Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1

OKAY,  Everyone has bogged off because this is going nowhere.  And basically no one wants to talk about The Statute of Limitations.  The McCanns are done now.  And did we ever think that it would come to this?

How any Country could put a Fifteen Year limitation on the death of a small child completely defeats me.  But that is what Portugal has done.  The McCanns are now free from prosecution, ever.
2
Since first encountering some of the absolutely vile McCann content available on the internet it has been obvious to me and of greatest concern, that the most vulnerable to it was always going to be the McCann children.

After a two week inquest a coroner finds that in the death of fourteen year old Molly Russell, harmful online content was likely to have contributed to Molly’s death ‘in a more than minimal way’. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/30/molly-russell-died-while-suffering-negative-effects-of-online-content-rules-coroner

It was always abusive to indulge in the McCann hate fest on the internet.  It was always obvious that at some future time Madeleine's siblings would be exposed to it in one way or another.
Indeed I have seen it claimed in mitigation by sceptic offenders, the hope that the children will "question" their parents.

If these sceptics were too obtuse to work out exactly how abusive their hobby of attacking the family is - they most certainly don't have that excuse now.

Internet content on social media has yet again played its part in influencing the death of a young person.  "Anti facebook groups etc." have been deliberately posting content which will cause distress to the young people exposed to it for years.

It is a measure of the type of individuals they are.

Unfortunately, The McCanns can no longer be pursued  in Portugal. Statute of something or another.  So that's the end of that.  Unless Germany want to take them on, along with Brueckner.

This could get interesting.  No doubt someone will come up with something.       
3
You sure there General?
Just seen a few more videos on youtube regarding mccann loss to ECHR, people are having an emphatic celebration!

Since first encountering some of the absolutely vile McCann content available on the internet it has been obvious to me and of greatest concern, that the most vulnerable to it was always going to be the McCann children.

After a two week inquest a coroner finds that in the death of fourteen year old Molly Russell, harmful online content was likely to have contributed to Molly’s death ‘in a more than minimal way’. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/30/molly-russell-died-while-suffering-negative-effects-of-online-content-rules-coroner

It was always abusive to indulge in the McCann hate fest on the internet.  It was always obvious that at some future time Madeleine's siblings would be exposed to it in one way or another.
Indeed I have seen it claimed in mitigation by sceptic offenders, the hope that the children will "question" their parents.

If these sceptics were too obtuse to work out exactly how abusive their hobby of attacking the family is - they most certainly don't have that excuse now.

Internet content on social media has yet again played its part in influencing the death of a young person.  "Anti facebook groups etc." have been deliberately posting content which will cause distress to the young people exposed to it for years.

It is a measure of the type of individuals they are.
8
Is it just me or is Eleanor trying to goad us into defending paedophilia?

It seems strange & very off topic.

Beats me. Imo none of her posts are relevant to mine.
10
I see no defending going on.

Is it just me or is Eleanor trying to goad us into defending paedophilia?

It seems strange & very off topic.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10