Author Topic: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?  (Read 15166 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #195 on: June 21, 2021, 09:22:52 AM »
And 15 years & £15 million later there's still no evidence to support it.
IN YOUR OPINION
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #196 on: June 21, 2021, 09:23:56 AM »
Or, in the case of Operation Grange, they have simply followed their remit without bothering to question it.
Ridiculous notion IMO.  We have tested this argument before and as I recall you came unstuck over it - do you want to pursue it all over again?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #197 on: June 21, 2021, 09:24:24 AM »
IN YOUR OPINION

What evidence is there Maddie was abducted?
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #198 on: June 21, 2021, 09:26:13 AM »
The presumption of paedophiles.

Why does it always have to be a paedo that took Maddie, in McCann supporter world?

What evidence is there paedophiles were involved in Maddie's disappearance?
If your child disappeared without trace in the middle of the night from an unlocked apartment in the middle of a holiday resort with the window left open (not as you'd left it) your most likely explanation would be...?  Oh wait, you're a Spam, the answer is bound to be idiotic, so why am I even asking?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #199 on: June 21, 2021, 09:27:41 AM »
What evidence is there Maddie was abducted?
Y-A-W-N.  The evidence that exists, you don't accept, it's pointless going through it all again for the millionth time. 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #200 on: June 21, 2021, 09:27:44 AM »
Aww, my little Spammy stalker only responds to my posts - deeply flattered...  8**8:/:

Why on earth would you think that by replying to your posts I'm stalking you?

If I was stalking you I'd be outside your house, following you home from work, rifling through your bins & stealing your knickers off the washing line.

I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #201 on: June 21, 2021, 09:28:22 AM »
Y-A-W-N.  The evidence that exists, you don't accept, it's pointless going through it all again for the millionth time.

What evidence?
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #202 on: June 21, 2021, 09:28:29 AM »
Why on earth would you think that by replying to your posts I'm stalking you?

If I was stalking you I'd be outside your house, following you home from work, rifling through your bins & stealing your knickers off the washing line.
Aha, so it IS you then, thanks for confirming.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #203 on: June 21, 2021, 09:29:35 AM »
If your child disappeared without trace in the middle of the night from an unlocked apartment in the middle of a holiday resort with the window left open (not as you'd left it) your most likely explanation would be...?  Oh wait, you're a Spam, the answer is bound to be idiotic, so why am I even asking?

If someone stole my kids I'd be grateful.

I hate children.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #204 on: June 21, 2021, 09:31:49 AM »
What evidence?
The evidence that points to abduction.  The evidence you refuse to countenance because you have a visceral hatred of the McCanns and believe with every fibre of your being that they are liars who hid their child's body.  That evidence.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #205 on: June 21, 2021, 09:32:05 AM »
If someone stole my kids I'd be grateful.

I hate children.
I rest my case.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Lace

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #206 on: June 21, 2021, 09:35:00 AM »
The presumption of paedophiles.

Why does it always have to be a paedo that took Maddie, in McCann supporter world?

What evidence is there paedophiles were involved in Maddie's disappearance?

CB happens to be a Paedophile,  he lived near to 5a,   he abused children and spoke about abducting something small on the dark web.  Does that not make you wonder?

Offline Lace

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #207 on: June 21, 2021, 09:37:30 AM »
I have to agree, he can't give specifics because it is all a sham imo.

Wolters has said he won't give specifics as he doesn't want CB concocting a story,   he said he wants to make sure he has a solid case before he questions him.

Offline Lace

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #208 on: June 21, 2021, 09:40:36 AM »
One thing to note is that the first investigation examined the evidence and was unable to find any supporting the theory of stranger abduction. Despite that, both Operation Grange and the Germans appear to be proceeding as if a stranger abduction is a proven fact.

The first investigation came to the conclusion the McCann's were guilty based on the dog evidence.   Amaral was sure the dogs alerted to cadaver,  he was also convinced that the DNA evidence was Madeleine's.

Operation Grange did a review of the case and found numerous leads,  that hadn't been pursued due to the fact Amaral was sure the McCann's were guilty.

As for not questioning the McCann's all that was done by the Portuguese Police.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #209 on: June 21, 2021, 09:41:13 AM »
CB happens to be a Paedophile,  he lived near to 5a,   he abused children and spoke about abducting something small on the dark web.  Does that not make you wonder?

No, because being a paedophile & looking at kid porn doesn't automatically make one a child abductor.

Most paedophiles abuse family, friends children or just drop their pants in the playground.

They don't all go around abducting children.

How many children did Jimmy & Gary Glitter abduct?
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.