Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 20770 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #285 on: May 03, 2021, 09:35:15 AM »
Two professional police forces who make bold claims but have presented nothing.
Not to you they haven't - is that the problem?  You feel they should have sought your approval first?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #286 on: May 03, 2021, 09:36:08 AM »
Guys, much as l love being attacked by you this BH Monday morning I have work to attend to, so pile on your interrogations and I will be back when I have done the stuff i need to do now - tara a bit.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #287 on: May 03, 2021, 09:36:19 AM »
Right - so you accept he was there at the time of the disappearance.  A paedophile and rapist with an interest in little girls and entering holiday apartments unlawfully.  Do you think he should never even have been investigated?

It's a bit pointless investigating someone if you have no abduction evidence in the first place.

Maybe that's why SY aren't investigating him.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #288 on: May 03, 2021, 09:37:09 AM »
Guys, much as l love being attacked by you this BH Monday morning I have work to attend to, so pile on your interrogations and I will be back when I have done the stuff i need to do now - tara a bit.

See if you can find some of that abduction evidence whilst you're out.

I look forward to seeing it.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #289 on: May 03, 2021, 09:46:55 AM »
Guys, much as l love being attacked by you this BH Monday morning I have work to attend to, so pile on your interrogations and I will be back when I have done the stuff i need to do now - tara a bit.

Its your opinion which is being attacked.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #290 on: May 03, 2021, 09:51:13 AM »
It's a bit pointless investigating someone if you have no abduction evidence in the first place.

Maybe that's why SY aren't investigating him.

I think it's clear the Germans have abduction evidence

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #291 on: May 03, 2021, 10:03:41 AM »
I think it's clear the Germans have abduction evidence

From 5a?  which could only have been collected by the PJ ?

Despite all of this, it was not possible to obtain any piece of evidence that would allow for a medium man, under the light of the criteria of logics, of normality and of the general rules of experience, to formulate any lucid, sensate, serious and honest conclusion about the circumstances under which the child was removed from the apartment (whether dead or alive, whether killed in a neglectful homicide or an intended homicide, whether the victim of a targeted abduction or an opportunistic abduction), nor even to produce a consistent prognosis about her destiny and inclusively - the most dramatic - to establish whether she is still alive or if she is dead, as seems more likely.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #292 on: May 03, 2021, 10:13:52 AM »
The evidence that Bruckner was in PdL that night is more solid as the Smithman evidence I would say.

Well we know for sure Brueckner exists and we know the type of rap sheet he has accumulated over the years; what do we know for certain about Smithman except that Mr Smith was unable to ID him.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #293 on: May 03, 2021, 10:26:59 AM »
I think it's clear the Germans have abduction evidence

I think it's clear the Germans have Brueckner's porn stash, dead dog & very little more.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Online Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #294 on: May 03, 2021, 10:59:43 AM »

One thing is for sure.  If Volters has got photographic evidence then we won't get to see it, even if he is convicted.

So we can all go on for years and years believing whatever we like.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #295 on: May 03, 2021, 11:01:16 AM »
From 5a?  which could only have been collected by the PJ ?

Despite all of this, it was not possible to obtain any piece of evidence that would allow for a medium man, under the light of the criteria of logics, of normality and of the general rules of experience, to formulate any lucid, sensate, serious and honest conclusion about the circumstances under which the child was removed from the apartment (whether dead or alive, whether killed in a neglectful homicide or an intended homicide, whether the victim of a targeted abduction or an opportunistic abduction), nor even to produce a consistent prognosis about her destiny and inclusively - the most dramatic - to establish whether she is still alive or if she is dead, as seems more likely.


If Wolters has a photo of Maddie with her abusers then that would be evidence of abduction.

I suggested some time ago that the evidence may be photographic and Wolters confirmed in the discovery programme that the evidence  could be photographic

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #296 on: May 03, 2021, 11:02:31 AM »
One thing is for sure.  If Volters has got photographic evidence then we won't get to see it, even if he is convicted.

So we can all go on for years and years believing whatever we like.
It would have to be shown in court so it's existence would be confirmed

Online Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #297 on: May 03, 2021, 11:06:20 AM »
It would have to be shown in court so it's existence would be confirmed

I know.  But you don't seriously believe that this would be enough for some, do you?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #298 on: May 03, 2021, 11:12:03 AM »
I think it's clear the Germans have abduction evidence

That depends on what you think is 'abduction evidence'. As at June 2020 they had no evidence placing CB in PdL on the evening of May 3rd 2007. They had evidence that a PAYE phone they believed was his was there, but not that he was using it at the time. Their appeal to the owner/user of the caller's phone was so they could ask him/her who they actually spoke to.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Angelo222

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #299 on: May 03, 2021, 11:14:13 AM »
I know.  But you don't seriously believe that this would be enough for some, do you?

Madeleine's parents have stated publicly that their child could be still alive which puts Wolters claims in the stupid box imo.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!