Again referring to Leonora's pdf:....
On Boxing Day, Avon and Somerset
police requested a scene-going
scientist, Tania Nickson, from a
forensic company to attend the place
where Jo’s body had been dumped.
Boxing Day??????
While forensic scientists do not attend
crime scenes as a matter of course, in
this instance the police had very little
to go on.
How would they know they would have very little to go on... before they examined her?????????
“It was a difficult scene. It was
very cold and there was a lot of snow
on the ground,” says Lindsay Lennen,
who is a case leader for homicides.
“The first issue was whether or not
to disturb the snow.
So she was there when she was found.... Case Leader????? Thought it was Andrew Mott and his unweildly broom handle!!!
There were
discussions on whether to remove
the snow which could interfere with any evidence or examine it in situ. In
the end, the snow was removed and
blood was recovered from the wall
behind the body.”
So they removed the snow and collected the blood.... Now good old Tania Nickson collected the blood from the wall... And apparently she was there on "BOXING DAY"!!!!
This statement is off... Sounds like they removed the snow and them collected the blood??? Which is Boxing Day!!
If her body was hiding the blood on the wall , how low down was this blood??/ or was she propped up against the wall???
An ecologist was also asked to attend
the scene. By examining the layering of
leaves over the body, it was hoped they
would be able to give some indication
as to how long the body had lain there
And what was the ecologist findings????
Because they didn't use them in court to determine how long the body had been there... it also suggests that the snow must have been underneath her... because if it hadn't then they would have know she had been there since Friday 17th December 2010!!!
Lets not forget it snowed on the Saturday 18th December 2010... So Dr Vincent Tabak could not have done it!!!!
Back to Saturday again... which they always thought by the way they acted with CJ!!!
So if we go back to Boxing Day being the day she was removed... then this is why DCI Phil Jones says the 20th Jan 2011.. he's counting 25 days after...
But Dr Delaney apparently saw her on Christmas Day??? She was in the mortuary frozen solid.. so how did they thaw the body so quickly to determine the cause of death???
Surley it would take more than 1 day ... or the same day according to this lot who's story is everywhere!!!
Once the body had been removed tothe mortuary, swabs were taken in the
hope scientists could extract enough
of the all-important DNA to get a
profile of the suspect. Clothing was
also recovered and analysed. But
extracting the DNA from the swabs
was to prove a painstaking and
complicated process.
So they take the swabs in the mortuary???? Not being funny but i find that hard to believe that they were allowed in the mortuary when Dr Delaney was doing his post mortum...
Joanna Yeates
It started as a missing person inquiry on December 18, 2010, says Lindsey Lennen, a body fluids and DNA specialist (who, like many forensic scientists, says the work is "all I ever wanted to do"). The team started by examining items from Joanna's home, looking for foreign DNA. Then on Christmas Day, Yeates was found dead, on a country road.
A colleague went down to supervise the removal of her clothing and preserve any body fluids: "The body was frozen, so that was quite tricky." Under the media glare, the work was flat-out: clothing, swabs, suspect's clothing, all analysed and turned round in 48 hours.
"Eventually, we found something," Lennen says. "On swabs and tapes from her breasts, and tapes from three areas of her jeans. There were DNA components that matched one of the suspects, Vincent Tabak." But there wasn't enough, of enough quality, to evaluate ? perhaps because of the high salt levels where the body was found, following heavy snowfall.
So the team deployed an LGC technique known as DNA SenCE, which purifies, concentrates and enhances otherwise unusable DNA: "We couldn't say whether the DNA was from saliva, or semen, or even touch. But we could say that the probability of it not being a match with Tabak was less than one in a billion."
With the killer's confession, Lennen's DNA evidence was not further tested. "It happens, in court," she says. "You get called biased, in the police's pay. You have to tell the truth, not stretch what you have. If you don't know which of two alternatives is more likely, you must say so."
https://www.lccsa.org.uk/csi-oxford-behind-the-scenes-at-britains-top-forensic-lab/Then, 25 days after the discovery
of Jo Yeates’ body, scientists made a
breakthrough. They found DNA
matching Vincent Tabak on one of
the samples recovered from her body
Now back to 48 hours... to 25 days.... they had Dr Vincent Tabak's full profile on the 31st December 2010, when he gave it in Holland...
The group comprised the most
appropriately experienced and
qualified forensic scientists, who
carried out the DNA examinations
as well as interpretation, peer review
and quality review.
“The focus group was quite specific
to this case and it worked very well as
it meant the different scientists could
come together and share their
findings.
What are her qualification actually??? the job descriptions for this company never ask for degree's or PHD's as far as I can tell with the jobs I have listed...
Can she call herself a Scientist???
Following Tabak’s conviction, DCI
Phil Jones, senior investigating officer,
said the DNA analysis was “crucial in
building a strong evidential case
against Vincent Tabak and ultimately
securing his conviction”.
Now how can the DNA be crucial when it wasn't a strong profile??? and other DNA was on her body... So what is he saying.. admitting guilt didn't do it????
EDIT:......
Dog walkers discovered her snow-covered body, laying in a foetal position against a wall, on Christmas Day.
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/joanna-yeates-fought-killer/story-13538504-detail/story.html#DRAzfbpZ2tOOTk8Q.99quote]
So if she is laying against the wall is the blood behind her???? what angle???
