Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Prove his daughter identified Brueckner….anything from the horse’s mouth will do.

Well she didn't identify him ftom any photos shown to her when she was interviewed on 9th May.
22
Prove his daughter identified Brueckner….anything from the horse’s mouth will do.
So you are basically lying when you claim to know for a fact that he invented the claim for cash.  Thought so.
23
Furthmore prove he lied about his daughter’s claim.

Prove his daughter identified Brueckner….anything from the horse’s mouth will do.
27
Obviously you did not bother to read Sadie's post building on VS's post quoting the description of the watcher witnessed by many outside the McCann apartment prior to May 3 2007.

At least two of whom have identified the man they witnessed as Brueckner and who knows how many others.

From what we have seen in the press it is obvious that
  • the Portuguese police had Brueckner's photograph in their possession five days after Madeleine's abduction.
  • the Portuguese police knew his name
  • the Portuguese police were actively looking for Brueckner in connection with Madeleine's abduction.

    So despite Brueckner being firmly on the radar of the Portuguese police it seems he was never found or was actively looked for.

    Why wasn't he?  Somebody, somewhere within the Portuguese judiciary police was interested enough or knew enough about him to include him in the inquiry almost at inception.

When looking for motives I think it would be worthwhile if a thorough investigation was carried out into the early days anomalies such as this very glaring one.  Particularly in relation and conjunction with the latest spate of Amaral lies which once again seeks to knock Brueckner off radar much as he was in 2007.

By the same measures OG has had access to the same information regarding Brueckner since 2011 and did absolutely nothing with it until 2017.
28
Tamsin told the police what she saw. No one has any dispute with her.

Her father decided to monetise his daughter’s role in the case. That’s not threatening just rather sleazy.
Do you know this for a fact?  A yes or no answer will suffice.
29
I wonder why there is SUCH a concerted effort to rubbish this woman and her father on this and other forums?  Why do some people apparently feel so threatened by what they have allegedly  said?  It's quite extraordinary!

Tamsin told the police what she saw. No one has any dispute with her.

Her father decided to monetise his daughter’s role in the case. That’s not threatening just rather sleazy.
30
The dog alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as evidence.
Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only alert indications
that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog indicated by forensic laboratory analysis.

https://mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm

Any alert has to be corroborated before presenting it as evidence and that is clearly stated in Grime's report.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10