So what exactly is Wolters sure about?

[Venturi Swirl]

Police officers named John Canaan as the man they believe abducted and murdered Suzy Lamplugh.  Has he taken his case to the ECHR yet because of his human rights breach?

[Eleanor]

Its the fact that the crime is Murder and CB is german.

So if it wasn't Murder then The Germans couldn't do this?

I shall say no more.

[Mr Gray]

So if it wasn't Murder then The Germans couldn't do this?

I shall say no more.

It applies to sexual offences too.. But thsts about. It.
Thsts why the UK  was able to convict Gary Glitter for crimes abroad

[Eleanor]

It applies to sexual offences too.. But thsts about. It.
Thsts why the UK  was able to convict Gary Glitter for crimes abroad

Are you telling me that unless the Germans go for murder or sexual  abuse then they can't do anything to this man?

This is only important in so far as I understand The Law.

[Mr Gray]

Are you telling me that unless the Germans go for murder or sexual  abuse then they can't do anything to this man?

This is only important in so far as I understand The Law.

Only certain crimes give the Germans jurisdiction... Thats about it.

[G-Unit]

Police officers named John Canaan as the man they believe abducted and murdered Suzy Lamplugh.  Has he taken his case to the ECHR yet because of his human rights breach?

Did they?

[Brietta]

Did they?

Why do you think they didn't.


Estate agent Miss Lamplugh was declared dead, presumed murdered, after going missing in July 1986 at the age of 25.

In 2002, police named John Cannan as their prime suspect.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-56400140

[Venturi Swirl]

Did they?

yes.

[Venturi Swirl]

Sound familiar?

“In November 2002, Cannan complained via his solicitors about the police publicly naming him, saying he was "devastated and distressed". He again denied killing Lamplugh.[5] His solicitor complained about a lack of presumption of innocence and that the prison service had withheld letters Cannan had tried to send to national newspapers regarding the allegations”.[28]

[Wonderfulspam]

If John Canaan is guilty then why hasn't he been arrested?

[Venturi Swirl]

If John Canaan is guilty then why hasn't he been arrested?

Because circumstantial evidence (even strong circumstantial evidence) isn’t usually enough to guarantee a conviction.  I expect you believe him innocent,  not just of Suzy’s disappearance but of all his other convictions for rape and murder.  YAWN.

[G-Unit]

Sound familiar?

“In November 2002, Cannan complained via his solicitors about the police publicly naming him, saying he was "devastated and distressed". He again denied killing Lamplugh.[5] His solicitor complained about a lack of presumption of innocence and that the prison service had withheld letters Cannan had tried to send to national newspapers regarding the allegations”.[28]

He has brought at least one civil action against the authorities for breaching his human rights.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/suzy-lamplugh-murder-suspect-john-15495812

[Mr Gray]

He has brought at least one civil action against the authorities for breaching his human rights.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/suzy-lamplugh-murder-suspect-john-15495812

Have you read the article... Its for prison conditions and does not support your argument

[G-Unit]

Have you read the article... Its for prison conditions and does not support your argument

Our understanding of the article's meaning clearly differs.

[Wonderfulspam]

Because circumstantial evidence (even strong circumstantial evidence) isn’t usually enough to guarantee a conviction.  I expect you believe him innocent,  not just of Suzy’s disappearance but of all his other convictions for rape and murder.  YAWN.

Of course I think he is innocent of involvement of Suzy's disappearance.

He hasn't been found guilty.