New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

Wolter's evidence may have convinced him, but if it's not enough to charge and convict his suspect it won't convince anyone else.

All assumptions....Wolters may well have enough to charge and convict...but hevwants to be sure.

The evidence he has may well  convince many

[Mr Gray]

No-one can be declared guilty except by a court.

A guilty verdict is an opinion....doesn't mrn the accused is actually iinnocent or guilty.
You said his evidence won't convince anyone else..your opinion...and clearly totally wrong.

I've never heard you condemn those who have declared the McCanns guilty

[barrier]

All assumptions....Wolters may well have enough to charge and convict...but hevwants to be sure.

The evidence he has may well  convince many

Its the few he has to convince, court of public opinion has no place in the justice system which its seems Wolters is at home in.

[Wonderfulspam]

Basically you and other sceptics are using the fact that this case has not yet come to court to goad McCann supporters.  Don’t you think that’s a little childish?

You feel goaded by the current absence of charges against Brueckner?
Oh well, shouldn't be much longer now aye.

[Wonderfulspam]

You have decided that won't happen and accused Wolters of failing....that's an assumption.
If Wolters has the evidence he claims...that's very important...I don't see him as being a liar

Perhaps you're just gullible & fell into a trap set for Brueckner.

[Wonderfulspam]

Its the few he has to convince, court of public opinion has no place in the justice system which its seems Wolters is at home in.

He only needs to convince one judge.
He's confident he can do that, just not anytime in the foreseeable future though.

[Mr Gray]

Perhaps you're just gullible & fell into a trap set for Brueckner.

More likely you and all the other sceptics arr gullible and don't understand how to assess evidence...that's my view

[Wonderfulspam]

More likely you and all the other sceptics arr gullible and don't understand how to assess evidence...that's my view

Right, well teach us then.
What irrefutable evidence of abduction are we missing exactly?

[G-Unit]

All assumptions....Wolters may well have enough to charge and convict...but hevwants to be sure.

The evidence he has may well  convince many

You'll never know what it is if he can't scrape enough together to charge hs suspect.

[Venturi Swirl]

You'll never know what it is if he can't scrape enough together to charge hs suspect.

How about just waiting to see how it all pans out and quit second guessing the outcome?   A crazy idea I know....

[Wonderfulspam]

How about just waiting to see how it all pans out and quit second guessing the outcome?   A crazy idea I know....

We'll be waiting a while, indeed, for the foreseeable future according to Wolters.

[G-Unit]

How about just waiting to see how it all pans out and quit second guessing the outcome?   A crazy idea I know....

It's supporters who got carried away, not sceptics imo.

[Venturi Swirl]

It's supporters who got carried away, not sceptics imo.

So you don't think sceptics spend all day every day writing things like "has Wolters solved the case yet - won't be long now"?  In what way would you say I have been "carried away"?

[Wonderfulspam]

So you don't think sceptics spend all day every day writing things like "has Wolters solved the case yet - won't be long now"?  In what way would you say I have been "carried away"?

Just for clarity here.
Are you convinced Brueckner abducted & murdered Maddie, or not?
I mean, if not, then 'shouldn't be much longer now' shouldn't affect you in the slightest really.

[Mr Gray]

You'll never know what it is if he can't scrape enough together to charge hs suspect.

more assumption from you