If Brueckner is Never Charged.

[Wonderfulspam]

I was under the impression that all known paedophiles in the Luz area had been investigated.  Including Hewlett who made no secret of being in the area, which he knew very well, at the time.
I think he even boasted of seeing and being close to Madeleine on at least one occasion,

Apparently I was wrong if Hewlett and Brueckner are anything to go by and I wonder who else with a similar profile, might have been studiously ignored by the Judicial Police.

Yes, Hewlett claimed to have got so close to Maddie that he could see her eye defect.
So I think we can safely write his claims off as total BS.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191094/Paedophile-Raymond-Hewlett-admits-I-saw-Madeleine-McCann-twice-disappeared.html

[Carana]

He didn't have a door, so Amaral is probably mistaken imo.

According to what I've been able to glean from Sandra's report (thanks Myster), police did go to check on 10 May 2008 at Sitio dos Lages (not sure whether that's the location of the house near PdL with the yellow frames, or some camping site in the vicinity) and discovered that he had no belongings there and hadn't been seen there for 2 years.

[G-Unit]

According to what I've been able to glean from Sandra's report (thanks Myster), police did go to check on 10 May 2008 at Sitio dos Lages (not sure whether that's the location of the house near PdL with the yellow frames, or some camping site in the vicinity) and discovered that he had no belongings there and hadn't been seen there for 2 years.

It was two years earlier when he left the first house in Monte Judeu, wasn't it?

[Anthro]

I think it's unlikely after 13 years.

A single hair was enough to convict Brückner of the rape and abuse of the American tourist, Diana M in 2005 at Casa Jacaranda. According to the forensic report 257 hairs were found in 5A of which 12 were non-human. Why do you think it is unlikely after 13 years?

[Carana]

It was two years earlier when he left the first house in Monte Judeu, wasn't it?

That's what I'd thought as well, but I'm not sure now. News reports are confusing as to which they mean. Perhaps they're not sure, either. He seems to have been playing a cat and mouse game.

[Eleanor]

Surely, what was sauce for The Goose is sauce for The Gander.  Not that I think that anyone on this Forum could solve this.

But.

[Venturi Swirl]

He didn't have a door, so Amaral is probably mistaken imo.

or lying.

[G-Unit]

That's what I'd thought as well, but I'm not sure now. News reports are confusing as to which they mean. Perhaps they're not sure, either. He seems to have been playing a cat and mouse game.

Why did the police want to speak to him in May 2008?

[G-Unit]

A single hair was enough to convict Brückner of the rape and abuse of the American tourist, Diana M in 2005 at Casa Jacaranda. According to the forensic report 257 hairs were found in 5A of which 12 were non-human. Why do you think it is unlikely after 13 years?

They would need to find a dog hair somewhere to match one of those 12 (is that 'many'?). You may think that's possible after 13 years, I don't.

[Eleanor]

Why did the police want to speak to him in May 2008?

Because he was a Paedophile?

[G-Unit]

Because he was a Paedophile?

A word which is bandied about just like psychopath is, with little regard for it's precise meaning imo.

[Eleanor]

A word which is bandied about just like psychopath is, with little regard for it's precise meaning imo.

Oh Dear God.  Words fail me.  So what do you think Paedophile means?

[G-Unit]

Oh Dear God.  Words fail me.  So what do you think Paedophile means?

CB has convictions for child sexual abuse, but that doesn't mean he's a paedophile.

although some people who commit child sexual abuse are pedophiles, child sexual abuse offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

[Eleanor]

CB has convictions for child sexual abuse, but that doesn't mean he's a paedophile.

although some people who commit child sexual abuse are pedophiles, child sexual abuse offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

Ah, I see.  Any old Sexual Abuse will do so long as one doesn't put a name to it, even when one sexually abuses a six year old girl child.

What do you call Rape of a 72 year old woman?

[Venturi Swirl]

A word which is bandied about just like psychopath is, with little regard for it's precise meaning imo.

Unimportant as far as reasons why the police would want to speak to him in 2008, he had been convicted of sex crimes against children, so call it what you want but let’s not mince words - again!!