If Brueckner is Never Charged.

[Angelo222]

Well if they wanted the slava sample how do you know they are not interested in what the dogs found.

It is possible in my opinion this is why they think Maddie is dead.

Everything they seem to be working on is here say as said many times nothing concrete or he would be charged.

Why do they think Maddie is dead no one has told them that its possible the reason for it is the same as GA. said

Unless Brueckner also told his pal he ran her over by accident.  Wouldn't that be a revelation for the case?

[kizzy]

Unless Brueckner also told his pal he ran her over by accident.  Wouldn't that be a revelation for the case?

IT certainly would.

Also, GA was on the right track in thinking Maddie died by accident.

[Mr Gray]

I don't need to find him innocent of MM's murder.  In the eyes of the law he already is.

He isn't innocent in the eyes of the law...he's entitled to the presumption of innocence...theres a difference

[Mr Gray]

Well if they wanted the slava sample how do you know they are not interested in what the dogs found.

It is possible in my opinion this is why they think Maddie is dead.

Everything they seem to be working on is here say as said many times nothing concrete or he would be charged.

Why do they think Maddie is dead no one has told them that its possible the reason for it is the same as GA. said

Stop dreaming...CWH said they have strong evidence Maddie is dead and their suspect killed her

[Holly Goodhead]

Stop dreaming...CWH said they have strong evidence Maddie is dead and their suspect killed her

CWH or HCW?

[kizzy]

Stop dreaming...CWH said they have strong evidence Maddie is dead and their suspect killed her

Well, he seems to think Maddie is Dead......maybe has got strong evidence she is....[still could be the dogs]

But at this moment in time, he is struggling to make CB the culprit.

 

[Holly Goodhead]

He isn't innocent in the eyes of the law...he's entitled to the presumption of innocence...theres a difference

No difference:

The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty. In many countries, the presumption of innocence is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, and it is an international human right under the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11.

[Holly Goodhead]

Davel at what point will you consider all of this is going nowhere?  Autumn, Christmas, when? 

[Mr Gray]

Well, he seems to think Maddie is Dead......maybe has got strong evidence she is....[still could be the dogs]

But at this moment in time, he is struggling to make CB the culprit.

the dogs are not strong evidence...when will you realise

[Mr Gray]

No difference:

The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty. In many countries, the presumption of innocence is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, and it is an international human right under the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11.

there is  a big difference...ask Barry George

[kizzy]

the dogs are not strong evidence...when will you realise

Neither is what the Germans have. when will you realize?

[Mr Gray]

Davel at what point will you consider all of this is going nowhere?  Autumn, Christmas, when?

Who says its going nowhere.....it may go nowhere ...I'm interested to see what this strong evidence is

[Mr Gray]

Neither is what the Germans have. when will you realize?

you have no idea what the Germans have

[kizzy]

you have no idea what the Germans have

Lol neither do you. you have to admit it could be nothing D

[Mr Gray]

Lol neither do you. you have to admit it could be nothing D

Neither is what the Germans have. when will you realize? was your post

so you admit now you dont know


I dont think the  germans would say what they have if they have nothing