Women don't usually pose much of a threat to other women who are walking home of an evening. If a woman is going to be attacked or kidnapped on her walk home the perpetrator will almost certainly be a man. A woman might help him cover up his crime but the initial act will almost always be carried out by the male of the species. What gives this sort of man the sense that they are entitled to commit these acts I wonder? I would fully expect your reply to be one of victim-blaming, because that would be the typical WUM response. Perhaps you can rise above the impulse to do so on this occasion, or is it outwith your control?
You're making too many assumptions for someone who believes in the presumption of innocence imo
You're presuming...
1) That she was attacked or kidnapped
2) That the womans only action in the crime was covering it up.
& 3) That the arrested man is guilty.
I haven't seen any evidence supporting this.