Goncalo Amaral.

[faithlilly]

He's more like the unwelcome relative who turns up at birthday parties, demanding attention.
Intermittent media appearances (for remuneration, no doubt) are littered with far-fetched revelations and new books about the case. Quite fascinating, in a macabre sort of way.
Wolters has him rattled imo. Perhaps Amaral even gets a mention in Das Buch 1 or 2.

Like that unwelcome relative wouldn’t the best thing be to ignore him? Surely you and people who continue to give him relevance are the real problem?

[faithlilly]

Living Rent Free.  He is.

Okay.

[misty]

Like that unwelcome relative wouldn’t the best thing be to ignore him? Surely you and people who continue to give him relevance are the real problem?

Fulscher gave Amaral relevance by discussing Brueckner and the case with him in Portugal in 2020. I don't think that's worth ignoring.

[Venturi Swirl]

Like that unwelcome relative wouldn’t the best thing be to ignore him? Surely you and people who continue to give him relevance are the real problem?

No, we are not the problem, we are simply shooting the breeze on a pretty insignificant internet forum.

[Wonderfulspam]

No, we are not the problem, we are simply shooting the breeze on a pretty insignificant internet forum.

Nothing to talk about regarding Brueckner, Wolters has hit a total dead end there, so supporters might as well retreat to the safety haven of Amaral bashing I suppose.

[faithlilly]

Fulscher gave Amaral relevance by discussing Brueckner and the case with him in Portugal in 2020. I don't think that's worth ignoring.

Why?

[Brietta]

Fulscher gave Amaral relevance by discussing Brueckner and the case with him in Portugal in 2020. I don't think that's worth ignoring.

Mr Fulscher is known to have met with Amaral in Lisbon on at least two occasions to discuss the case.

I find that quite extraordinary and certainly interesting.

[faithlilly]

Mr Fulscher is known to have met with Amaral in Lisbon on at least two occasions to discuss the case.

I find that quite extraordinary and certainly interesting.

Considering his expertise in the case I’d find it extraordinary if he hadn’t wished to talk with Amaral.

[misty]

Considering his expertise in the case I’d find it extraordinary if he hadn’t wished to talk with Amaral.

Amaral had no expertise whatsoever in relation to Brueckner the person or Brueckner's alleged involvement in Madeleine's abduction/murder - unless you know otherwise.

[G-Unit]

Amaral had no expertise whatsoever in relation to Brueckner the person or Brueckner's alleged involvement in Madeleine's abduction/murder - unless you know otherwise.

If I were Brueckner's lawyer I'd definitely be interested in speaking to Amaral. He was there at the beginning and says there's no evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

[Venturi Swirl]

If I were Brueckner's lawyer I'd definitely be interested in speaking to Amaral. He was there at the beginning and says there's no evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

Then they are both idiots.

[Eleanor]

Then they are both idiots.

With a bit of desperation thrown in.  Perhaps Fulscher wanted to discuss the dreadlocks and cartoons on the van.

[Wonderfulspam]

Then they are both idiots.

The 3 investigative forces aren't having much luck proving them wrong.
But maybe tomorrow aye.

[Venturi Swirl]

Considering his expertise in the case I’d find it extraordinary if he hadn’t wished to talk with Amaral.

If I recall correctly, an example of Amaral’s expertise in this case is his claim that it would be impossible to break into Apartment 5a 

[Wonderfulspam]

With a bit of desperation thrown in.  Perhaps Fulscher wanted to discuss the dreadlocks and cartoons on the van.

Fulscher has been asking to see the concrete evidence, Brueckner is challenging Wolters to bring charges.
Doesn't seem particularly desperate to me. Quite the opposite in fact, & Wolters can't see Brueckner being charged anytime in the foreseeable future. But yeah OK.