Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2095786 times)

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16485 on: February 14, 2026, 11:26:14 PM »
Well, I still post on Twitter under Joe Blogs if you want to read my posts or replies, Vertigo!
Although I have never posted anything about Madeleine McCann, mostly Luke Mitchell!
I think I manage to conduct myself with reasonable restraint!   ?{)(**
I?m sure you do, you have always been a model of decorum on here (unlike myself who has been in trouble with the mods more times than I?ve had hot dinners).
 I?m not massively interested in Luke Mitchell?s case, but joined in with the discussion after watching Sandra Mclean?s tv documentary.  I thought at the time it was a very convincing argument but having read some of the threads about it on this forum I felt her progrsmme was very biased and not particularly honest in its presentation.  I can?t remember specifics now, so don?t ask me which bits.  Personally I think he?s guilty but as with Lucy Letby I can see the argument for a retrial.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2026, 10:25:19 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16486 on: February 15, 2026, 12:22:00 AM »
I?m sure you do, you have always been a model of decorum on here (unlike myself who has been in trouble with the mods more times than I?ve had hot dinners?. I?m not massively interested in Luke Mitchell?s case, but koined in with the discussion after watching Sandra Mclean?s tv documentary.  I thought at the time it was a very convincing argument but having read some of the threads about it on this forum I felt her progrsmme was very biased and not particularly honest in its presentation.  I can?t remember specifics now, so don?t ask me which bits.  Personally I think he?s guilty but as with Lucy Letby I can see the argument for a retrial.
Well Luke Mitchells campaign team say there's an important piece of evidence in his favour coming soon, Vertigo! Hopefully there will be a retrial.
As for Letby, after listening to her full cross examination trial transcript, I am inclined to think she is guilty as charged!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16487 on: February 15, 2026, 07:43:50 AM »
Well Luke Mitchells campaign team say there's an important piece of evidence in his favour coming soon, Vertigo! Hopefully there will be a retrial.
As for Letby, after listening to her full cross examination trial transcript, I am inclined to think she is guilty as charged!
I?d be wary of promises of evidence that?s going to blow the case sky high.  We?ve had this in the McCann case with the cop who was sacked off it claiming to have an ace up his sleeve that would result in charges agsinst Kate and Gerry, not to mention the latest conman Bernt Stellander who has promised his faithful flock that he has video evidence of them up to no good on a cliff at Madeleines?s gravesite but claims ?the time is not yet right? to release it.  Why make out ?good news? is coming soon, why not just cut to the chase and reveal it? 
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16488 on: February 15, 2026, 01:26:12 PM »
I?d be wary of promises of evidence that?s going to blow the case sky high.  We?ve had this in the McCann case with the cop who was sacked off it claiming to have an ace up his sleeve that would result in charges agsinst Kate and Gerry, not to mention the latest conman Bernt Stellander who has promised his faithful flock that he has video evidence of them up to no good on a cliff at Madeleines?s gravesite but claims ?the time is not yet right? to release it.  Why make out ?good news? is coming soon, why not just cut to the chase and reveal it?
I'm not sure why the new LM evidence hasn't been released yet, Vertigo! Probably due to legal reasons.
As you know, LM secured a new legal team last year, so maybe they have uncovered something important?
I really dont know, but I dont think his campaign team would be advertising a breakthrough if it wasn't true!
« Last Edit: February 15, 2026, 03:43:16 PM by Joe Blogs »

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16489 on: February 15, 2026, 01:51:40 PM »
Here are some articles to help you decide. None of the witnesses have any connection to the Tapas 9, just to the alleged abductor/murderer.
https://news.sky.com/story/christian-b-former-cellmate-said-madeleine-mccann-suspect-bragged-about-a-portugal-abduction-german-court-hears-13221997

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-suspect-told-barmaid-22153710

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/prime-suspect-in-maddie-mccann-disappearance-knows-what-happened-to-her-his-ex-claims/news-story/8500a8d5c206207c48e2f21a4694877b

Please also bear in mind that, as long as the elusive Smithman remains unidentified, a potential abductor still exists.

Please also bear in mind that, as long as the elusive Smithman remains unidentified, a potential abductor still exists.

What also one should bear in mind.

There is no evidence... there was an abductor in the first place.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16490 on: February 15, 2026, 01:53:16 PM »
I?d be wary of promises of evidence that?s going to blow the case sky high.  We?ve had this in the McCann case with the cop who was sacked off it claiming to have an ace up his sleeve that would result in charges agsinst Kate and Gerry, not to mention the latest conman Bernt Stellander who has promised his faithful flock that he has video evidence of them up to no good on a cliff at Madeleines?s gravesite but claims ?the time is not yet right? to release it.  Why make out ?good news? is coming soon, why not just cut to the chase and reveal it?

Why make out ?good news? is coming soon, why not just cut to the chase and reveal it?

Well, you could ask the same with the German prosecutor's.why they never have.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16491 on: February 15, 2026, 01:54:13 PM »
True, Twitter is the worst.  I spent a few months on the mccann hashtag and it truly was a bizarre and deeply unpleasant experience.  I look in from time to time and it?s odd to see the few diehards still tweeting the same misinformation about the case day in day out for all they?re worth.  I doubt they will ever give up.

Sounds a bit similar with your posts on C.B.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16492 on: February 15, 2026, 02:15:09 PM »
Sounds a bit similar with your posts on C.B.
Really?  I post endless misinformation about CB do I? Fascinating.  Kizzy, perhaps you could give us a few examples?  No, didn?t think so.
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16493 on: February 15, 2026, 02:17:52 PM »
Why make out ?good news? is coming soon, why not just cut to the chase and reveal it?

Well, you could ask the same with the German prosecutor's.why they never have.
There is a difference.  HCW is part of an ongoing police investigation and therefore not at liberty to reveal every single piece of information he may have to the public, but those like Bert Stellander who claim they have something up their sleeve but are just waiting for the right moment to burst the whole case open are simply charlatans that don?t deserve the time of day.  IMO.
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16494 on: February 15, 2026, 02:19:06 PM »
I'm not sure why the LM hasn't been released yet, Vertigo! Probably due to legal reasons.
As you know, LM secured a new legal team last year, so maybe they have uncovered something important?
I really dont know, but I dont think his campaign team would be advertising a breakthrough if it wasn't true!
My point is - why advertise a breakthrough, why not just remain silent until they actually reveal the breakthrough?  What are they waiting for?
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16495 on: February 15, 2026, 03:49:44 PM »
My point is - why advertise a breakthrough, why not just remain silent until they actually reveal the breakthrough?  What are they waiting for?
I dont know, Vertigo! As I said, the new legal team will no doubt be in charge!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16496 on: February 15, 2026, 03:55:39 PM »
I dont know, Vertigo! As I said, the new legal team will no doubt be in charge!
I guess if you?re paying a legal team thousands of pounds you?ve got to give the impression that it?s actually doing something positive.   Why though has it taken so many years to get to this point?  I just had a look at the campaign website and was very struck by Luke Mitchell?s handwritten note.  What is it about these prisoners that makes them have such disturbing handwriting?!  Christian Bruckner?s writing is equally as weird.
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16497 on: February 15, 2026, 04:06:17 PM »
There is a difference.  HCW is part of an ongoing police investigation and therefore not at liberty to reveal every single piece of information he may have to the public, but those like Bert Stellander who claim they have something up their sleeve but are just waiting for the right moment to burst the whole case open are simply charlatans that don?t deserve the time of day.  IMO.

Again.

HCW -  does not have any credible  evidence   against CB.

It seems C.B. will never be charged with the abduction of Maddie.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16498 on: February 15, 2026, 04:58:50 PM »
I guess if you?re paying a legal team thousands of pounds you?ve got to give the impression that it?s actually doing something positive.   Why though has it taken so many years to get to this point?  I just had a look at the campaign website and was very struck by Luke Mitchell?s handwritten note.  What is it about these prisoners that makes them have such disturbing handwriting?!  Christian Bruckner?s writing is equally as weird.
Haha! i'm no handwriting expert, Vertigo!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16499 on: February 15, 2026, 05:17:39 PM »
Again.

HCW -  does not have any credible  evidence   against CB.

It seems C.B. will never be charged with the abduction of Maddie.
It seems the McCanns will never be charged about her disappearance either.  And your point is??
Not a handwriting expert.