Wandering Off Topic

[jassi]

So that automatically makes it  true? - how naive

[Mr Gray]

So that automatically makes it  true? - how naive

What a sloppy comment.. Ive never said its true... You need to be more precise when reading information... Another reason which I think makes me a better judge of the report.
Gunit said theres no evidence its true... You obviously missed that... Shes wrong... Of course theres evidence its true

[Venturi Swirl]

According to a comment by BDO, a firm of chartered accountants. They didn't say where they got that information from, and it doesn't seem to appear anywhere else.

They do say that they had direct contact with Martin Grime when compiling their report, so...

[Venturi Swirl]

According to a comment by BDO, a firm of chartered accountants. They didn't say where they got that information from, and it doesn't seem to appear anywhere else.

Can you give me one good reason why they would have included this detail if it were untrue?

[G-Unit]

Can you give me one good reason why they would have included this detail if it were untrue?

You tell me. As they don't say where they got the info there's no way to check if it's true or not.

[Venturi Swirl]

You tell me. As they don't say where they got the info there's no way to check if it's true or not.

No, you’re the one suggesting it shouldn’t be believed so you tell me.

[Mr Gray]

You tell me. As they don't say where they got the info there's no way to check if it's true or not.

The fact thst it is stated in an official document is evidencer it is true... Can you supply any evidence it isnt true

[Robittybob1]

The anthropologist identifief it as a skull.

The coconut was removed to a different location where the dog alerted specifically to the coconut

So if that happened what does that suggest?

[Venturi Swirl]

So if that happened what does that suggest?

It suggests don’t believe everything a dog tells you, sometimes they make stuff up just for a laugh but then who doesn’t do that?

[Mr Gray]

So if that happened what does that suggest?

It would suggest that we can add coconuts to the list of things eddie would alert to. I would be intetested to know what Grimes explanation would be

[G-Unit]

It would suggest that we can add coconuts to thr list of things eddie would alert to. I would be intetested to know what Grimes expplanation would be

It's a logical fallacy to assume that Eddie would alert to the scent of coconut, just as it would be to assume he would alert to the scent of clothing (Mccann case) or shovels and spirit levels (Amanda Edwards case).

[Mr Gray]

It's a logical fallacy to assume that Eddie would alert to the scent of coconut, just as it would be to assume he would alert to the scent of clothing (Mccann case) or shovels and spirit levels (Amanda Edwards case).

Its not a logical fallacy at all... In fact it seems to have happened

[G-Unit]

Its not a logical fallacy at all... In fact it seems to have happened

It also happened that Eddie alerted to clothing and a shovel.

[Venturi Swirl]

Is now a good time to bring up the sex tissue again?

[G-Unit]

Is now a good time to bring up the sex tissue again?

To which both dogs alerted? That suggests that blood was present.

"EVRD – positive indication.

SOCO visual – positive.

Blood dog - positive indication.

Visual – positive

UV – negative (items removed prior to screening).

Quasar - negative

Positive indications confirmed as being recently deposited tissues used to clean up after sex by unknown persons."
IDENTIFIED DEFENSIVE POSITIONS http://voiceforprotest.blogspot.com/2010/03/operation-rectangle-summary-report.html