"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Paulpeter Mck
Everyone in in any Luke Mitchell fb group apparently we are not making friends with the people we meet @
Pop up Protest in Support of Luke Mitchell according to admin from a certain group.
I don’t know about them but I make friends. We are not just here for you we’re here for Luke and Jodi to get Justice.

Paulpeter Mck
Kareen Kenny well apparently they’re not friends which I don’t think I’ve made lots of friends great people

Andrew Robertson
Paulpeter Mck Your definitely not alone mate
Next steps in the campaign planning
1. Learn how to shake the bucket better for Sandra.
2. Be more convincing with raffle tickets that you just happen to have.
3. Avoid looking glaikit standing holding a t-shirt next to Sandra.
4. Start a focus group on how to push away as many supporters as possible with your...I failed charm school manners (but passed how to be a mental stalker school with straight A’s)
5. Tell everyone only what they say and do matters.
6. Overcompensate for the inadequacies at not being successful in Luke’s campaign (seems more like fail to plan.......).

Paulpeter Mck
I don’t see how this is hurting the campaign people deserve the truth in Luke’s case the people helping with the campaign deserve to know what’s going on.
I’m not alone in this thought process.

Paulpeter Mck
Karen McGuire they barred me from the 2 groups connected to the same folk. I have done nothing wrong on the page this is purely personal.

Paulpeter Mck
Karen McGuire that’s what I feel. It’s like they’re holding back my stuff because they have nothing of their own. Giving out rubbish excuses then ban you for speaking up. Awful so it is.
EGOS ARE A BIG PART OF IT I BELIEVE.

Caroline Dochi
Karen McGuire I no longer comment ! Oh asked where protest was yesterday x  iam an observer  and simply like or love comments ! X  was DISGUSTED  to learn a certain person is bACK in the follow and was at EDINBURGH PROTEST WHEN we were  there  x a simply sorry for the vile messages she sent me would be a start ! Reached out  to a few others to Try and sort this but no JOY !  And was told by a certain other no one cared about me moaning so sadly I feel disgusted that this is happening!!! This RENT A GOB WILL  see her!!!

Caroline Dochi
Karen McGuire oh soz I forgot I wasnt the only person this lady HURT  and was VILE  with x x sadly why others groups were made x x

Paulpeter Mck
No2 shake the bucket for Luke not Sandra

[Nicholas]

“NEW TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrial.blogspot.com/2023/11/new-trial-transcripts.html

[Nicholas]

‘BIRTHDAY BASH' FUNDRAISING
👇
https://lukemitchelltrial.blogspot.com/2023/11/birthday-bash-fundraising.html

[Nicholas]

“AVAILABILITY OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS - THE RECENT TIMELINE”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrial.blogspot.com/2023/11/availability-of-trial-transcripts.html

[faithlilly]

“NEW TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrial.blogspot.com/2023/11/new-trial-transcripts.html

The search party don’t come across particularly well or as particularly honest witnesses.

[Chris_Halkides]

It turns out that the members of the search party changed what they said in their initial statements.*  Some on this forum said otherwise.  I am looking forward to hearing the responses of these forum members to the new information.
EDT
*[Name removed] argued that perhaps her words were not taken down correctly, etc.  SK claimed to have forgotten a number of things.

[Nicholas]

Luke Mitchell's 'cult followers' fundraiser banned one mile from where body of Jodi Jones found
👇
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/birthday-event-planned-evil-killer-31479310#:~:text=Dalkeith%20Masonic%20Hall.-,The%20event%20next%20month%20was%20billed%20as%20a%20“birthday%20party,safety%20of%20those%20taking%20part.

[Bullseye]

The search party don’t come across particularly well or as particularly honest witnesses.

I got so angry reading some of the transcripts, I understand they think Luke is guilty and are doing all they can to make sure he is found guilty by the courts but imo the blatant lies ‘I can’t remember’ and statements clearly changed to suit the prosecution is outrageous, if Luke is found innocent I hope they can live with themselves as they would have helped get the real murderer off with their lies. Basically sorting the evidence to suit a guilty verdict and Janine is now a police officer??? Seriously! Clearly won’t having a problem fitting someone else up she thinks is guilty.  Even if they are right and it was Luke the way they went about it is so wrong, no wonder people wonder if he is innocent, seems the family are part to blame for all the questions still being asked.

[faithlilly]

It turns out that the members of the search party changed what they said in their initial statements.*  Some on this forum said otherwise.  I am looking forward to hearing the responses of these forum members to the new information.
EDT
*[Name removed] argued that perhaps her words were not taken down correctly, etc.  SK claimed to have forgotten a number of things.

I really don’t buy Janine’s excuse for the difference in her initial statements and court testimony. Once a statement has been taken the statement is read by the witness and signed as a true reflection of their words. If there is anything that is incorrect or has been misinterpreted that is the time to correct the statement.

[Rusty]

I am looking forward to hearing the responses of these forum members to the new information.

Case is closed. That is the only response you deserve.

[Rusty]

I got so angry reading some of the transcripts, I understand they think Luke is guilty and are doing all they can to make sure he is found guilty by the courts but imo the blatant lies ‘I can’t remember’ and statements clearly changed to suit the prosecution is outrageous, if Luke is found innocent I hope they can live with themselves as they would have helped get the real murderer off with their lies. Basically sorting the evidence to suit a guilty verdict and Janine is now a police officer??? Seriously! Clearly won’t having a problem fitting someone else up she thinks is guilty.  Even if they are right and it was Luke the way they went about it is so wrong, no wonder people wonder if he is innocent, seems the family are part to blame for all the questions still being asked.

Amazing how you ignore the transcripts regarding the jacket, that you have been bleating on about for years, come out from under your rock and start bleating on about statements 

[Chris_Halkides]

Case is closed. That is the only response you deserve.

The people who claimed that the prosecution's witnesses did not change their stories were shown to be wrong.  The polite thing to do is to acknowledge one's error.  The intellectually honest thing to do is to explain how one's view of the case changed.  Neither of these two has happened so far.

[Rusty]

The people who claimed that the prosecution's witnesses did not change their stories were shown to be wrong.  The polite thing to do is to acknowledge one's error.  The intellectually honest thing to do is to explain how one's view of the case changed.  Neither of these two has happened so far.

It has already been explained multiple times. But you have a closed mind, with fingers in one's ears, when it suits. & that mind has already decided that Mitchell is innocent. So your attempt of a gotta moment, may give the hardliner's egos a boost. But the fact of the matter is > case is closed.

P.S You should book your flight and get yourself to the fundraiser, I'm sure you will enjoy sitting amongst those housewives on their one night out a year jolly 

[Mr Apples]

The search party don’t come across particularly well or as particularly honest witnesses.

I think AW did come across as genuine and accurate in her testimony. As for the other two, their testimonies read like a bit of a dog's dinner, though, in their defence, were relatively young and confronted by one of the most heinous and notorious murder cases ever. Going to court in any capacity is a particularly disagreeable experience for most people, so two people in their late teens who weren't recidivists/delinquents used to appearing in court frequently can surely be excused for dithering or being inconsistent in their evidence, especially given the high profile of the case and the enormity of the crime? I don't think they were colluding, conspiring or lying on the stand; they were, imo, overwhelmed and intimidated by appearing in a High Court (SK and JudJ even ran out of the courtroom screaming at certain points of the case, such was their trauma) for a brutal & savage murder case of a fourteen-year old girl who just happened to be one of the aforementioned witness's younger sister. And even if SK and JANJ were being slightly underhand when giving evidence or inconsistent, such was the strength of the evidence against LM that it didn't really matter. LM was/is, imo, guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

[Bullseye]

Amazing how you ignore the transcripts regarding the jacket, that you have been bleating on about for years, come out from under your rock and start bleating on about statements 

Regards the parka transcripts it’s only Corrines transcripts and not the actual witness transcripts.  It come across to me Corrine is adamant Luke did not have a parka and her story never changed (unlike the 3 people who changed their statement then conveniently at time of trial could not remember the dog jumping up at the wall)  If it was his father’s new partner, one of his best friends or someone close to him that saw him in a parka that would hold more weight for me therefore I still have reasonable doubt on the parka with the evidence to hand. Be good to see the transcripts from these witnesses also.