Has Andrew Hunter responded to the sent report ?
Can Andrew Hunter's response or part of it be posted on here ?
Has Andrew Hunter forwarded the report onto Bamber and his lawyers ?
Has Bamber or his lawyers responded to the sent report ?
Can Bamber or his lawyers response or part of it be posted ?
Was Scipio's offer of a free evaluation of the report taken up ? If not, why not as he is a qualified lawyer.
Why did Caroline believe the report was stolen from her published research from over three years ago. Which was two years before David joined this forum ?
As a passionate supporter three years ago, did Caroline pass her research findings onto anyone ?
If Caroline passed her research findings onto anyone, what was the response ?
Can Caroline's direct us to the thread on her research findings ? Thank you.
Why is other new evidence discovered by posters (usually supporters) posted on the forum. But this has not been ?
Why do the CT and Bamber make public any new evidence they find prior to a court hearing, usually to millions of people via the media, but this alleged breakthrough cannot be published on a small forum ?
Why did David seek public approval on the forum from a supporter, after the report had already been sent to Andrew Hunter ?
Why did David claim he has made a 'forensic evidence breakthrough' but then not say what it was ?
Why did another supporter publically support a report on this forum, but then refuse to say what it is ?
Is not posting the alleged forensic evidence breakthrough because 'it gives the crown more time prepare' suggesting the crown is biased ?
If the new evidence is strong, why is there concern that posting it on a small forum apparently gives the crown more time to prepare ?
Will the CCRC not already have weeks or months to prepare if Bamber submits an application if this new 'breakthrough is included ?
Will posting the alleged 'forensic evidence breakthrough' on a forum, years before any possible CCRC hearing, harm Bamber's chances ?
Do the CCRC members read this forum ?
Has there been any examples of alleged new evidence being posted on a forum, harming an appellents future appeal ?
Was David given access to previously unseen documents ?
Is the alleged 'forensic evidence breakthrough' an attempt to get the CCRC to refer the case to the COA on a technicality ?
Does the alleged 'forensic evidence breakthrough' show Bamber is innocent ? If so, how did the police make this mistake when they manipulated all other forensic evidence to show Bamber was guilty ?
Was this breakthough found out by just looking at documents and pictures which are in the public domain. David noticed something no one else has ever noticed ?
Should future new forensic evidence suggestions or alleged discoveries not be posted to prevent 'the crown from having more time to prepare' ?
