I must admit I originally went along with him being innocent mainly because the crime was so heinous that I couldn't believe for a moment that he was capable of such evil intent. The further I looked into the facts of the case though I came to realise that he was extremely cunning and conniving and was very capable of what he was being accused of. I honestly believe his adoption as a baby had much to do with the hate he later came to foster for his adoptive family.
I don't accept for a moment that anyone attempted to frame Jeremy Bamber, he concocted a convenient story to cover his crime but it soon began to unravel. Ultimately, it was his insistence that Sheila did it that was his undoing. Julie Mugford's evidence was the clincher in the end though and provided the motive for such a dreadful deed. Had she made it all up as some suggest in some sort of sordid revenge on him she would have been destroyed in the witness box. She wasn't though but by protecting him for so long in the beginning she damaged her own reputation and ultimaterly paid the price...exile.
Bamber is certainly very influential with people he engages with.
Trudie & Matt said Bamber sounding nice on the phone is one of their top 5 reasons they believe he's innocent. Experienced crime reporter Bob Woffinden was so impressed after Bamber contacted him, he supported Bamber for a short period. Later calling him a 'charming psychopath'.
Bamber discarded Mike & JackieD years ago & David's secret 'forensic evidence breakthrough' came to nothing. But Bamber certainly left a lasting impression & both Mike & David still support him. JackieD is just as determined but bases her stance on Julie rather than any forensic or circumstantial evidence.
Stephanie, who had first hand experience of being taken in by someone - Simon Hall, urged supporters to stop being gullible. Although a lot have changed stance, some will be like Stephanie and refuse to unless Bamber actually admits to the crime.