Hello Holly. I am trying to find proof of innocence or guilt and thought hypnosis may help. It is going to be very difficult for Jeremy due to so much evidence being destroyed. Another thing concerns me. Jeremy claims to have climbed through the window to collect his passport during September. However CAL states in her book that during that entire week Jeremy was in London under police surveillance. Can she provide documents to back this up?
I think proof of innocence or guilt can be found by today's science and technology. What was available at the time of the investigation/JB's trial is radically different compared with now.
- Ballistics testing on rifle/ammo with silencer to determine whether 'draw-back' is possible.
- Analyse blood using conventional serology: antigens, enzymes and protein after subjecting to the same conditions as the 'flake' underwent: firing of rifle/hot gases and ambient temperature over 5 weeks
- Test whether females long polished finger nails are able to prepare rifle for fire and fire 25 rounds without causing damage to nails and polish.
- Test how many times novices need to observe an experienced handler prepare the weapon for fire before they are able to accomplish.
- Complete tests on the scratch marks found on the aga. As I understand it the CCRC rejected Peter Sutherst's evidence based on another expert (Andy Law off the top of my head) criticising his methods rather than the conclusion.
- Review of SoC using crime scene photos enhanced by modern technology eg location of casings to determine who was shot where exactly.
- Review of pathological evidence with particular emphasis on the wounds NB sustained upstairs to determine whether or not he was capable of entering into a violent struggle downstairs.
- Review of June and SC's psychiatric histories based on experts using modern psychiatry/psychology and neuroscience.
- Test bullets used and compare any chemical deposits left on hands; it appears bullets tested for trial compared with SC's hand swabs were different from the actual bullets used.
Only the above can assist JB. He is not entitled to legal aid and I see no evidence of JB or his campaign team fund raising. IMO poring over case docs is not the way forward. If there's anything incriminating for the prosecution it will surely be long gone ie destroyed not held under PII? Paperwork that gives the appearance of assisting the defence eg call from NB to EP will simply be written off by CCRC.
Can you think of any tests?
Much of what we discuss on the forums and is presented in the media is irrelevant. Only new evidence that is measurable by established branches of science can assist JB now.
I'll come back to you later re the other points.
