigation. The investigation is expected to continue for several months.

https://www.rtl.de/cms/auf-den-mutmasslichen-moerder-von-maddie-christian-b-warten-noch-drei-weitere-verfahren-4760330.html
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #115 on: May 15, 2021, 12:34:45 PM »
According to an ex Met Chief Inspector Wolters has nothing concrete, he only has reasonable suspicion based on CB's past and circumstantial evidence.

"Ex-chief inspector Mick Neville, who founded the Met Police’s Central Forensic Image Team in 2012, believes officers are just hoping for a confession from Brueckner.

He told the Daily Star: “If there’s any [evidence] worthy of charging him, we would have known about it by now.

“There’s nothing, there’s no tangible evidence whatsoever connecting him to the crime."
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/madeleine-mccann-detectives-only-hope-24090479
I wonder how much he got paid for that little story by the Daily Star then....  8(0(*
Mare's eat oat's and doe's eat oat's and little lamb's eat ivy.

Offline jassi

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #116 on: May 15, 2021, 06:02:40 PM »
I feel it is no coincidence that Wolters has spoken out about new evidence just as OG has got it's begging bowl out for more funding.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for this season.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #117 on: May 15, 2021, 06:28:48 PM »
I feel it is no coincidence that Wolters has spoken out about new evidence just as OG has got it's begging bowl out for more funding.
What a very strange observation.
Mare's eat oat's and doe's eat oat's and little lamb's eat ivy.

Offline barrier

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #118 on: May 15, 2021, 06:43:05 PM »
What a very strange observation.


Think so, can the BKA go it alone ?

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #119 on: May 15, 2021, 06:44:04 PM »

Think so, can the BKA go it alone ?
I don’t know what you are talking about.
Mare's eat oat's and doe's eat oat's and little lamb's eat ivy.