If Dr Vincent Tabak is indeed guilty of the Charges that have been laid against him... And a show trail..
Prove it... Prove it with hard Evidence and Facts..
Show me Evidence that SHOWS intent...
Show me Evidence that he even came into contact with Joanna Yeates..
The Partial DNA only rules a suspect out... to match it the would need a relative..
When a crime-scene DNA sample matches a profile in the database at most, but not all loci, the individual from the database is excluded. However, it is very likely that a close relative is the source of that DNA rather than a random, unrelated individual. These partial matches can be used by investigators to find the individual who left the DNA at the crime scene
David Bruce Bowen - in 1979 eight year-old Kenneth Conrick was tortured and murdered; the case went unsolved for 30 years. Investigators recently obtained a DNA sample from Bowen’s sister, which showed enough similarities to DNA found on the victim and his clothing at the crime scene to allow investigators to obtain a warrant for Bowen's DNA. Bowen’s DNA profile matched the profile from semen on cords used to strangle the boy. Bowen pled guilty and admitted that he strangled and stabbed the victim after molesting him.
The sample was PARTIAL... not a full DNA profile......
Show me that they approach a relative for a sample of DNA..
That's all I require... Facts!!( And other people who have expressed concern over Dr Vincent Tabaks conviction)
Did Dr Vincent Tabaks family member provide a DNA sample that could either rule him as the supplier of that DNA sample or Rule him out......
Show me that he INTENDED to murder somebody.... Anybody!!
Show me and all the other people who have doubts about Dr Vincent Tabak's conviction that he was indeed THEIR MAN...
And again I'm editing my post,...
Because when you supply the Hard evidence that prove Dr Vincent Tabak commited this Crime...maybe people like me and other who have questioned how Dr Vincent Tabak was treated ... will stop asking about this CONVICTION....