Why is it necessary to have a theory? I don't know what happened on 3rd May 2007 and in my opinion the legal summary was correct to say it wasn't possible, based on the evidence in the PJ files, to identify the crime. There was enough evidence, however, to say that the T9's stories were contradictory and that their timeline needed to be examined more closely. That's why I can't subscribe to their theory of stranger abduction, because it relies solely on their opinions and testimony.
Wolters seems sure he's found not just an abductor but a murderer, but he needs to prove it and he hasn't even been able to place CB in PdL on 3rd May as yet imo.
Very hard to determine just what he is sure of, no body, no body parts, no forensics, its the words attributed to a snitch imo.Still getting untoward 12 months of telling the world, won't be long now, except I wonder if he regrets the publicity, intimating he's not certain a fair trial can be had.