UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧

How many sock puppet accounts do you lot have?

Was this also you James Easton ?

Seistan Non Serviem
Thank goodness they only "slammed" us. We might have been "blasted" and Sandra could've been called a "boffin."
It doesn't matter one way or the other what the victim's family think. Proximity to the victim doesn't afford privileged insight.
They can't even name the 'journalist' who wrote the piece, let alone the family member. It's pathetic.


or was this James ‘Junior’ Easton ?

AJ Az - Facebook 5th October 2022
Cyclist heard motorbike behind wall
Another prosecution witness who stood at trial, was cyclist LK. He had described initially, hearing a rustling sound as he cycled past the area. By the trial, he was describing a strangling, human sound behind the wall. He also said: “It sounded like a gargling, restriction of someone’s throat." He estimated that the time he was in the area was between 5.05pm and 5.20pm. LK said he was alarmed when he heard the noise but had not stopped because of nerves. The prosecution attempted to use his description to further back up the claimed 5.15pm time of the murder. But – LK also stated: "I said to police in my statement that I heard a motorcycle in the woods on the other side of the wall. It seemed quite far away from the wall.”
What didn’t appear to have been questioned was, if LK had heard the moped while it was still clearly running and while he heard sounds that the prosecution believed could have been the murder taking place – and the other witness had seen the moped leaning against the V break in the wall, after it had ‘cut out’ (5.15pm)...where does that place the moped/moped boys in relation to the time of the murder? They said that they did not see Jodi, but they were in the area at and just after the sounds heard by LK, which were used by the prosecution to back up the time of death.
The appeal documents stated that LK did not see the moped boys, nor he them – suggesting that the moped boys were not in the area at the time of the murder, dismissing their relevance. However, they did not mention that LK heard a motorbike or acknowledge that this was before the bike cut out and was leaning against the wall!
The moped boys had discussed “everything” for the 5 days before going to the police and had lied about the time they were there.
JF & GDs statements largely mentioned Luke – knives, cannabis, weirdness. Their statements didn’t mention themselves until several pages in as they were so focused on Luke.
A pair of “muddy” & “damp” gloves were found in YW’s behind a radiator and reported to the police, both JF & GD said they belonged to them. Initially JF said that he had borrowed the gloves from his brother and that he had stored them in a drawer along with some condoms a knife and his wallet, according to JF the gloves were dry when he put them in the drawer and could not explain how they got damp or why they ended up behind the radiator.
In a statement dated November 26th GD said “The only other thing I remember about gloves is that sometime after the murder, JF said something about his sister YW finding a pair of wet gloves and giving them to the police. He said, 'I don’t know if they’re mine or yours but it’s a bit dodgy'. I don’t know what he meant by that but I wasn’t really bothered."
There was further confusion around what JF was wearing that night. In a statement given on 30th July JF said he had been wearing a blue sweatshirt – in a previous statement he had said he wore a yellow top.
Despite being unable to explain their movements that day at the scene of the crime and the subsequent strange behaviour which was not followed up as a reasonable line of enquiry by the police, JF and GD were still called on to give evidence AGAINST Luke.
The moped was destroyed in the days after the murder and could not be forensically tested.
#statements
#changingstatements
#factsvmedia


 

No Donna - Leonard Kelly first heard a “rustling sound” then the “strangling” sound followed straight after

 

“I said to police in my statement that I heard a motorcycle in the woods on the other side of the wall. It seemed quite far away from the wall” ~ Leonard Kelly

From the BBC - 30th November 2004

“A cyclist has claimed that he heard strangulation noises as he biked up a path near where the body of Midlothian schoolgirl Jodi Jones was found.
Leonard Kelly told the High Court in Edinburgh that he was alarmed and frightened by the noise.

Why didn’t the BBC report on the other witnesses who gave evidence in support of Leonard Kelly’s evidence?

AJ Az aka Ana Justice🙄
James Easton None. Even if it could be said that it's odd, that he may seemingly have been wearing a green shirt, even though we've been told that he had been wearing a green bomber jacket all day - this witness saw Luke (around 6pm) after the time Police believe the murder occurred (5.15pm). There was no mention of any blood stains, so, why would there have been a need to dispose of it?

Did Andrew Holburn see killer Luke Mitchell at “around 6pm” or was the time nearer to around 5:45-5:50pm at stated back in 2010?

Timeline of Events

5.30pm Luke leaves the house and walks to the end of the street
5.32pm Luke calls Jodis house, but the line is engaged
5.40pm Luke calls the house again this time Alan Ovens answers. He says he
told Luke Jodi had left to meet him. Luke doesnt remember exactly what was said.
5.40pm Judy and Alan leave the house to go to the cemetery immediately
following the phone call from Luke (therefore Joseph now has no alibi)
5.45 5.50 Three schoolboys see Luke sitting on a wall at the end of his street (they passed him twice, as one of them got a puncture in his bike tyre, and they had to double back.)
5.50 6.05 6 witnesses say they saw a youth hanging around on the Newbattle Road, between the end of Lukes street, and the entrance to the path (although none of them claims to have seen him at the entrance itself.) Luke says he wandered up the street a little way to Barondale Cottages, which is approximately halfway between the end of his street and the entrance to the path, to see if he could see Jodi coming. He told the police this before these witnesses came forward.
6.50-6.55pm Luke phones some male friends to see what they are doing, as Jodi still hasnt shown
7pm Luke phones his mother to tell her if Jodi comes to the house, he is in The Abbey, and to tell Jodi to come there..

Dean Houston, Grant Elliott and Andrew Holburn could have seen killer Luke Mitchell at around 5:40pm when he phoned and spoke to Allen Ovens

To Shane, perhaps? Or Corinne?

Why would he be phoning his mother Corinne Mitchell if (according to his nonsense) he had only just left her?

It was Grant Elliott who cycled back after getting a puncture in his tyre, so the productions relating to killer Luke Mitchell’s mobile telephone records should make it clear what time exactly the 3 youths saw him and who he phoned

How many sock puppet accounts do you lot have?

Does Seistan Non Serviem lead back to you lot too? 

This was posted under your 6th May 2023 Facebook post James Easton

Seistan Non Serviem
It's just the heavy metal way of saying 'F__k the mainstream.' The punks were more political about it but it is sad that they succeeded in using this to impugn Luke's character and it should have been robustly defended. My hymn book had a pentagram, 666 and an inverted cross on it. We don't live in Iran or Saudi...
But in the court of public opinion, it's an easy smear.
I was disappointed that Luke regretted getting a copy of the Satanic Bible when in prison, because he wanted to find out what it was that he was supposed to be. It's a perfectly legal book FFS! If you read it, you'll discover that Satanists don't believe in the devil, let alone worship him. Most are atheists and the term 'satanist' serves a similar two fingered attitude to them as it does for metal fans and punks.
The worst thing really is that he was into really lame and tame mainstream shock rock. There's some seriously miserable, misanthropic stuff out there which I admit I wouldn't like my teenage son getting into but that's neither here nor there. This was a modern day witch trial plain and simple. Don't be different is the message.

Seistan Non Serviem
Heather Brunt Judas Priest and Rammstein were actually taken to court (they won) for inspiring murder and suicide. Fred West was apparently into Disney films. I know which one would set me off first! But yes, they are trying to frame their target as an 'outsider.'
Having read both The Satanic Bible and The Satanic Scriptures (easy reads BTW) what fascinates me is how many powerful people in our society seem to adhere to it's egoistic and selfish code. Luke was not one of them. He just liked to rock.

AJ Az
"On 14th April 2004, at the time of his arrest, the crown office had issued guidance to newspaper editors confirming that Luke Mitchell had been charged with Jodi Jones' murder and was to appear in court the next day. Although he had been previously named, for the period after the arrest the majority of newspapers reported that 'a boy' had been arrested in relation to Jodi's murder, the Press and Journal fully named the then 15 year old boy.
The company (not the editor) Aberdeen Journals, was charged with a s.47 offence for breaching the Criminal Procedure Scotland Act 1995, which bans the publication of details that would lead to the identification of anyone under the age of 16 involved in criminal proceedings before a court.
The crown argued that proceedings were active when the article was published and that a warrant had been granted for Mitchells arrest on the 7th April, so should not have been named from this point onwards. The Newspaper argued that because Luke Mitchell had not yet appeared in court, 'what was published was not a report of any proceeding in court'.
Due to the strict wording of s.47 the sheriff concluded 'Although it might be thought that what did appear might be regarded as an attempt to circumvent the provisions of s.47, I believe that the correct approach to the matter was to strictly construe this section and when I do that I simply have no difficulty in concluding that what appeared in the newspaper in the day in question did not amount to a breach of s.47'."


Under which AJ Az aka Ana Azaria aka Ana Justice aka Donna Dee aka ILove Steak aka Boy C McC 🙄 stated;


AJ Az
Debz Tay Hi Debz, would you be able to edit the swear? It just stops trolls from being able to report the group - thanks :) We did have a post with info about Luke being named - will see if I can find it for you!

AJ Az
Debz Tay No problem at all Debz, you didn't do anything wrong - it's just frustrating that we need to be careful. There's a lot of trolls out there who will use what they can. And yep, there are so many things like this in Luke's case, where they just bent the rules. It's shocking!


I bet the police would have a field day with all your devices