Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
You don’t question the motives of a career criminal who left an elderly lady with no recourse to justice for 11 years after a brutal rape?

You do realise that if Brueckner did abduct and murder Madeleine and if the information given to the police by Busching was given to them when Busching found the alleged tape Brueckner would have been in custody in 2007 and Madeleine would still be with her family. What a low life eh?

Anyway thankfully the court saw Busching and Seyferth for what they were. It’s a pity however that Hazel Behan was probably denied justice because of them.

He did report it earlier they dismissed him.
23
And the trial recently when  Brueckner was judged to be innocent of the rape of the two women on the alleged tape.

Could you please do your research Lace?

Don't know what you are talking about unless it was CB's lawyer saying this he believes CB is innocent of everything.
24
You don’t question the motives of a career criminal who left an elderly lady with no recourse to justice for 11 years after a brutal rape?

You do realise that if Brueckner did abduct and murder Madeleine and if the information given to the police by Busching was given to them when Busching found the alleged tape Brueckner would have been in custody in 2007 and Madeleine would still be with her family. What a low life eh?

Anyway thankfully the court saw Busching and Seyferth for what they were. It’s a pity however that Hazel Behan was probably denied justice because of them.

She had her day in court. The evidence to convict was  deemed inadequate.
25
You don’t question the motives of a career criminal who left an elderly lady with no recourse to justice for 11 years after a brutal rape?

You do realise that if Brueckner did abduct and murder Madeleine and if the information given to the police by Busching was given to them when Busching found the alleged tape Brueckner would have been in custody in 2007 and Madeleine would still be with her family. What a low life eh?

Anyway thankfully the court saw Busching and Seyferth for what they were. It’s a pity however that Hazel Behan was probably denied justice because of them.
And once again you deflect from all the points made in my previous post.  Why?
No, I don’t question the motives of the “career criminal” because as far as the discussion we were having (that you clearly no longer want to be having) they were irrelevant.  He obviously wasn’t lying about what he saw on the tape because his account so clearly matched many of the details of an actual rape that had been reported that he knew nothing about and for which there was supporting DNA evidence.  You still seem to think he made it up though, so please explain the enormous coincidences if this were the case?  HB was only denied justice if CB actually was her rapist just as the two so-cslled hobos said, so why are you blaming them for the fact that she didn’t get it?  How much justice would she have got had these two characters never come forward to the police at all?  Oh, and Madeleine fell off a balcony and her Daddy chucked her in a bin, so no worries about justice for her on that score, eh?
26
No idea, don’t care.  You’re simply deflecting from every point I’ve made.  Why?

You don’t question the motives of a career criminal who left an elderly lady with no recourse to justice for 11 years after a brutal rape?

You do realise that if Brueckner did abduct and murder Madeleine and if the information given to the police by Busching was given to them when Busching found the alleged tape Brueckner would have been in custody in 2007 and Madeleine would still be with her family. What a low life eh?

Anyway thankfully the court saw Busching and Seyferth for what they were. It’s a pity however that Hazel Behan was probably denied justice because of them.
27
Busching and Seyferth allegedly saw the tape in 2006. The information was given to the police in 2017, 11 years later when one of these career criminals were caught human trafficking. Why didn’t they go to the police with the tape?
No idea, don’t care.  You’re simply deflecting from every point I’ve made.  Why?
28
For a start you could admit that without the “hobos” evidence about the video tape Diana Menkes would never have got justice but you’re never going to do that are you?  Then you’d need to explain how they managed to decribe a rapist’s modus operandi in such explicit detail that it matched an actual reported rape of a woman they’d never heard of at the time they reported it to the police, was it just a massively startling coincidence?  And finally having pointed the finger at CB as the perpetrator before knowing anything about DM’s rape you’d need to rationalize another massive coincidence- the fact that his dna was discovered in the victim’s bed.  If anyone is dying on this hill it sure as hell ain’t me honey!

Busching and Seyferth allegedly saw the tape in 2006. The information was given to the police in 2017, 11 years later when one of these career criminals were caught human trafficking. Why didn’t they go to the police with the tape?
29

I think it's just a lot of confusion.  The old lady may have been unidentified when the Police were told about the video's but when the DNA was taken and matched to the hair they found out who she was.  I don't believe there is another old lady that he raped.  Even the girl sounds the same as the one they spoke about on the video.

Do you think the girl on the alleged tape is Hazel Behan?
30
No one is saving my blushes.  It was for Diana's trial they give their evidence.

And the trial recently when  Brueckner was judged to be innocent of the rape of the two women on the alleged tape.

Could you please do your research Lace?
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10