Author Topic: How can the Mccanns be 100% innocent - when they haven't been 100% been cleared.  (Read 5745 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

When it seems some posters think what happened on the night of the 3/05/2007 is historical.

Also the mccs have been completely ruled out and the only way forward now is concentrating on the German suspect.



Imo nothing has changed since that night evidence wise apart from a long line of so called suspects that come to nothing.

There is still no evidence the Maddie was abducted from her bed.

sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline Vertigo Swirl

And there is no evidence that the McCanns hid her body so that's that then.

Offline kizzy

And there is no evidence that the McCanns hid her body so that's that then.

There is no evidence that anyone else did either.
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline G-Unit

When it seems some posters think what happened on the night of the 3/05/2007 is historical.

Also the mccs have been completely ruled out and the only way forward now is concentrating on the German suspect.

Imo nothing has changed since that night evidence wise apart from a long line of so called suspects that come to nothing.

There is still no evidence the Maddie was abducted from her bed.

Stranger abduction was a theory which became a 'fact', despite the lack of evidence. In my opinion one of the reasons it became a 'fact' was constant repetition.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth#:~:text=%E2%80%9CRepeat%20a%20lie%20often%20enough,%22illusion%20of%20truth%22%20effect.




England - good effort

Offline kizzy

Nothing it seems was ever straight forward.

The mccs said an abduction took place - even though no evidence of one apart from there say so.

IMO inconsistency's were ignored any one who dared contradict there version were either sued or got rid of.
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Online Eleanor

Nothing it seems was ever straight forward.

The mccs said an abduction took place - even though no evidence of one apart from there say so.

IMO inconsistency's were ignored any one who dared contradict there version were either sued or got rid of.

This is bordering on Libel.  Please don't do this.

Offline Davel

Nothing it seems was ever straight forward.

The mccs said an abduction took place - even though no evidence of one apart from there say so.

IMO inconsistency's were ignored any one who dared contradict there version were either sued or got rid of.

There is so much wrong with your post that is for the most part wrong...or misinformed.

I dont know any poster who has calimed the McCAnns are 100% innocent...that is impossible for anyone to determine at the moment.

I dont know any poster who has claimed abduction as a fact...my opinion is that its the most likely at the moment.

As regards evidence of abduction...you claim there is none...how can you possibly know that.

From everything HCW has said I think he has almost proof of abduction....but not proof it was CB who was responsible

Offline Wonderfulspam



I seem to remember a big lipped body language 'expert' telling ITV viewers the McCanns were 100% innocent.

Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Stranger abduction was a theory which became a 'fact', despite the lack of evidence. In my opinion one of the reasons it became a 'fact' was constant repetition.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth#:~:text=%E2%80%9CRepeat%20a%20lie%20often%20enough,%22illusion%20of%20truth%22%20effect.
Who exactly are you accusing of repeatedly lying in order to make stranger abduction a fact?

Offline Brietta

This is bordering on Libel.  Please don't do this.
It is also a load of ill informed opinionated nonsense particularly when cognisance of current affairs is fed into the equation.
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Brietta

Stranger abduction was a theory which became a 'fact', despite the lack of evidence. In my opinion one of the reasons it became a 'fact' was constant repetition.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth#:~:text=%E2%80%9CRepeat%20a%20lie%20often%20enough,%22illusion%20of%20truth%22%20effect.

Stranger abduction was a theory which was discarded according to Amaral who confirms that Christian Brueckner was visited by the Judicial Police along with others of his ilk in preference for Amaral's Calpol led imaginings as he indulged his performance of "Cipriano the sequel".
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline barrier

Stranger abduction was a theory which was discarded according to Amaral who confirms that Christian Brueckner was visited by the Judicial Police along with others of his ilk in preference for Amaral's Calpol led imaginings as he indulged his performance of "Cipriano the sequel".

Fill's a space one supposes.

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline kizzy

There is so much wrong with your post that is for the most part wrong...or misinformed.

I dont know any poster who has calimed the McCAnns are 100% innocent...that is impossible for anyone to determine at the moment.

I dont know any poster who has claimed abduction as a fact...my opinion is that its the most likely at the moment.

As regards evidence of abduction...you claim there is none...how can you possibly know that.

From everything HCW has said I think he has almost proof of abduction....but not proof it was CB who was responsible

Its only what you think though D - how can you possibly know that Wolt has evidence of an abduction.

Again only words.
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline G-Unit

Who exactly are you accusing of repeatedly lying in order to make stranger abduction a fact?

Sharing a theory isn't lying, neither is repeating it.
England - good effort

Offline Davel

Its only what you think though D - how can you possibly know that Wolt has evidence of an abduction.

Again only words.


I can make avery good inference based on everything he has said and the situation as a whole.  To me everything he has said fits together perfectly...we will have to wait and see who is right...Im confident