Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 1168767 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1350 on: August 02, 2016, 03:18:50 PM »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1351 on: August 02, 2016, 03:56:44 PM »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1352 on: August 02, 2016, 04:14:31 PM »
Dad who reported baby abducted from parking lot charged with murder

August 1, 2016

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kaylynn-crawford-missing-ohio-dad-who-reported-baby-abducted-from-parking-lot-charged-with-murder/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab6a&linkId=27179471

This is the sort of drip-drip innuendo I object to, strenuously.

Because someone (somewhere) did report an 'abduction' when they were, themselves, culpable, it (apparently!) follows that every couple to file a similar report must also, themselves, be guilty (of something culpable). 

It really is the most reprehensible way to carry on.  Collumbo would be ashamed (I'm sure).  Whoever created that television character made Collumbo of much sterner (and more rigorous) stuff than that.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1353 on: August 02, 2016, 04:19:31 PM »

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1354 on: August 02, 2016, 04:41:46 PM »
What can we deduce from this story Pathfinder...?

Yet another dysfunctional family with an abusive father who had undergone anger management and whose wife and the child he subsequently murdered were under a protection order which barred him from contact with them.
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/08/01/countywide-search-underway-missing-infant/87904278/

It isn't really 'wandering Off Topic' more like careering uncontrollably.



"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1355 on: August 02, 2016, 04:57:32 PM »
What can we deduce from this story Pathfinder...?

Child Abduction by a Stranger is Very Rare.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1356 on: August 02, 2016, 05:13:00 PM »
Child Abduction by a Stranger is Very Rare.

And?

You only have to know it happens.

Peter Voisey (from the bath of a ground-floor flat while all the family was at home).

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1357 on: August 02, 2016, 05:52:38 PM »
Child Abduction by a Stranger is Very Rare.
We already know that.  Your story does not rule it out in this case though does it?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1358 on: August 02, 2016, 10:20:53 PM »
IIRC. one of the waiters claimed to have phoned, Robbity.  I cant remember which one .... Maybe Jeronimo, but am not sure
OK the two last calls were 12 minutes apart but what about the one at 9:22 did that come from PDL?  That might have been someone reporting strange goings on in and around apartment G5A.
The two (12 minutes apart) calls could almost be considered the one call, but it is the earlier one that fascinates me the most.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline mercury

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1359 on: August 02, 2016, 11:04:05 PM »
OK the two last calls were 12 minutes apart but what about the one at 9:22 did that come from PDL?  That might have been someone reporting strange goings on in and around apartment G5A.
The two (12 minutes apart) calls could almost be considered the one call, but it is the earlier one that fascinates me the most.

Whose number is it being called at 21 22?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1360 on: August 02, 2016, 11:34:28 PM »
Whose number is it being called at 21 22?
What I have noted is that the number that called at 21:21:55  is the same number that also calls after the two calls from the Ocean Club (the highlighted ones)  this 2nd call was from 962414590 which is received by the police at 22:59:11 which is the time the first 2 GNR Police arrive at PDL.???
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pegasus

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1361 on: August 03, 2016, 12:08:29 AM »
OK the two last calls were 12 minutes apart but what about the one at 9:22 did that come from PDL?  That might have been someone reporting strange goings on in and around apartment G5A.
The two (12 minutes apart) calls could almost be considered the one call, but it is the earlier one that fascinates me the most.
Robbity the list you posted (page 3051) is calls from OC.
OC=2827710xx
GNR=282762809
« Last Edit: August 03, 2016, 12:12:53 AM by pegasus »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1362 on: August 03, 2016, 12:15:55 AM »
Robbity the list you posted is calls from OC.
OC=2827710xx
GNR=282762809
Thanks for that correction, so do we have: "What I have noted is that the number that is called from Ocean Club at 21:21:55  is the same number that is also called after the two calls from the Ocean Club (the highlighted ones) to the PNR.
This 2nd call was to 962414590 which is made at 22:59:11 which is the time the first 2 GNR Police arrive at PDL.???"
Does that make better sense?

Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline mercury

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1363 on: August 03, 2016, 12:28:53 AM »
What I have noted is that the number that called at 21:21:55  is the same number that also calls after the two calls from the Ocean Club (the highlighted ones)  this 2nd call was from 962414590 which is received by the police at 22:59:11 which is the time the first 2 GNR Police arrive at PDL.???

The number endng 459 is the number called not the number called from, so
There is no call recieved by police at 22 59 , their number is different...someone will correct if i am wrong

Offline pegasus

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1364 on: August 03, 2016, 12:32:16 AM »
(snip) ... call was from 962414590 which is received by the police at 22:59:11 ...(snip)
Robbity the call at 22:59:11 is from OC to a mobile, and it doesn't involve the GNR at all.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2016, 01:28:47 PM by John »