Miss Taken Identity: on page 26 of this thread, I have included a document giving information about all the fire and rescue equipment used to recover Joanna's body (which the jury and the public were told was found by dog walkers).
Documents speak for themselves, but can you explain why so much equipment was needed? A boat???? A crane???? All those pumping tenders???? Do you know anyone who works for the fire and rescue service who could explain this?
The document was obtained through a FOI request: it was not revealed to the public (or the jury) , apart from a very brief mention on ITN news and in the Daily Mail, and in the local Bristol papers. Very few people have questioned it, although it casts doubt on where Jo's body was actually found.
You may ask why that matters, and somebody pointed out that it makes no difference to who murdered her. If there is a valid reason why all that equipment was needed, fair enough. If there isn't, it casts doubt on the story we have been told, and , depending on where the body was actually found, it could well suggest that more than one person dumped it.
If we have not been given the true facts about where the body was found, what else haven't we been given the truth about? The dog walkers, remember, did not actually appear in court and give their evidence under oath: their evidence was read out from a written statement.
The link below is for the post mrswah made with the pdf of the fire brigade appliances that attended, not just on Christmas Day, but on several days later..???
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7613.msg366721#msg366721Some of the fire brigade services where there as late as 9:45pm Why???????
The Avon Fire Service helped police remove the body, which was clothed and covered in snow, from the scene in order to preserve the site for a thorough forensic examination.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/joanna-yeates-police-satisfied-body-271510Ah.... it was the site they were protecting??? Shouldn't it have been the Joanna Yeates first????
Surely.. it's the Police that protect the scene of crime .. not the fire brigade..
Jo was removed at 4:45pm and was taken away in an ambulance , before Dr Delaney has examined her at 6:00pm
Check my previous post:
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7613.msg367730#msg367730But The official version is that they used a broom handle...
Broom handles were used.... but that was to search the verges not remove Joanna Yeates...
They must have needed the appliances to reach where she was.....
The body was thawing out... I refer to my post below:
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7613.msg367513;topicseen#msg367513It highly unlikely that a body had lain in Longwood Road since 17th Dec 2010... It was an area frequented by many dog walkers, and I read about a woman who saw a white van as she came out from the opposite side of the road near the entrance.. (can't find the article)... Could also have seen it, if it was there...
The picture I have attached with two people speaking the the police officer, is quite odd... Who are they??
They can't be witness,s as they would keep anyone away from the crime scene....
The police, have avoided explaining the fire brigade appliance, and as with the forensic tent, to cover Joanna's body to protect the scene, they also deny using the forensic tent in court for the protection of Joanna Yeates...
So... if the forensic tent wasn't for the protection of Joanna Yeates... what was it covering up...
It must have been an important piece of evidence , if they used the tent to protect it...
But.... nothing was brought to trial regards what they were protecting under THAT Tent....
The tent would be used to protect the body from further injury, whilst being removed and the pathologist has had a chance to examine, when it is in situ....
There were 43 injuries , who knows which injuries where made whilst recovering the body from a possible place that wasn't easy to access...
Straps and harnesses were used as part of the equipment the fire brigade lists in the pdf..
The fire brigade where there before the Dr....
The body was also transported in an ambulance before the Dr. examined it....
How is that protecting the scene????
I was under the impression, that you secure the scene and that the Dr examines the body before it is removed.. Then the foresnsic team come in wearing white coveralls as to not contaminate any possible evidence there...
Police are just wandering about I don't think i've seen anyone in coveralls.. The amount of fire service personal at the scene will only add to contamination...
Plus the two strangers who are allowed just to hang about: picture 4
So anyone got an answer for this as mrswah has asked????
I think a thourgh examination of the PDF needs doing.... 8 apppliances uded
They attended the scene on no less than 4 occasions:
The 25th Dec 2010 with 27 crew members attending in total?? ( adds to contamination of scene)
The 27th Dec 2010 with 4 crew members attending
The 28th Dec 2010 with 4 crew members attending
The 29th Dec 2010 with 2 crew members attending
Why would the fire service need to attend the scene of a murder enquiry 4 different days???
what were they recovering?? cleaning up??
Why would they need them there on so many ocassions... And why was this not mentioned in court!!!
.
What's the big folder the guy in high viz holding and why would he need it at a crime scene??????
Picture 3
EDIT: 7:50pm I think why I have a problem with the forensic, tent... Is....... I believe there's Two forensic Tents..... One to the left in the entrance of the quarry, and one slightly further up the road...
[attachment deleted by admin]