I was just writing something about the sexually motivated attack that Dr Vincent Tabak was supposed to have done..
It made me think.... The whole premise of the prosecution was that Dr Vincent Tabak was looking for sexual gratification...
They used the porn and the prostitutes after the case had finished to highlight to the public, just what type of deviant he was.....
So.... Just for the moment, lets think about that... if he had employed prostitutes for his gratification and played the sex games that he did, then his experience in such matter must be top notch....
Which makes their sexual gratification theory fall flat on it's face....
I'm assuming going from the various real crime documentaries I have seen, that people who commit this type of murder take their time... They enjoy the build up..... That's where their excitement comes from...
Surley he would have restrained Joanna Yeates so he could complete his fantasy... not just attack her in the manner they claim he did....
If it only took 20 seconds as the prosecution claimed, then Dr Vincent Tabak must have suffered from premature ejaculation.. and if that was the case , why didn't the prosecution bring the evidence to support this ???
Why didn't the defence explore this avenue to put paid to the prosecutions claims it was sexually motivated?
There is so much of this case I don't buy.... The only thing I buy is that he was her neighbour...
"David Parker Ray being a case in point'....
The prosecution and the Defense had said Dr Vincent Tabak had knowledge of Greg being away... So he had no need to rush anything, he had no need to visit Asda, he could have spent that time getting his kicks...
There have been psychologist who have made statements that Dr Vincent Tabak was a serial killer in the making, then you would think he would have taken a lot more time than he did and not bothered with the Asda trip..
He would have had a rough idea as to what time Tanja was due home... So really he had hours to fullfill any fantasy he may have had....