Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
It's certainly not wise to rely on what they print.
It’s a feature of conspiracy theorists that they tend to reject any news that appears in the “MSM” as fake, especially any news which doesn’t support their own beliefs.
12
These are the same newspapers that where sued for hundreds of thousands of pounds by the parents themselves for printing false stories.

What was it Mark Rowley himself said :

“ There are odd headlines and odd stories in newspapers on a regular basis and most of those are nonsense.”

It's certainly not wise to rely on what they print.
13
We don't know if the press reports are true though, do we?

These are the same newspapers that where sued for hundreds of thousands of pounds by the parents themselves for printing false stories.

What was it Mark Rowley himself said :

“ There are odd headlines and odd stories in newspapers on a regular basis and most of those are nonsense.”
14
Obviously you did not bother to read Sadie's post building on VS's post quoting the description of the watcher witnessed by many outside the McCann apartment prior to May 3 2007.

At least two of whom have identified the man they witnessed as Brueckner and who knows how many others.

From what we have seen in the press it is obvious that
  • the Portuguese police had Brueckner's photograph in their possession five days after Madeleine's abduction.
  • the Portuguese police knew his name
  • the Portuguese police were actively looking for Brueckner in connection with Madeleine's abduction.[/b]

    So despite Brueckner being firmly on the radar of the Portuguese police it seems he was never found or was actively looked for.

    Why wasn't he?  Somebody, somewhere within the Portuguese judiciary police was interested enough or knew enough about him to include him in the inquiry almost at inception.

When looking for motives I think it would be worthwhile if a thorough investigation was carried out into the early days anomalies such as this very glaring one.  Particularly in relation and conjunction with the latest spate of Amaral lies which once again seeks to knock Brueckner off radar much as he was in 2007.

We don't know if the press reports are true though, do we?
16
You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself, but of course you have no shame as has been evidenced over the many years you’ve been posting false information (aka blatant lies) online.

Says the moral vacuum.

Tidy.
17
Let him sue me then.

That will be tasty.
You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself, but of course you have no shame as has been evidenced over the many years you’ve been posting false information (aka blatant lies) online.
18
You’re a bit of a sleaze for blatantly lying to this forum IMO.  I think actually it’s called libel.

Let him sue me then.

That will be tasty.
19
His poor daughter. Either the evidence she gave is under judicial secrecy but was leaked to the papers by her dad for money….not good or he simply made it up for money…again not good.

What a sleaze.
You’re a bit of a sleaze for blatantly lying to this forum IMO.  I think actually it’s called libel.
20
So you are basically lying when you claim to know for a fact that he invented the claim for cash.  Thought so.

His poor daughter. Either the evidence she gave is under judicial secrecy but was leaked to the papers by her dad for money….not good or he simply made it up for money…again not good.

What a sleaze.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10