Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
hi barrier,
Do you mean something like claiming they have photos of a dead Madeleine, but not letting the parents of the child know that she is dead.
Exactly Its a nonsense.
22
My view is that there's a disconnect from what is claimed and no communication to either OG or the McCanns.
hi barrier,
Do you mean something like claiming they have photos of a dead Madeleine, but not letting the parents of the child know that she is dead.
23
Something new perchance? I've no interest in the McCanns, the programme showed Wendeldt needed help which was known, Brunt doorstepped Leyland ,she took her life, Stallander got a mention which was the only surprise.
Surely by now you know how this works?  If there was anything new it would have been leaked to the press beforehand to get people to watch the programme.  I havent watched the whole of the second episode yet - did they give Stellander an opportunity to divulge his barmy theory?
24
Obviously you cannot cannot control me. In my original post I pointed out that I knew your little game. You want to control people.You ask a question, and if someone replies you keep on demanding answers.
I was taking about something becoming public knowledge, but you changed it to official confirmation. When I  read  Bernt 's book, I knew about the photos. So it was public knowledge then.  Why did neither Bernt nor Friedrich not know something I knew. Obviously, because their meeting was before it was public knowledge. So why are you claiming that it some new revelation and debate it all again.
You sound quite paranoid, like you are afraid to enter into a sensible adult debate with me about something which is obviously quite intrinsic to the case against Bruckner.  The police have never confirmed they have photos and that?s a fact whether you like it or not.  The only revelation that was new to me was that Stellander had been told this by Fulscher, that?s  why I raised it.   A top tip - if you don?t like me raising something on a forum dedicated to this case, then either debate it properly and provide evidence to back up your assertions or jist put me on ignore if you don?t want your beliefs challenged.
25
My view is that there's a disconnect from what is claimed and no communication to either OG or the McCanns.
You have no idea what has been communicated to either OG or the McCanns regarding the evidence that has not been put in the public domain.. 
26
No one forced you.  I don't know what you were expecting?  A full and frank confession from Kate and Gerry perhaps?
Something new perchance? I've no interest in the McCanns, the programme showed Wendeldt needed help which was known, Brunt doorstepped Leyland ,she took her life, Stallander got a mention which was the only surprise.
27
Christ on a bike - as if I have the power to control you.  All I asked for was a cite to confirm your claim that the German police had officially claimed they have photos of dead Madeleine.  You obviously can't provide one because obviously they have never done so and you basically misled the forum. So long and thanks for all the fish.
Obviously you cannot cannot control me. In my original post I pointed out that I knew your little game. You want to control people.You ask a question, and if someone replies you keep on demanding answers.
I was taking about something becoming public knowledge, but you changed it to official confirmation. When I  read  Bernt 's book, I knew about the photos. So it was public knowledge then.  Why did neither Bernt nor Friedrich not know something I knew. Obviously, because their meeting was before it was public knowledge. So why are you claiming that it some new revelation and debate it all again.
28
What is actual in your view?  That Madeleine hasn't come to harm?  Or that the BKA has evidence to the contrary?
My view is that there's a disconnect from what is claimed and no communication to either OG or the McCanns.
29
There was and still is a disconnect between what is claimed and what is actual, the Official find MM page still declares there in no evidence to suggest MM as come to harm.The BKA through OG do not have to provide direct evidence of its exist they merely have to confirm through OG what they have.
What is actual in your view?  That Madeleine hasn't come to harm?  Or that the BKA has evidence to the contrary?
30
Nothing new, that's nigh on two hrs of my life wasted watching it.
No one forced you.  I don't know what you were expecting?  A full and frank confession from Kate and Gerry perhaps?
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10