Gerry Mccann a freemason?

[faithlilly]

The penny appears to have finally dropped.   It is the case not the parents that appear to have received what you term as "preferential treatment".   Yes, in an ideal world where every single person was treated equally every single case of a missing child would have equal amounts of time, money and resources afforded to them but you would have to be hopelessly naive to believe that is ever going to be the case.  Ben Needham's case had far more time, cash and resources thrown at it than many other cases of missing children both here and elsewhere in the world, so should we complain about that too?  IMO obsessing about the perceived unfairness of the Madeleine investigation is petty and pointless.  Instead, pick a case you feel very strongly about, get behind it, contact the parents, start a campaign to get behind a review of their missing child's case, it would be more productive than spending time and energy whingeing about this case.  The money has been spent, time to get over it.

I remember the wailing and gnashing of teeth from some when there was the perception that Madeleine’s parents weren’t getting the help and support that they deserved. Some have short memories.

[Venturi Swirl]

I remember the wailing and gnashing of teeth from some when there was the perception that Madeleine’s parents weren’t getting the help and support that they deserved. Some have short memories.

Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing now, about all the other missing children cases that you believe have been hard done by?  There’s nothing wrong with advocating for more help for a particular case, but there is something a bit “off” bemoaning the fact that more help has actually been granted in this case.  Would you rather the McCann case had remained shelved since 2008?  I rather think that would have suited you better….

[Eleanor]

I thought it was something to do with a British Passport and the right to protection while abroad.  And the decidedly iffy approach of The PJ to missing children.

Madeleine was only in Portugal for five days before she vanished.  And before you knew it The Portuguese Media was leaking all sorts of rubbish, followed by The British Media.  This did set a precedent.

Although I have no idea who started The Free Mason lark, but I do remember it from a very long time ago.

[Brietta]

The penny appears to have finally dropped.   It is the case not the parents that appear to have received what you term as "preferential treatment".   Yes, in an ideal world where every single person was treated equally every single case of a missing child would have equal amounts of time, money and resources afforded to them but you would have to be hopelessly naive to believe that is ever going to be the case.  Ben Needham's case had far more time, cash and resources thrown at it than many other cases of missing children both here and elsewhere in the world, so should we complain about that too?  IMO obsessing about the perceived unfairness of the Madeleine investigation is petty and pointless.  Instead, pick a case you feel very strongly about, get behind it, contact the parents, start a campaign to get behind a review of their missing child's case, it would be more productive than spending time and energy whingeing about this case.  The money has been spent, time to get over it.

The point has been made about the appropriateness of working the case of a missing child as long as there is evidence which makes continuation viable.

Investigators were not looking for Madeleine McCann for much of the fourteen months nominally allotted to her case which is just so wrong on so many levels - particularly morally.

The McCanns sheer perseverance won a review of her case for her.

Evidence led to her case being opened.

Evidence allowed her case to remain open over the years of bitching by some about the cost.

Freemasonry has absolutely nothing at all to do with it - the evidence ignored throughout the years by the Portuguese did that - and it is the continuance of developing that evidence that has kept it going.

What is it that drives the propaganda push against paying for an active police investigation into the case of a missing child for as long as there is supporting evidence?

Those seemingly advocating the release of a prime suspect on the say-so of a corrupt cop - and those advocating cutting off the funding to finish off investigating a case still with very active evidence to be dealt with - on the say-so of internet trolls is definitely the most morally bankrupt notion I have ever heard of.

[Eleanor]

Amaral was about to be made an Arguido himself in the case of Torture against the mother of another missing child.  A crime of Perjury of which he was convicted.  Although we didn't know this at the time.  But The PJ did.  After that it all descended into any old accusation will do including Free Masonry.

The whole thing was an appalling mess during which the state of The PJ became all too apparent and riddled with corruption.  I doubt that Portugal will ever fully recover.  But someone had to try to sort this out.  And Madeleine McCann was and still is the responsibility of Britain.

There hasn't been a similar case in my living memory.

[Brietta]

Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing now, about all the other missing children cases that you believe have been hard done by?  There’s nothing wrong with advocating for more help for a particular case, but there is something a bit “off” bemoaning the fact that more help has actually been granted IMO.  Would you rather the McCann case had remained shelved since 2008?  I rather think that would have suited you better….

I think there are those who could not make it any clearer that is precisely what would have suited them better.

I think normal practice for police investigations into missing children is that they are either solved or they fizzle out as the supporting evidence never appears or the evidence runs out without allowing a conclusion to be reached.

But they remain viable and are subject to review periodically with fresh eyes.

The disgusting aspect of the complainers obstructing all initiatives made in Madeleine McCann's case, is the determined resistance against solving what happened in the face of fresh evidence allowing her case to be opened and the continuation of the active case allowing even more evidence to accrue.

This is not a campaign against a cold case.

This is organised resistance against a live police investigation designed to solve what happened to a missing child.

As such - why the complaining?

[Venturi Swirl]

I’m guessing that for the likes of Faithliilly and her ilk no amount of taxpayers’ money would have been too much had the investigation continued to have been targeted at the parents.

[Eleanor]

I’m guessing that for the likes of Faithliilly and her ilk no amount of taxpayers’ money would have been too much had the investigation continued to have been targeted at the parents.

Not much doubt about that.

[faithlilly]

I’m guessing that for the likes of Faithliilly and her ilk no amount of taxpayers’ money would have been too much had the investigation continued to have been targeted at the parents.

I think you’re under the misapprehension that I’m unhappy with the amount of money spent on OG rather than the imbalance in funding compared to other, similar cases. The point is that all missing children deserve as well funded an investigation as Madeleine not that she deserves less of one.

I hope that’s clear now.

[Venturi Swirl]

I think you’re under the misapprehension that I’m unhappy with the amount of money spent on OG rather than the imbalance in funding compared to other, similar cases. The point is that all missing children deserve as well funded an investigation as Madeleine not that she deserves less of one.

I hope that’s clear now.

Jolly good, I am very glad to hear that you are happy with the amount of money spent on trying to bring Madeleine’s abductor to justice. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Jolly good, I am very glad to hear that you are happy with the amount of money spent on trying to bring Madeleine’s abductor to justice.

Not going well is it.

[faithlilly]

Jolly good, I am very glad to hear that you are happy with the amount of money spent on trying to bring Madeleine’s abductor to justice.

Oh has he been found then?

[sadie]

Oh has he been found then?

We will have to wait and see.

One thing is certain and that is that OG have somethng keeping them investigating  and it doesn't seem to be the same as The Germans and The Portuguese.

They  are looking for a dead Madeleine or conclusive proof.

OG are looking for a MISSING Madeleine.   A mighty dfference.


Psychic Matt James also thinks that Madeleine is still alive.  He says that the worlds top psychics all believe Madeleine to be alive.   Even though Matt talked about further runes, it is strange how his Runes on the subject were suddenly stopped on April 26th 2022.   Who is hiding them and why?

 
They confirm the man who I suspect and also the reason Madeleine was taken in my investigation.  It is all about bloodlines, Power and family self agrandisment IMO.   One of the runes showed Madeleine with a tiny crown above her head, but that has vanished along with other runes.


When items /facts / pointers on the internet vanish or become altered by the perps. one KNOWS that one has found an important fact.   That it had to be got rid of , or alternatively vanished.   

The computer wizards and whiz kids are so clever.   

[Venturi Swirl]

Oh has he been found then?

Quite possibly, we shall know one way or the other in the fullness of time.  Meanwhile  I know you would favour an outcome which meant that all that money had been channeled correctly, resulting in justice for Madeleine, the evil predator put behind bars and thus keeping other children safe from befalling a similar fate to hers.  Wouldn’t you?

[sadie]

Quite possibly, we shall know one way or the other in the fullness of time.  Meanwhile  I know you would favour an outcome which meant that all that money had been channeled correctly, resulting in justice for Madeleine, the evil predator put behind bars and thus keeping other children safe from befalling a similar fate to hers.  Wouldn’t you?

IMO, OG will keep going as long as there is info to be investigared, meaning quietly investigating people.

This the the main reason why it is costing more .... loads of info and quite a few people.   The people mainly being the upper echelons of society, so more difficult to bring down.



Plus i remain convinced that they are looking at global trafficking.


Some major event needs to happen before they move , also IMO