Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 69099 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Davel

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #30 on: September 11, 2020, 08:47:37 PM »
OK it is Kizzy's choice, so drop the goading.

kizzy is of course entitled to her view but shes not entitled to say that posters such as myself beleive things because we are told to....I believe what I do based on the evidence

Offline Davel

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #31 on: September 11, 2020, 08:57:19 PM »
if i believed as many sceptics seem to that..

That the dogs proved that Maddie body had been in 5a

That the dna proved maddie died in the apartmnet and was carried in the car...but perhaps the FFs doctored it

That the McCanns lied in their statements

That the McCcanns behaviour was odd and that statemnet analysis proves they were lying

That the McCanns started the fund to make themselves rich

That gerry discussed the abuse of his daughter in front of the Gaspars


If those  things were true I too would believe the mcCanns guilty and amaral right....but I dont believe any of them

« Last Edit: September 11, 2020, 09:07:25 PM by Davel »

Offline Robittybob1

  • Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 25049
  • Total likes: 4299
  • Wisdom and understanding please.
    • The Lord Jesus - search for Madeleine McCann
Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #32 on: September 11, 2020, 09:40:38 PM »
I was not goading, I was making a perfectly valid observation.
OK tone down your perfectly valid observations then please.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #33 on: September 11, 2020, 09:45:51 PM »
OK tone down your perfectly valid observations then please.
LOL, OK Boss.

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #34 on: September 12, 2020, 05:02:30 PM »
OK tone down your perfectly valid observations then please.
About time too.
Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #35 on: September 13, 2020, 10:11:57 AM »
if i believed as many sceptics seem to that..

That the dogs proved that Maddie body had been in 5a

That the dna proved maddie died in the apartmnet and was carried in the car...but perhaps the FFs doctored it

That the McCanns lied in their statements

That the McCcanns behaviour was odd and that statemnet analysis proves they were lying

That the McCanns started the fund to make themselves rich

That gerry discussed the abuse of his daughter in front of the Gaspars


If those  things were true I too would believe the mcCanns guilty and amaral right....but I dont believe any of them

CB evidence. a phone ping in area he lived in -  dodgy ex con friend who he told he knew what happened to Maddie.[this makes him prime suspectin abducting Maddie even though not proof of abduction]

Nothing with the mccs is straight forward every thing seems too have a twist.

DNA FIRST 100% match then it wasnt.

Two OF THE Best trained sniffer dogs in UK  -  both got it wrong. If Maddie had been found within a few days M G career would have been it tatters.

Car boot left open of car


Contradictions between the account of Jeremy Wilkins and the accounts of gmcc and Jane Tanner.IIRC JWdid not appear in documentry.

Metodo three it seems was only employed to dish dirt on GA. they also turned oit sleazy P.I

why did the mccs spend fund money on hiring these detectives?

I believe it has only seemed more about gagging GA than looking for Maddie. 


Detectives Hired by the McCanns want to Frame Gonçalo Amaral

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/02/detectives-hired-by-mccanns-want-to.html
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline Davel

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #36 on: September 13, 2020, 10:41:37 AM »
CB evidence. a phone ping in area he lived in -  dodgy ex con friend who he told he knew what happened to Maddie.[this makes him prime suspectin abducting Maddie even though not proof of abduction]

Nothing with the mccs is straight forward every thing seems too have a twist.

DNA FIRST 100% match then it wasnt.

Two OF THE Best trained sniffer dogs in UK  -  both got it wrong. If Maddie had been found within a few days M G career would have been it tatters.

Car boot left open of car


Contradictions between the account of Jeremy Wilkins and the accounts of gmcc and Jane Tanner.IIRC JWdid not appear in documentry.

Metodo three it seems was only employed to dish dirt on GA. they also turned oit sleazy P.I

why did the mccs spend fund money on hiring these detectives?

I believe it has only seemed more about gagging GA than looking for Maddie. 


Detectives Hired by the McCanns want to Frame Gonçalo Amaral

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/02/detectives-hired-by-mccanns-want-to.html

there never was a 100% dna match..lets have a cite for that first...Ill get to the rest of your claims after that
« Last Edit: September 13, 2020, 10:46:56 AM by Davel »

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #37 on: September 13, 2020, 11:11:18 AM »
there never was a 100% dna match..lets have a cite for that first...Ill get to the rest of your claims after that

Full match same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3HQ74Rfdbk
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline Davel

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #38 on: September 13, 2020, 11:22:49 AM »
Full match same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3HQ74Rfdbk

But it wasn't true... It was lies

A, report by a journalist does not make it a fact
« Last Edit: September 13, 2020, 11:30:42 AM by Davel »

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #39 on: September 13, 2020, 11:33:38 AM »
But it wasn't true... It was lies

A, report by a journalist does not make it a fact

Yet a report saying the new suspect's lawyer met Amaral is held to be true.

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #40 on: September 13, 2020, 11:40:36 AM »
But it wasn't true... It was lies

A, report by a journalist does not make it a fact

Nothing is true were your concerend so you have no relevence to me.

You dont know what happened Fact - no proof of abduction Fact.




the only people who insist that Maddie was abducted by a paedophile are the – the mccs
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #41 on: September 13, 2020, 11:55:34 AM »
"Nothing is true" - wow, deep or what.

Offline Davel

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #42 on: September 13, 2020, 11:57:09 AM »
Nothing is true were your concerend so you have no relevence to me.

You dont know what happened Fact - no proof of abduction Fact.




the only people who insist that Maddie was abducted by a paedophile are the – the mccs

No I and many others think she was abducted by a paedophile... As does HCW

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #43 on: September 13, 2020, 12:43:25 PM »
No I and many others think she was abducted by a paedophile... As does HCW

HCW has admitted he hasnt got anything substantial

Maddie is classed as a missing child....think you would have the totally opposite respect for him if it was the mccs he was investigating.

Imo you just go with the flow as ling as it isnt the mccs
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #44 on: September 13, 2020, 12:46:16 PM »
No I and many others think she was abducted by a paedophile... As does HCW

I think that there is little doubt that Madeleine was stranger abducted.

As for Christian B, it seems quite probable that he is involved, but at present, I sit on the wall, think about it and produce likely scenarios … which almost everyone ignores. @)(++(*