Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
It won't. There's nobody here to react, particularly as they're haemorraging supporters.
I am surprised at the total lack of reaction to the comprehensive, career-ending anihilation though, given the reamifications going forward.

September 17th iirc. That is the end of Brueckner's sentence. Wolters needs to pull his finger out & find some actual evidence against the man. Even if there is a retrial, that won't take place until well after that date & given the weakness of the evidence presented in the first trial I fail to see how he can be kept on remand.
2
It won't. There's nobody here to react, particularly as they're haemorraging supporters.
I am surprised at the total lack of reaction to the comprehensive, career-ending anihilation though, given the reamifications going forward.
*claps hands* I don’t care about anyone else but ai am longing for the day HCW is dragged kicking and screaming from the Prosecutor’s office in Braunsweig and forced to parade naked through town with a dumkopf sign around his neck.  But why hasn’t it happened yet??  This is the puzzling thing.
3
I'm sure you're familiar with why Ms Moyet stuck with the name Alf? Quite an inspiring tale of defiance in the face of veiled misogyny.
More than familiar dear.
4
I know you're new to all this sceptic malarkey, but essentially maybe they double dosed, with GM doing it, then KM also administering a dose (overdose). It’s not as if the children in the party were exhibiting the best of health during the holiday, with sickness seemingly commonplace.
I see. So one dose has a sedative effect and a second dose acts like an antidote to the first dose making them wake up and wander around in a daze?  I see, thanks for the clarification. 
6
What do you want to know: pre-Vince or post-Vince?
I'm sure you're familiar with why Ms Moyet stuck with the name Alf? Quite an inspiring tale of defiance in the face of veiled misogyny.
7
Bravo!  An excellent point, and made so provocatively I hope it sparks the reaction you were looking for x
It won't. There's nobody here to react, particularly as they're haemorraging supporters.
I am surprised at the total lack of reaction to the comprehensive, career-ending anihilation though, given the reamifications going forward.
8
I’m not familiar with this theory, please explain.
I know you're new to all this sceptic malarkey, but essentially maybe they double dosed, with GM doing it, then KM also administering a dose (overdose). It’s not as if the children in the party were exhibiting the best of health during the holiday, with sickness seemingly commonplace.
9
I've been reading back over the year I missed and subsequently exhumed a few threads, I notice with concern the almost total vacuum that is the supporter reaction to the utter drubbing of HCW. It's almost as if their world has changed irrevocably, having been utterly convinced that this first trial was merely the opening salvo of what they were sure would be their Waterloo. OK, it turned out to be their Agincourt, with HCW cast as the hapless and witless d'Albret, so I can understand the bitterness and reluctance to comment, but come on guys, let's get it off our chests.
After all, there's more disappointment ahead for you guys, might as well resign yourselves to defeat and maybe follow VS / Alf and throw the towel in.
Bravo!  An excellent point, and made so provocatively I hope it sparks the reaction you were looking for x
10
You neglect to mention the 'double dose' theory. It's possible.
I’m not familiar with this theory, please explain.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10