Shall we have the point again? - It is not about washing clean, it is about washing over the point. It is not about the tactics being accepted, the lies and manipulation to illicit whatever response, and in this instance there are several at play to evoke. One being, to add whatever else to the creation of monsters, guns, dynamite, more limbs - The more that is added to the monsters, only serves to show how strong the evidence against Mitchell was, and not its weakness. That these many others investigated were eliminated, but not Mitchell.
Now we deal with investigated, which is very much the point around tactics, the deception and the manipulation. For in that point, there is that it is all tactical, with the only intent to deceive. The liars, the manipulators who do it at will, are the very ones telling you that no other person was investigated, that is the point - Spinning a yarn. That when a murder happens, and as highlighted, many of the public contact the police, some valid and some "crazies" Which and again around the monsters, only serves to show what was investigated and eliminated at the time.
Now we place these many others that have suspect applied to them, by the liars, the manipulators who do this with ease. They are not suspects, they are people who were caught up in some young girl being murdered. Who at the point of all being suspect, were investigated and eliminated. They are now only applied as imaginary suspects, by the people who have spun a yarn, the very people, who with such ease, can and do lie and manipulate at will with their tactics.
You are told there was no evidence, by the people who are spinning a yarn, the very people who you boast are getting response around tactics used, when the yarn in itself is a tactic. From the people who do it across the board, the liars and manipulators who are spinning a yarn.
This case built upon evidence where a substantial amount came from a compulsive liar/s- Who attempted to spin a yarn themselves. In turn to be heard, to have a voice, needs like minded people, kindred spirits, to spin that yarn on repeat. What people do do, when they see a lie, another, then another, is they place one mighty big ? around everything, starting right from those three words "I am innocent"
It is not "Why would I lie to risk a dangerous killer back on our streets?" It poses no risk at all. It is, why do you? A brief example, 2003 and Mitchell spun a yarn to the local mouthpiece (her description, not mines). The 'rushing up a path' - Access gained to defence papers and saw without any doubt those lies, that is not up for debate. So, one changed the narrative more to spin further yarn, to cover the lies on repeat from Mitchell ---------- Having spent years putting out a false narrative, one without doubt sought only to back that, by using whatever to keep that spinning going.
That direction of the Judge around accepting a strong majority saw the Jury return in no time. Because people are spun a yarn they live under an illusion, that had there been insufficient evidence in law to convict equates to Mitchell not having killed Jodi Jones - Not true in the slightest, the truth is a far cry from the yarn spun. He would have become (like thousands more) a statistic of an offender getting off. The factually guilty walking free.
