Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on Today at 11:36:53 AM »
UPDATED
👇
Scammer Sandra Lean & Her Bogus Stirling University PhD Thesis Aptly Titled “Hiding In Plain View” (Part 280)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/04/killer-luke-mitchell-scammer-sandra-lean-her-stirling-university-phd-thesis-aptly-titled-hiding-in-plain-view/
2
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on Today at 11:15:33 AM »
Donna E did a video with that misogynist Matt Elliott after the crimes that shocked Scotland TV show on 20th October 2022. Their focus appeared to be to slate JH 🙄

Donna’s latest https://youtu.be/pzz2zcq5m9o?si=nqxd8M0Et-3vYIr2 using another sock puppet - “fellow ship” 🙄

Again Donna -

on the 8th July 2003 Rosemary Walsh stated in her 1st sworn police statement

Quote from: Nicholas on November 27, 2023, 01:26:37 PM
“If I was to describe what type of jacket, I’d say a parka

Rosemary Walsh’s statement was made before killer Luke Mitchell had even worn his new replacement parka, which he had purchased from FLIP on the 8th/9th July 2003 - depending on what date was accurate
3
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on Today at 10:49:22 AM »
Quote from: Nicholas on December 04, 2023, 02:30:43 PM
James Easton - Facebook 4th December 2023
Steph Donald Some years ago, I wrote a number of published ''positive' articles, related to the  now well-known 'Rendlesham Forest, alleged, December, 1980 'UFO' incidents.
However, subsequently... quoting a related BBC article:
"James Easton, a writer specialising in UFO phenomena, recently unearthed the eyewitness reports, hidden in a released US government file.
Easton says that they make breathtaking reading. Each individual account conflicts with the other. But most damning of all is the admission that the men knew they were 'chasing lighthouse beams' from the Orford Ness lighthouse'.".
This resulted in a BBC documentary and also:
https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2006/04/from-the-archive-the-truth-about-rendlesham/
The hate e-mail basket was resultantly overflowing!
Thankfully, I am way too thick-skinned and it comes with the territory, if you are perceived as threatening to someone's deep-rooted beliefs.
Conversely, I have researched cases which were a skeptic's delight, only to evidence the opposite and you end up with their wrath!
The Luke Mitchell case is, currently, a classic example of something I wrote in 2019:
"I'm happy to sit on the fence at present, giving due consideration and respect to alternative theories. Sure, it's often a pain in the @rse sitting up here... I can see both sides though...".

 *&^^&
4
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on Today at 01:12:21 AM »
Quote from: Nicholas on Today at 12:54:53 AM
Page 2200

What was Shane Mitchell “told to….. ?

What exactly did Corinne Mitchell tell her older son Shane when she phoned him from Dalkeith police station?

And if Shane “eventually” went back to bed, what time was this?

The court of appeal judgement stated at para 159

At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

Did the appeal judges get the above wrong too or was the impression given at trial, that Shane Mitchell went to the police station earlier than he actually did?

Corinne Mitchell said her and her killer son Luke Mitchell were driven home from the police station by the police, so why did Shane Mitchell need to take clothes to the police station?

Killer Luke Mitchell would have been dropped off right to his door, no one would have seen him?

What exactly did the police officers who dealt with Corinne and killer Luke Mitchell tell the jury about the events of the night/morning of the 1st July 2003?

This is all very fishy

Killer Luke Mitchell claimed he got a torch from his brother Shane Mitchell before he went out pretending to search for Jodi Jones

Shane Mitchell did not support his killer brothers claim about the torch either

And Shane Mitchell said he didn’t hear about anything until his mother phoned and woke him up and asked him to bring killer Luke clothes to the police station

5
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on Today at 12:54:53 AM »
Quote from: Nicholas on Today at 12:36:11 AM
Where’s page 2198 of Shane Mitchell’s testimony?

https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/shane-mitchell-full-transcript-13012005.html

Page 2200

What was Shane Mitchell “told to….. ?

What exactly did Corinne Mitchell tell her older son Shane when she phoned him from Dalkeith police station?

And if Shane “eventually” went back to bed, what time was this?

The court of appeal judgement stated at para 159

At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon

Did the appeal judges get the above wrong too or was the impression given at trial, that Shane Mitchell went to the police station earlier than he actually did?

Corinne Mitchell said her and her killer son Luke Mitchell were driven home from the police station by the police, so why did Shane Mitchell need to take clothes to the police station?

Killer Luke Mitchell would have been dropped off right to his door, no one would have seen him?

What exactly did the police officers who dealt with Corinne and killer Luke Mitchell tell the jury about the events of the night/morning of the 1st July 2003?
6
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on Today at 12:36:11 AM »
Where’s page 2198 of Shane Mitchell’s testimony?

https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/shane-mitchell-full-transcript-13012005.html
7
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Last post by Nicholas on December 04, 2023, 08:02:16 PM »
Robber and violent con Scott C Forbes has today stated on Twitter;

Referring to sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s case “I’ve worked on it really for 4yrs”

Is the fantasist and fraudster back tracking knowing the ship is sinking so to speak?
8
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on December 04, 2023, 05:52:13 PM »
Christopher John Halkides
Regarding Fleming and Walsh, I don't find their testimony all that informative.  Yet it might be worth pursuing the issue of the jogger that they also saw.  Sandra Lean wrote that the jogger was found and went on to indicate that the jogger's route would place their alleged sighting of Luke closer to where he said he was, and therefore further from the entrance to the path.

James Easton
Christopher John Halkides Absolutely agreed re the jogger and thank you for the so meaningful contributions.

When have you ever seen Rosemary Walsh and Lorraine Fleming full testimony? 🙄

Rosemary Walsh and Lorraine Fleming saw killer Luke Mitchell at the wooden gate

A photograph of the wooden gate can be viewed here 👇 - taken by former policeman John in 2009


Scammer Sandra Lean & Her Laughable Eye Witness Testimony; Carol Heatlie, Rosemary Walsh, Lorraine Fleming, Andrina Bryson, Marion O’Sullivan, Derek Hamilton, Andrew Holburn, Dean Houston, Grant Elliot & The Jogger “Trick” (Part 43)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/04/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-43/


Scammer Sandra Lean stated in her 2nd innocence fraud book page 126;

“Lorraine Fleming and Rosemary Walsh were sisters-in-law, who said they saw a youth who could have been Luke on the Newbattle Road, close to the entrance to the path.


There are two photographs in the above blog that show where the entrance to the path was in comparison to the wooden gate, where the two witnesses said they saw killer Luke Mitchell
9
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on December 04, 2023, 04:26:58 PM »
James Easton on the 19th November 2023 you stated on Twitter

“The transcripts are gradually being purchased by those who are well known as expressing concerns re a possible unsafe conviction”

Who are the people who are “well known as expressing concerns re a possible unsafe conviction” ?

Were you referring to yourself and you daughter and son?
10
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Last post by Nicholas on December 04, 2023, 02:46:02 PM »
Quote from: Nicholas on December 04, 2023, 02:30:43 PM
James Easton - Facebook 4th December 2023
Steph Donald Some years ago, I wrote a number of published ''positive' articles, related to the  now well-known 'Rendlesham Forest, alleged, December, 1980 'UFO' incidents.
However, subsequently... quoting a related BBC article:
"James Easton, a writer specialising in UFO phenomena, recently unearthed the eyewitness reports, hidden in a released US government file.
Easton says that they make breathtaking reading. Each individual account conflicts with the other. But most damning of all is the admission that the men knew they were 'chasing lighthouse beams' from the Orford Ness lighthouse'.".
This resulted in a BBC documentary and also:
https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2006/04/from-the-archive-the-truth-about-rendlesham/
The hate e-mail basket was resultantly overflowing!
Thankfully, I am way too thick-skinned and it comes with the territory, if you are perceived as threatening to someone's deep-rooted beliefs.
Conversely, I have researched cases which were a skeptic's delight, only to evidence the opposite and you end up with their wrath!
The Luke Mitchell case is, currently, a classic example of something I wrote in 2019:
“I'm happy to sit on the fence at present, giving due consideration and respect to alternative theories. Sure, it's often a pain in the @rse sitting up here... I can see both sides though...".

If you are “way too thick-skinned” as you allege, why won’t you answer questions here?

It appears to many of us that you and your daughter perceive this forum as “threatening” - why?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10