Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 1804289 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15615 on: March 07, 2025, 01:16:37 PM »
What I find sick is that this woman is free to continually smear a man who has been proven innocent in a court of law.  It isn't fair & I hope for her sake she has some savings in the bank because she'll need it for when Brueckner sues her.
He hasn't been proven innocent.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15616 on: March 07, 2025, 02:31:51 PM »
He hasn't been proven innocent.

Yes he has. Prior to the trial he was presumed innocent. The court found him not guilty. That means he's innocent again. Unless you're suggesting that he's now presumed somehow less innocent than he was before the time of the trial which cleared him?
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15617 on: March 07, 2025, 04:41:50 PM »
Yes he has. Prior to the trial he was presumed innocent. The court found him not guilty. That means he's innocent again. Unless you're suggesting that he's now presumed somehow less innocent than he was before the time of the trial which cleared him?
Wrong.  He was presumed innocent and has been found not guilty, because (according to the crazy woman who calls herself a judge) there was not enough evidence to convict beyond reasonable doubt.  He has not been proved innocent, unless you would like to list all the evidence here which proves he did not commit the crimes of
- rape
- molesting a child on the beach
- exposing himself to children at a playground
etc.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15618 on: March 07, 2025, 05:04:55 PM »
Wrong.  He was presumed innocent and has been found not guilty, because (according to the crazy woman who calls herself a judge) there was not enough evidence to convict beyond reasonable doubt.  He has not been proved innocent, unless you would like to list all the evidence here which proves he did not commit the crimes of
- rape
- molesting a child on the beach
- exposing himself to children at a playground
etc.

He didn't rape Behan, molest children or expose himself. He was found not guilty based on ALL the FACTS & EVIDENCE. Therefore he is innocent & I'll continue to refer to him as innocent because that's what he is. The McCanns are yet to be proven innocent though.
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15619 on: March 07, 2025, 06:04:26 PM »
More from Hazel Behan plus embedded podcast...

https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/hazel-behan-madeleine-mccann-suspect-34803912
I’ve just watched the whole podcast and I must say she comes across as a fiercely brave and credible person.  She has absolutely no doubt whatsoever the CB raped her and she has nothing but praise for the German investigation into her case, as well as total belief that the BKA have got it right as far as CB being Madeleine’s abductor is concerned.  What the German court put her through is an absolute disgrace and although the prospect of having to go through a re-trial fills her with understandable dread I do hope the appeal is successful and that the disgusting creep who very obviously raped her is locked up for another 10+ years.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15620 on: March 07, 2025, 06:06:55 PM »
He didn't rape Behan, molest children or expose himself. He was found not guilty based on ALL the FACTS & EVIDENCE. Therefore he is innocent & I'll continue to refer to him as innocent because that's what he is. The McCanns are yet to be proven innocent though.
OJ Simpson was found not guilty of murdering his wife and her boyfriend.  However he was not found innocent, and he WASN’T innocent, that much is as plain as the trollish nose on your face.  Same principle applies in this case, and no amount of your WUMming changes that.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15621 on: March 07, 2025, 06:49:11 PM »
OJ Simpson was found not guilty of murdering his wife and her boyfriend.  However he was not found innocent, and he WASN’T innocent, that much is as plain as the trollish nose on your face.  Same principle applies in this case, and no amount of your WUMming changes that.

I continue to believe OJ was innocent. Mainly because I liked him in The Naked Gun.
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15622 on: March 07, 2025, 06:52:27 PM »
I’ve just watched the whole podcast and I must say she comes across as a fiercely brave and credible person.  She has absolutely no doubt whatsoever the CB raped her and she has nothing but praise for the German investigation into her case, as well as total belief that the BKA have got it right as far as CB being Madeleine’s abductor is concerned.  What the German court put her through is an absolute disgrace and although the prospect of having to go through a re-trial fills her with understandable dread I do hope the appeal is successful and that the disgusting creep who very obviously raped her is locked up for another 10+ years.

Behans conviction that CB was her rapist could well be influenced by her belief that Maddie was abducted by him. The judge was right to take this into account.
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15623 on: March 07, 2025, 06:55:05 PM »
I continue to believe OJ was innocent. Mainly because I liked him in The Naked Gun.
No doubt you believe Fred West was innocent too because he once laid your patio, and that Al Fayed and Savile were two of the kindest loveliest men that ever lived because you enjoy shopping at Harrods and once appeared on Jim’ll Fix It when he fixed it for you to spend the day working in a biscuit factory..

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15624 on: March 07, 2025, 06:59:20 PM »
Behans conviction that CB was her rapist could well be influenced by her belief that Maddie was abducted by him. The judge was right to take this into account.
You’ve got that arse about face.  She was convinced he was her rapist the second she clapped eyes on his photograph.  She says in the interview she naively thought that men who rape women would be unlikely to be interested in little girls.  Far more compelling when she read about him in the paper was the fact that he had a conviction for perpetrating another rape with a similar modus operandi to the one that was inflicted on her.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15625 on: March 07, 2025, 07:08:13 PM »
You’ve got that arse about face.  She was convinced he was her rapist the second she clapped eyes on his photograph.  She says in the interview she naively thought that men who rape women would be unlikely to be interested in little girls.  Far more compelling when she read about him in the paper was the fact that he had a conviction for perpetrating another rape with a similar modus operandi to the one that was inflicted on her.

Behans assailant wore a mask. There's no way she can be certain it was him. The best she can muster is that he had blue eyes. Him & several million other people.
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15626 on: March 07, 2025, 07:26:25 PM »
Behans assailant wore a mask. There's no way she can be certain it was him. The best she can muster is that he had blue eyes. Him & several million other people.
Did you watch the podcast?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15627 on: March 07, 2025, 08:09:28 PM »
Did you watch the podcast?

No. I did try but I'm completely intolerant of Irish accents so I had to give up after the first few seconds I'm afraid.
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Myster

It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline The General

« Last Edit: March 28, 2025, 09:52:47 AM by Eleanor »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.