New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

So let's return to the subject; Wolter's admission that it may take years of investigation before Bruekner can be charged in connection with Madeleine McCann's disappearance. How anyone can describe that as 'looking good' escapes me. In my opinion it looks like an admission of failure after five years of invesigation and a huge media campaign.

CMOMM who you admire have spent 15 yrs getting it wrong..that's a mega fail

[G-Unit]

No, an admission of failure would be “we’ve exhausted all leads and opportunities to secure a conviction against CB and are therefore winding up the investigation “.

It's not looking good, though, is it?

[G-Unit]

CMOMM who you admire have spent 15 yrs getting it wrong..that's a mega fail

I have no intention of being deflected. This thread is about the no longer new German suspect, not about CMOMM.

[Mr Gray]

It's not looking good, though, is it?

It's not looking good for sceptics such as yourself....How is solving this mystery a failure...

[Mr Gray]

I have no intention of being deflected. This thread is about the no longer new German suspect, not about CMOMM.

You simply have no answer...for years the McCann's have been trolled by sceptics...wolters is proving then all wrong

[Venturi Swirl]

It's not looking good, though, is it?

I’m entirely relaxed about it.  How’s your investigation into the McCanns going, it’s been a while now…?

[G-Unit]

The investigation is ongoing....Wolters is confident he has the murderer of MM.....if you see that as failure you need glasses

Success requires a charge and conviction. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor thinks.

[Mr Gray]

Success requires a charge and conviction. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor thinks.

You have decided that won't happen and accused Wolters of failing....that's an assumption.
If Wolters has the evidence he claims...that's very important...I don't see him as being a liar

[G-Unit]

It's not looking good for sceptics such as yourself....How is solving this mystery a failure...

A mystery isn't solved by making unsupported accusations, but by proving those accusations are correct and achieving a conviction in a criminal court.

[Venturi Swirl]

A mystery isn't solved by making unsupported accusations, but by proving those accusations are correct and achieving a conviction in a criminal court.

And sometimes it takes many years to get to that point, or do you think all investigations last a maximum of 1 or 3 or 5 years?

[Mr Gray]

A mystery isn't solved by making unsupported accusations, but by proving those accusations are correct and achieving a conviction in a criminal court.

If Wolters has the evidence he claims the mystery is solved..

You seem to have a lot of faith in courts

[Venturi Swirl]

Success requires a charge and conviction. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor thinks.

Basically you and other sceptics are using the fact that this case has not yet come to court to goad McCann supporters.  Don’t you think that’s a little childish?

[G-Unit]

You have decided that won't happen and accused Wolters of failing....that's an assumption.
If Wolters has the evidence he claims...that's very important...I don't see him as being a liar

Wolter's evidence may have convinced him, but if it's not enough to charge and convict his suspect it won't convince anyone else.

[Mr Gray]

A mystery isn't solved by making unsupported accusations, but by proving those accusations are correct and achieving a conviction in a criminal court.

You are making the assumption that the accusations are unsupported...

[G-Unit]

If Wolters has the evidence he claims the mystery is solved..

You seem to have a lot of faith in courts

No-one can be declared guilty except by a court.