Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance.

[Captain Cringe]

That’s the thing…you don’t know that I’m lying…you have no idea who I have connections with. You simply assume I’m lying because it suits your agenda.

Now back to the point….did Tamsin Silence ever identify Brueckner as the man she saw supposedly hanging around the parent’s apartment….the answer to that is a categorical no.

Not according to her father who you presume is lying because it suits YOUR agenda.  How can you state something as categoric when you have no access to the current investigation, unless you're going to pretend that you do, just for effect?

[faithlilly]

Not according to her father who you presume is lying because it suits YOUR agenda.  How can you state something as categoric when you have no access to the current investigation, unless you're going to pretend that you do, just for effect?

I have never pretended that I have any access to the current investigation so I’m not sure what you’re talking about there. What I have said is that Tasmin’s dad was paid for his story though to be honest the story could have been written without Mr Silence’s input. NOWHERE does it say that Tamsin recognised Brueckner, the ‘claim’ is ambiguous

“Gordon Sillence, 61, said his girl Tasmin, then 11, twice saw a man who looked like Christian B lurking outside the McCanns’ flat.”

Is it the churnalist who thinks the individual described by Tamsin looked like Brueckner? We have no way of knowing.

Further did Silence really say this

“ She even saw a little girl, believed to be Madeleine, on the balcony being watched by the prowler.”

Because even Tamsin didn’t claim that.

To be honest I don’t think necessarily that Silence approached the Sun, the piece is so factually inaccurate it’s obviously been written by someone who knows little of the case. I do however think that Silence senior let his name be used to give the piece substance…but for a price.

Hope that clears things up.

You do seem to be taking this rather personally….best not, it’s only a forum.

[kizzy]

Madeleine's case is not frozen in aspic.  Lots of fresh evidence.  At least one brand new arguido.  And the information that Amaral gave us about the time the PJ did a trick with Brueckner of "now you see him ... now you don't" on his watch.

I'm rather intrigued what Amaral's motive is for that period when he was coordinator as I watch his strenuous efforts to fail the case yet again and why the "questioners" are not asking questions about that peculiar behaviour.

why the "questioners" are not asking questions about that peculiar behaviour.

I would think that question should be more directed to the mccs.

[Brietta]

why the "questioners" are not asking questions about that peculiar behaviour.

I would think that question should be more directed to the mccs.

Yes ~ I know you do.

But the guys and gals who know how to conduct criminal investigations are at variance with you.  They have this cute little trick of studying all the available evidence with two purposes in mind

• to rule people out of investigations, saves a lot of time and repetitive ground hog daying
• to rule people into investigations allowing a relevant direction for seeking evidence and gathering enough evidence to make a case, which can be presented in court

That's what real investigators do in the belief that is how crimes are solved.

Amaral uses a different technique which has been truly quite bizarre of late.  You might have no interest in mulling that over, but I am certain that I won't be alone in wondering what his motive is.

PS your chosen target which you share with Amaral - was ruled out of the equation many years ago.

[kizzy]

Yes ~ I know you do.

But the guys and gals who know how to conduct criminal investigations are at variance with you.  They have this cute little trick of studying all the available evidence with two purposes in mind

• to rule people out of investigations, saves a lot of time and repetitive ground hog daying
• to rule people into investigations allowing a relevant direction for seeking evidence and gathering enough evidence to make a case, which can be presented in court

That's what real investigators do in the belief that is how crimes are solved.

Amaral uses a different technique which has been truly quite bizarre of late.  You might have no interest in mulling that over, but I am certain that I won't be alone in wondering what his motive is.

I am certain that I won't be alone in wondering what his motive is.

Seems I wont be alone either ....wondering what the mccs motive was.

[Captain Cringe]

I have never pretended that I have any access to the current investigation so I’m not sure what you’re talking about there. What I have said is that Tasmin’s dad was paid for his story though to be honest the story could have been written without Mr Silence’s input. NOWHERE does it say that Tamsin recognised Brueckner, the ‘claim’ is ambiguous

“Gordon Sillence, 61, said his girl Tasmin, then 11, twice saw a man who looked like Christian B lurking outside the McCanns’ flat.”

Is it the churnalist who thinks the individual described by Tamsin looked like Brueckner? We have no way of knowing.

Further did Silence really say this

“ She even saw a little girl, believed to be Madeleine, on the balcony being watched by the prowler.”

Because even Tamsin didn’t claim that.

To be honest I don’t think necessarily that Silence approached the Sun, the piece is so factually inaccurate it’s obviously been written by someone who knows little of the case. I do however think that Silence senior let his name be used to give the piece substance…but for a price.

Hope that clears things up.

You do seem to be taking this rather personally….best not, it’s only a forum.

Thanks for finally admitting you lied when you said you knew he’d been paid by the paper.  Always best to stick to the truth (which in this case is you don’t know) if you don’t want to look like a complete eejit.

[faithlilly]

Thanks for finally admitting you lied when you said you knew he’d been paid by the paper.  Always best to stick to the truth (which in this case is you don’t know) if you don’t want to look like a complete eejit.

It’s such a lovely autumn day outside….perhaps you should take advantage, clear your head?

[Captain Cringe]

It’s such a lovely autumn day outside….perhaps you should take advantage, clear your head?

More veiled insults, a Faithlilly speciality.  Let the next thing you write be kind, reflective and insightful.  Now there’s a challenge!

[faithlilly]

More veiled insults, a Faithlilly speciality.  Let the next thing you write be kind, reflective and insightful.  Now there’s a challenge!

You see malice where none was intended.

[Captain Cringe]

You see malice where none was intended.

Oh please.  Run off and bother someone else for a change.

[faithlilly]

Oh please.  Run off and bother someone else for a change.

Would it make you feel better if I put you on ignore again?

[Lace]

I have never pretended that I have any access to the current investigation so I’m not sure what you’re talking about there. What I have said is that Tasmin’s dad was paid for his story though to be honest the story could have been written without Mr Silence’s input. NOWHERE does it say that Tamsin recognised Brueckner, the ‘claim’ is ambiguous

“Gordon Sillence, 61, said his girl Tasmin, then 11, twice saw a man who looked like Christian B lurking outside the McCanns’ flat.”

Is it the churnalist who thinks the individual described by Tamsin looked like Brueckner? We have no way of knowing.

Further did Silence really say this

“ She even saw a little girl, believed to be Madeleine, on the balcony being watched by the prowler.”

Because even Tamsin didn’t claim that.

To be honest I don’t think necessarily that Silence approached the Sun, the piece is so factually inaccurate it’s obviously been written by someone who knows little of the case. I do however think that Silence senior let his name be used to give the piece substance…but for a price.

Hope that clears things up.

You do seem to be taking this rather personally….best not, it’s only a forum.

Taken from the statement given by Tamsin Silence-

When asked she says that she saw Madeleine once, on a day that she cannot indicate, on the balcony where the man was staring at, the first time. She even waved at her because it was a small child, in a caring gesture.

[faithlilly]

Taken from the statement given by Tamsin Silence-

When asked she says that she saw Madeleine once, on a day that she cannot indicate, on the balcony where the man was staring at, the first time. She even waved at her because it was a small child, in a caring gesture.

Yes thank you Lace I know that Tasmin saw Madeleine but not at the same time as her sighting as claimed in the quote I posted.

[Captain Cringe]

Would it make you feel better if I put you on ignore again?

No, just give it a rest for a bit, you wear me out.