Well this thread has had a fair bit of interest to day though admittedly most of the posts have been off topic and/or trolling but so far we’ve had only one reason put forward for why abduction is neither plausible nor logical and that was “not enough time “. How much time would therefore be needed to facilitate this theoretical scenario? and is it true that there was virtually no point at all in the 90 minutes available when there wasn’t a member of the Tapas group in or right next to Apartment 5a? I thought these parents were supposedly super neglectful yet the argument seems to be the abduction couldn’t have happeened because they were hovering about the apartment virtually all the time.
There is no evidence regarding means, and the motive is questionable. As to opportunity, it was extremely limited by the reported movements of the group. The neglect, by the way, was ignoring guidelines and leaving small children home alone. Others passing the apartment on their way elsewhere were not checking on the McCann children, but would have hampered a potential abductor.
