If Brueckner is Never Charged.

[Mr Gray]

No for accusing him of doing the things he hasn’t.

Hes aconvicted paedophile...rapist...Hes a suspect in the McCann case. Wheres the libel?

[Wonderfulspam]

I thought he'd served his sentence for sex crimes against children some 20 odd years ago.

Doesn't that make him an ex paedophile?

[Venturi Swirl]

I thought he'd served his sentence for sex crimes against children some 20 odd years ago.

Doesn't that make him an ex paedophile?

So is it libel to say he’s a paedophile then?

[Snowgirl]

Its evidence of abduction....you need to understand what is meant by evidence. Evidence doesnt always prove something...but taken to gether with other evidence it can.

In this case there is no other evidence  to suspect an abduction took place and I do understand the meaning of the word  .

[Brietta]

No its not,where have the germans say their suspect abducted Madeleine from 5a.

In my opinion the German's are dancing to no-one's tune;  they are following the evidence whatever that may be and the evidence has led them to Bruekenr's door and unlike the PJ are hoping someone has the information which will open it.

Expecting a blow by blow account of their investigation as you appear to do is incredibly negative and naive.

[Mr Gray]

In this case there is no other evidence  to suspect an abduction took place and I do understand the meaning of the word  .

Maddie missing..open window...parents not suspects...woke and wandered highly unlikely according to the archiving report....that's some evidence.What do you think it suggests

[Brietta]

But will he know this?  The fear will always be there.

In my opinion he will be known to the people who matter and already he is segregated from some of them for his own protection.

I think he will be looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life.

[Venturi Swirl]

In this case there is no other evidence  to suspect an abduction took place and I do understand the meaning of the word  .

How do you explain the fact that three  police forces are now treating this case as one of abduction by a stranger?

[Brietta]

Sue?  What for?  He has No Reputation left to lose.

Who lied about him ... no-one I know of, so to suggest he might sue is just plain silly in my opinion.

[Brietta]

I would agree with you, but that's not how libel laws work. Additionally, as I've mentioned here in the past, Germany have the strictest privacy laws in the EU, maybe the world, which came in to being in 2018. He's going to hit the big time - he can pursue civil suits against any media outlet from a German base and wait for the cash to roll in.

Maybe the person who first enabled his privacy to be breached should be worried then?  You know ... the private citizen who hit the media with tales of a German prisoner in jail in Germany, but not the one doing life.  followed by a mocked up photograph of him with long hair and a picture of the vehicle he was allegedly driving.

T'would always be a starting point to test exactly how robust the privacy laws in Germany shape up.

[Anthro]

According to the PJ files many samples of dogs’ hair were found in apartment 5A. Since Brückner is known to have had several dogs over a long period of time, perhaps a DNA match could be found on some clothing belonging to him?

[Brietta]

  Somehow I thought you'd say that.
 One person said the window was open?Are you saying without corroboration that it's evidence of a fact ?

Read my post very carefully ... I said a witness statement is evidence.  It is not for you or anyone else on the internet to sit in judgement on what the witness has said.
All you or anyone else has to know and accept is that a witness statement is evidence.

[Eleanor]

Maybe the person who first enabled his privacy to be breached should be worried then?  You know ... the private citizen who hit the media with tales of a German prisoner in jail in Germany, but not the one doing life.  followed by a mocked up photograph of him with long hair and a picture of the vehicle he was allegedly driving.

T'would always be a starting point to test exactly how robust the privacy laws in Germany shape up.

Oh my goodness, you don't mean AmaraL

[jassi]

Read my post very carefully ... I said a witness statement is evidence.  It is not for you or anyone else on the internet to sit in judgement on what the witness has said.
All you or anyone else has to know and accept is that a witness statement is evidence.

Of course, evidence can be true or false.

[The General]

Maybe the person who first enabled his privacy to be breached should be worried then?  You know ... the private citizen who hit the media with tales of a German prisoner in jail in Germany, but not the one doing life.  followed by a mocked up photograph of him with long hair and a picture of the vehicle he was allegedly driving.

T'would always be a starting point to test exactly how robust the privacy laws in Germany shape up.

Still missing the point. Privacy is one aspect - but what I can tell you about privacy in Germany when it comes to criminality, is that they take the concept of rehabilitation seriously, and that is only fully possible with the adherence to strict privacy laws, sometimes extending to post conviction. It's a basic tenet of their legal system and one of the reasons why their recidivism rate is one of the lowest in the Western world.
So on the one hand you have this enshrined privacy, that's probably been breached innumerable times, and on the other you have the civil aspect of libel across perpetrated across just about any medium you can think of - it's more of a matter of which of the turkeys to shoot first.
Hey, maybe one his lawyers will pop over to have a look at this place.