Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Everything comes to he who waits.

Except charges for Brueckner in relation to Maddie.
That simply isn't going to happen.
3
Mike Naughton
I'm a detective who can at least analyse the evidence and ascertain anomalies. Its what I've been doing for 14 years, miscarriages of justice and offered my assistance in this case numerous times.

[/b]Sandra Lean[/b]
Mike Naughton Yes, but detectives have to be first, analysing the evidence and, secondly, looking for anomalies - they did neither in this case!

Mike Naughton
Sandra Lean as un the Robin Garbutt case, a decision that he was guilty was made and they found the evidence to fit the crime. Ignoring anything which proved his innocence

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02BR6YwVi8XnZi7DDPgDy4LukFrYt66DqTa65UYcQmCMnYsqwbgo8NC5b1RqjMsKpHl&id=1011563515

Michael Naughton of Lewis Legal & False Allegations Forensics Ltd (FAFL)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/17/michael-naughton-of-lewis-legal-false-allegations-forensics-ltd/
4

Maybe it will sink in eventually, but then saying that, if you couldn't work out by yourself that Wolters was bluffing, then perhaps not.
5
That is all I do these days.  Correct blatant misinformation.

I think it is a recognition that it is all over bar the shouting; but however unedifying it just doesn't have the ring to it that "dogs don't lie" etc.  Brueckner has cornered the market and that is a hard one to spin; talk about the desperation they are in if they have to resort to voluntarily adopting the task of "making a silk purse out of a sow's ear" involved in that one.
7
Probably for as long as subtle and not so subtle misinformation is circulated it needs to be corrected.  I must admit though, I am suffering fatigue at the futility of conscience so nakedly and very darkly on display.
For some it was never about putting a missing child centre stage in the effort to recover her and as time passes, that becomes more prosaic.

Last I heard MWT is sticking with woke and wandered.

Yes, MWT has very serious doubts about Kate's curtains & the open window, & frankly, who can blame him. Kate's account of the curtains is both comical & tragic.
8
How many times do we have to repeat this?  Everybody knows it already.

PS.  Any more news from Mark Williams Thomas?  Or has he dropped out again?

How many times does this need repeating. Brueckner doesn’t need an alibi because there is no case against him. Wolters needs to prove Brueckner abducted Maddie, & he can't. So it's Brueckner - winning, three investigative forces - Nil.
9
Probably for as long as subtle and not so subtle misinformation is circulated it needs to be corrected.  I must admit though, I am suffering fatigue at the futility of conscience so nakedly and very darkly on display.
For some it was never about putting a missing child centre stage in the effort to recover her and as time passes, that becomes more prosaic.

Last I heard MWT is sticking with woke and wandered.

That is all I do these days.  Correct blatant misinformation.
10
They have also narrowed down Brueckner's alleged alibi to absolutely zilch in the process 🙄

Which is totally meaningless  because the three investigative forces are unable to prove that Brueckner or anyone else for that matter, abducted Maddie, despite the mass of abduction evidence in their possession.
The onus on Wolters to prove Brueckner guilty, & he can't.
That much is glaringly obvious.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10